Tell me why I should not buy the 640 Pro?

[Eagle1*]

Was just shooting my 642 J Frame and my Glocks at the range and my 642 absolutely loves the Speer Gold Dot SB 135 grn +P round. I was amazed at the accuracy I was getting from that round out of my new 642.
Of course, as I was leaving I stopped and looked at the new stuff in the glass and saw they had a 640 Pro. I asked to see it and the noticed the trigger was so much better than my stock 642 and the weight of the gun made me think that it would be pleasant to shoot opposed to the 642. I am just on the fence since it the asking was $750.00. Guy said he could take a little off of the price but not much. I was thinking they were going to take off about $30.00.
So, I ask you fellow Pro owners what you think of your gun and if you actually have shot yours a bunch and carried it or not. I am a auto loader guy due to my job, but every now and then I use my 642 for ccw and thought the Pro would be nice to have, don't know if I would carry it that much over the 642 though, but I sure did like it allot before telling myself to leave before I buy it. Decisions, decisions... Would appreciate some you you fellow owners to share your opinions and experiences on your ownership of this Pro model to date.. Thanks...

 

[joespapa]

I've had mine about 6 months. Bought used from a forum member for a lot less than that! Have carried it some. Only shot it with .357's. I don't recommend
it! I carry with .38 +p.
Hope this helps,

Al


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Andy Lowry]

I carried a 640 non-Pro for a couple of years and have no complaints at all. It's a great little package.

 

[psjoe]

because the original is better

because the original is better ;-)

 

[Czechvar]

I've been carrying mine in my pocket since June or so, it's been perfect for me. I like the heft, and it disappears completely in my pocket.

 

[texmex]

I have had one since they first came out and it is my most often carried off duty gun. Can't think of a single reason not to get one. Wish I had two.

 

[nate-dogg]

I recently posted in another thread that I just switched from carrying my 642 to the 640 pro. It's heavier so the recoil is much more manageable, the sights are much nicer than the fixed groove, and the trigger is smoother. If the gun you seen was brand new never fired the price seems fair but if it's pre owned, it's a bit over priced in my opinion. I'd say used in good condition it should be around 625-650 otd. More I suppose if you really want it. They aren't that common in my area. I got lucky and paid 600 otd but I would have been willing to pay up to 650. Moon clips are a nice touch also, but I'd suggest getting a moon clip tool so you don't bend them.

 

[Ribwizzard]

I'd much rather have a regular 640, than the pro.

 

[1sailor]

Grab-a Gun currently has them in stock for $635 plus $9 shipping.

 

[Qc Pistolero]

If I read you correctly,you are seriously asking us why NOT buy a S&W!On this forum!
May I respectfully say that you are at the wrong forum for such a question.If you want an honest answer,go to the''wifes of multiple S&W gun owners'' site.They'll give you reasons why not to buy another Smith.
But I'd rather warn you beforehand;going to this forum is at your own risks since it has been known to be infested with incurable viruses.And the cure for these viruses is way more expensive than just buying another S&W!Guess you got your answer!

 

[shouldazagged]

Personally I can't see carrying a snubby up-close-and-nasty gun with .357 Magnum ammo--that control and faster second shot thing. Better sights don't concern me for a gun likely to be used at no more than ten yards, and probably a lot less. By far the most likely use of a snub revolver or mini-autoloader is a quick point-and-shoot situation.

I'm not saying you shouldn't buy the 640 Pro if you like it and think you need it. I'm just saying I wouldn't. If I didn't already have and carry a plain-Jane .38 Special 640, I would look for one. All the Centennial series are great little pocket guns. I just prefer one that's all steel and don't need one in .357..

 

[viney266]

As long as the weight won't be a problem. I think it's a great piece. I have an older 640, a bit heavy for pocket carry or ankle work, but I like everything else about it.

I love the sights on the new pro, and the fluted barrel is sexy. I have been looking myself. You DO have the 642 already for pocket carry. Soooo, yeah, why not?

 

[CH4]

As long as the weight won't be a problem. I think it's a great piece. I love the sights on the new pro, and the fluted barrel is sexy. I have been looking myself.

I love mine for all the above reasons and it has no IL. For me it looks and feels more like an old school Smith; I also like the flexibility of carrying .38s or magnums. I actually carry 4 +Ps and a magnum for the last shot.

 

[two-bit cowboy]

I won't try to convince anyone they should or shouldn't buy or carry a particular gun.

I carry a 640 Pro in the woods for all those things in the forest that have eyes (with apologies to Bev Doolittle). It's exactly a half pound heavier than my M&P 340 loaded with the same magnum ammo. I don't notice the weight, but I sure notice the steel gun's enhanced shoot-ability, especially with the Karl Nill Centennial grips (feels like a K-frame).

My two bits.

 

[MTKTM]

I have an original 640, bought it in the early-mid 90s. IIRC, it was the earliest of the J-frame 357s and something of a novelty at the time. I also bought a 640 Pro a few years back. Both are fine revolvers, but I like the Pro a bit better, mainly because of the improved sights. The sights, the barrel flutes, and the fact that the Pro cylinder is cut for moon clips, are the differences between the two. The flutes are mostly cosmetic, you either like the look or don't. The option of using clips is not a bad thing, but not a big deal to me. The sights are what sells it in my opinion.

 

[Eagle1*]

Thanks for all the responses, I am VERY close to pulling the trigger on this gun thats why I wanted some input on one. Trying to decide if I want this Pro model or a K6 Kimber. The Pro fits everything I have like holsters, speed loaders etc. Had a K6 a year ago and sold it and that gun was a very nice revolver. Decisions, decision...

 

[GTBL]

I have a 640 Pro and love the sights and Fluted barrel. I have looked at the K6 a couple of times but there is just something about the way it looks that always turns me away. I'm sure the K6 is a fine gun, I just prefer Smiths when it comes to revolvers.

 

[Hapworth]

I'd say don't get the 640 Pro if the 642 is:

1) Already serving you well, which you say it is (there just isn't that huge a difference between them carry and performance-wise), and

2) These aren't primary personal defense firearms for you, which you say they aren't.

For something the size and weight of the 640 Pro, I'd go with the K6S: extra round; better trigger; size-wise just as concealable but a little more shootable.

Speaking of triggers, if the 640 Pro you looked at has a better trigger than your 642, it's random -- they're identical inside and the Pro gets no more shop time than the 642.

 

[revolver686]

The 640 Pro is a fine little gun. I like the sights, they're a great improvement and make this a dandy range gun - you can actually aim it. Carrying it is a bit more of a bother than an airweight J-frame, but the extra weight makes firing magnum rounds a reasonable proposition. I find Speer Gold Dot short-barrel .357s to be very manageable.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

[KalamazooKid]

I like mine a lot - especially with the 3 finger CT grips that, like the Cowboy said, feels and shoots like a K frame.