SWAT hit on wrong house update

LVSteve

Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2005
Messages
23,064
Reaction score
34,983
Location
Lost Wages, NV
Good news, Las Vegas Metro have stepped up and said they will pay for the repairs to the house they trashed looking for a suspect. Recall that the guy had sold the home five years ago. Damage is estimated to be a minimum of $25k, including destroying the garage door and just about every entryway into the home. Whether closer examination will reveal more serious structural damage remains to be seen.

Still waiting for comment from the judge who signed off on the warrants.

Even better news, the warrants at the other addresses netted several suspects, and over all the operation uncovered how a prostitution and trafficking ring rotated the girls in and out in short order to cover the activities.

 
Register to hide this ad
The information as to ownership being that stale does not speak well of the quality of work. It is likely not only a pretty severe discipline issue, but a Brady/Giglio issue.
 
The information as to ownership being that stale does not speak well of the quality of work. It is likely not only a pretty severe discipline issue, but a Brady/Giglio issue.

Hard to say with such little info provided what happened to screw up.
Brady/Giglio addresses crimes and lies but not sure how it deals with lazy, incompetence or screw ups. And without more info not sure which this is.

Could be a training issue.

Glad to see the city is taking care of it without putting the owner through any more drama.
.
Where I worked had a young narc officer mess up the house numbers on a warrant. Family eating dinner when the door came down, if I recall correctly.

That young narc went on to become Chief. You never know what will happen.
 
One could make comments about the vetting process for command officers. And FWIW, my training here is that incompetence is enough for Brady/Giglio (what is called Potential Impeachment Disclosure) by the prosecutors association. WSP has had to be trained and re-trained on this; the screw it up on the regular.
 
It took a Youtube video from a civil rights guy to get the dirty department to come clean if it's the case I'm thinking of.
 
Thinkin' owner was not home or woulda been DRT.
Yes, she was away. Her security system alerted her to movement at the front of the home. She connected to her cameras and they recorded the SWAT vehicle with the big arm setting up to attack the garage door. After that it all went blank when her cameras were shot out by some means. The News3LV youtube page may still show it, as well as the broken cameras when all was done.

There is little excuse for the address data being five years off. A simple search on the Clark County website will give you the sale record of any home for free.
 
One could make comments about the vetting process for command officers. And FWIW, my training here is that incompetence is enough for Brady/Giglio (what is called Potential Impeachment Disclosure) by the prosecutors association. WSP has had to be trained and re-trained on this; the screw it up on the regular.
Well some folks make mistakes and can't always be as perfect as others.

Guy was actually a really good cop who just made a mistake and paid for it. But shouldn't scar him for life.

Having worked on lots of discipline matters through the FOP I never saw a Giglio issue due to making a mistake. But your experiences may be different.

It is how the mistake is handled that leads to the Giglio issues.

Based off some of the comments there could be a little more to this situation but I am not sure.
 
It happens.

It's a sad fact of societal life these days that these criminals force our lawmen into these scenarios.

Friendly fire happens in war and these days the streets might as well be a war zone. That doesn't mean you should hate the soldiers for just doing they're job (in this case, policemen).
 
Tax payers should NOT be on the hook for the incompetence of folks who didn't do their job and check, triple check before going ahead. Folks should be fired and funds should be taken from the folks held responsible.

What am I saying! It's government, that'll never happen!
 
The information as to ownership being that stale does not speak well of the quality of work. It is likely not only a pretty severe discipline issue, but a Brady/Giglio issue.
I'm more inclined to think this is somebody got sloppy and didn't catch when the suspect was last known at the address. Whether that crosses the Brady/Giglio legal threshold for the case overall I cannot say.
 
Back
Top