The wonderful world of J-frames!

New model 49 no dash

Just acquired this little gun at a local pawn shop. Some faint freckling, faint turn line, functions fine. It joins a New Departure 38 SW, Double action 44, two victories, and a model 59. All fine guns for their era and purpose. Two questions; Are the grips actually Smith and Wesson (They do have the medallion), and with a serial of 12Jxx what would be the approximate year of manufacture? Thanks for all. Like this thread.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1455.jpg
    IMG_1455.jpg
    141.8 KB · Views: 146
Just got this little guy a few days ago for my carry gun. I have been wanting to carry something when I go out and have been wanting a 442, just so happened I guy I know wanted my rifle and wanted to trade his 442-2. Came with a holster too.
 

Attachments

  • 20170811_172544.jpg
    20170811_172544.jpg
    204.4 KB · Views: 115
I only have two j frames. But I'm a big fan. The 36 I bought from an MCSO deputy who was retiring. He had carried it as a BUG but the hammer stud broke on it. Was able to fix that and it fills my little niche in my modest collection as my "classic detective" gun.

The 640 is my BUG at work and my main off duty carry. They're a good pair

IMG_4253.jpg
 
Just acquired this little gun at a local pawn shop. Some faint freckling, faint turn line, functions fine. It joins a New Departure 38 SW, Double action 44, two victories, and a model 59. All fine guns for their era and purpose. Two questions; Are the grips actually Smith and Wesson (They do have the medallion), and with a serial of 12Jxx what would be the approximate year of manufacture? Thanks for all. Like this thread.

I've never seen original S&W stocks quite like that. I can tell you they are not J-Frame stocks. They are friggen HUGE!!
 
I've never seen original S&W stocks quite like that. I can tell you they are not J-Frame stocks. They are friggen HUGE!!

I'm not so sure.

They look awfully similar to the round butt combats the factory issued in '89, except they appear to be for a square butt.
 

Attachments

  • Mod. 36-2 DAO L '89.jpg
    Mod. 36-2 DAO L '89.jpg
    123 KB · Views: 102
  • Mod. 36-2 DAO L 1989.jpg
    Mod. 36-2 DAO L 1989.jpg
    94.7 KB · Views: 106
I finally got my hands on a forged hammer .357 640-1, a nice example I might say. Now I know why I've been through 8 or 9 snubs...none have been in the Goldilocks zone of 23 oz weight, 2.1" barrel length, DAO and J frame deep concealment, until this...wow.
fwnkSfv.jpg
 
Last edited:
I have always been intrigued by the looks and idea of a model 49 or 649, but have one question. If used as a pocket gun, is there a need to be concerned about lint and other crud finding its way inside the action, through hammer slot on top? If so, would you need to remove the sideplate to clean it? Or is this not a concern?
 
Between my son and I, there are six or so J frames in the house. As a poster mentioned, several years back S&W made an unwise decision to go to the Magnum frame for all the J's . It wasn't needed for the .22, .32 or .38 Special versions, the regular J is a more elegant frame IMO.
 
I have always been intrigued by the looks and idea of a model 49 or 649, but have one question. If used as a pocket gun, is there a need to be concerned about lint and other crud finding its way inside the action, through hammer slot on top? If so, would you need to remove the sideplate to clean it? Or is this not a concern?

Nope....but I wouldn't carry change or small items in the same pocket with any revolver. I can't think of a single time in 45 years I've ever had to remove a side plate to clean a revolver because it was carried in a pocket.
 
Back
Top