I don't want to mess up anyone else's threads, but I'm starting to think I need an education about what others see in heavily worn pistols in general and heavily worn S&W all-metal pistols in particular. There seems to be an attraction to them that goes beyond (typically lower) initial price alone... and I'm not getting it. 
Okay, I'll admit it. I like my 3rd Gens just as new and pretty and as clean as I can possibly get them.
I'll even go so far as to "trade up" if I can find a particular gun that's cleaner and newer than mine... although so far I've kept all of them citing the important and critical need for 3rd Gen back-up parts.
But that's going to have to change soon enough. Simple finances and not unlimited safe space will dictate that. 
So what is it? Is it that the heavily worn guns have more "character"?
More "history"?
More "experience"?
More "soul"?
Better candidates for restoration projects or customizing?
Or possibly a more appropriate purchase (i.e., "pre-distressed") for a gun bought specifically for expected extra rough usage? 
Or is it really just a simple financial thing?
I can see where there is some money to be saved initially... but it also seems like you will lose that financial advantage upon later resale.
So what's the point? 
I even go so far as to collect bright stainless (or stainless/alloy) 3rd Gens exclusively just so I don't have to deal with worn bluing.
Lord knows I hate worn bluing.
Or am I missing out on something really good and fun that I just can't see? 
So educate me please.
What am I missing?
Help a poor, old, confused man to understand. 

Okay, I'll admit it. I like my 3rd Gens just as new and pretty and as clean as I can possibly get them.



So what is it? Is it that the heavily worn guns have more "character"?






Or is it really just a simple financial thing?



I even go so far as to collect bright stainless (or stainless/alloy) 3rd Gens exclusively just so I don't have to deal with worn bluing.



So educate me please.


