The best of both... three(?) worlds in a pre-27.

Todd1917

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2009
Messages
60
Reaction score
71
Location
Phoenix/Mesa, Arizona
I very, VERY seldom seek out a gun but rather have a sense of interests and when they cross my path and the cost/finances gods favor me, I pounce.

I let a .38/44 go many years ago as it made little sense to me other than collectibility. Too, it financed something of a Czech flavor that I was seriously jonseing for.

In any case, here last week I get a call about an estate sale with guns&stuff.

I give them a once over, sharpen my pencil and form an offer which was happily taken.

In one fell swoop I scored a pre-27 and a relatively early nickel 39-2. BOTH on my personal *watch list*. Also some other neat bits.

Now, I'm waiting for my *Letter* on it. I figure S 76**0 puts it solidly in the post-war '40's but the letter will nail that down. Even if early 50's, I don't care.

Now to the "best of..."

I have ZERO interest in NIB guns or even those of such a high condition/collectibility that I fear handling too much let alone shooting.

This rascal got CARRIED! But is still quite tight and with my most desired 3.5 inch barrel to boot. Win..... Win..... wait for it..... WIN!!!

One grip is serially marked while the other, though perfectly matching, is not. I'm not completely certain that they both should be anyhow.

It came with a vintage Fitz target grip as well.

So, here it is:
 

Attachments

  • 4FD3415E-402F-4B0A-9FA2-BDBB94778062.jpg
    4FD3415E-402F-4B0A-9FA2-BDBB94778062.jpg
    69 KB · Views: 493
  • FE77714F-6FCD-4478-8904-53D3E3FDC68E.jpg
    FE77714F-6FCD-4478-8904-53D3E3FDC68E.jpg
    70.5 KB · Views: 463
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
... Now, I'm waiting for my *Letter* on it. I figure S 76**0 puts it solidly in the post-war '40's but the letter will nail that down. Even if early 50's, I don't care...

That style of hammer is the first visual indication that it's definitely later than you're guessing. That hammer first showed up in 1950. Your gun is most likely a '51 vintage with that serial number.

Mark
 
This rascal got CARRIED! But is still quite tight and with my most desired 3.5 inch barrel to boot. Win..... Win..... wait for it..... WIN!!!

So, here it is:

attachment.php


attachment.php

Todd:

That is a real beauty!:cool:

Congrats... Congrats... CONGRATS:D and thanks for sharing,
 
Last edited:
That style of hammer is the first visual indication that it's definitely later than you're guessing. That hammer first showed up in 1950. Your gun is most likely a '51 vintage with that serial number.

Mark

Got it. I'll take that too. I was just hoping that it wasn't in the mid 50's as most that I see listed are. Wouldn't really matter in the end - just a bit less common.

Seems like the vast majority I came across in looking were strangely within the same couple of years of '55-'56.
 
Stocks are numbered only on the right one. S76xxx should be a 1950 shipped gun. But, one can never be sure without a letter, although I would think they went out the door as fast as they could make them back then.

Thank you. I'll update when the letter comes.
 
With any kind of luck you will see a couple of photos of my .357 Magnum from April (I think, letter not handy) 1950, serial S759xx. Notice that it has the earlier service style hammer, which I understand they put on some of the first post war model 1950 .357s, very soon to be replaced with the semi target hammer.
My understanding that the model of 1950, .357s began around serial number S755xx. You have found a jewel!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0083.jpg
    IMG_0083.jpg
    82.6 KB · Views: 42
  • IMG_0082.jpg
    IMG_0082.jpg
    95.6 KB · Views: 38
With any kind of luck you will see a couple of photos of my .357 Magnum from April (I think, letter not handy) 1950, serial S759xx. Notice that it has the earlier service style hammer, which I understand they put on some of the first post war model 1950 .357s, very soon to be replaced with the semi target hammer.
My understanding that the model of 1950, .357s began around serial number S755xx. You have found a jewel!

I appreciate the information and the photographs.

At least the second time that the hammer has been commented upon.

That's an interesting switch.

I wonder - for the super-geniuses - which hammer did Registered Magnums have?
 
... which hammer did Registered Magnums have?

The pre-war Magnums had a "standard" hammer with concentric grooves on the sides...




... or some of the later ones had the "Humpback" hammer with concentric grooves on the side:



All of the un-modified pre-war Magnum hammers were long action.

Hope that this helps.
 
Last edited:
The pre-war Magnums had a "standard" hammer with concentric grooves on the sides...




... or some of the later ones had the "Humpback" hammer with concentric grooves on the side:



All of the un-modified pre-war Magnum hammers were long action.

Hope that this helps.
Thank you for the description and the wonderful photographs.

I was completely unaware of that hammer style. Good to know. Were I to see one in a bin I'd have likely thought it an un-finished piece.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top