I was not sure where to sure where to post this topic, so apologies in advance if this is the wrong place.
I just read that Mr. Baldwin said in an interview that he did not "pull the trigger "and "never would pull the trigger" on the revolver used on the set of Rust. I did a quick search and found that the revolver used was a Pietta SAA in .45 Colt. He was holding the weapon (it did not fall). More info will come out in the next scheduled interview.
My question is, what kind of Lawyer would suggest that Mr. Baldwin take this position? Where is this going? How do you intend to prove that a SAA style revolver simply fired by itself? Is the intent to go after the manufacturer for making a defective revolver? We all know the absurdity of this argument.
I'm interested in opinions.
I just read that Mr. Baldwin said in an interview that he did not "pull the trigger "and "never would pull the trigger" on the revolver used on the set of Rust. I did a quick search and found that the revolver used was a Pietta SAA in .45 Colt. He was holding the weapon (it did not fall). More info will come out in the next scheduled interview.
My question is, what kind of Lawyer would suggest that Mr. Baldwin take this position? Where is this going? How do you intend to prove that a SAA style revolver simply fired by itself? Is the intent to go after the manufacturer for making a defective revolver? We all know the absurdity of this argument.
I'm interested in opinions.