Thumbpiece/Cylinder release, Old or new style, Preference?

Favorite S&W Cylinder Release Thumbpiece??

  • Old School, Round Dish

    Votes: 58 66.7%
  • New Style, angular, High speed, low drag

    Votes: 29 33.3%

  • Total voters
    87
  • Poll closed .
Joined
Feb 6, 2010
Messages
457
Reaction score
459
Location
NW Ohio
I was wondering what the general consensus is on the two cylinder release thumb pieces. . .
I am partial to the old style myself, mostly because when growing up learning my guns apart, that was the easiest way for me to tell smiths, from colts, from rugers. . . Obviously now I understand the much more intricate differences, but nostalgia takes me back to the old style. . .

I assume they are interchangeable correct?
 

Attachments

  • Old School.jpg
    Old School.jpg
    29 KB · Views: 368
  • new school.jpg
    new school.jpg
    21.1 KB · Views: 421
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Years of familiarity with the traditional thumb piece makes the current one feel considerably less positive in function. To me it is like trying to foist "New Coke" onto my taste buds. Nope, ain't gonna happen.
 
I happen to like the new one...on new guns. On my competition revolvers, for example, which all feature MIM hammers and triggers and the MIM thumbpiece (but no locks):
3640666594_30c8ca2b93.jpg


For those, I feel it's easier for me to flip my thumb down to hit the cylinder release latch and not have to worry as much about placement. If I'm using an old-style thumbpiece, if I use my usual technique, I end up pushing on the sharp edge of the thumbpiece.

Conversely, I can't imagine any of my older revolvers having a new-style thumbpiece:
4059562939_664e5c740a.jpg

3122504673_39599c8d4e.jpg


I don't practice quick reloads with the old pieces, however.
 
I have the new style on a 629-4. The angle is fine, but I find that my thumb slips a bit. Has anyone used the SDM with its "tack sharp checkering"? Brownell's has them.
 
I voted Coke Classic. Same for the cylinder stop: give me the machined dowel to the MIM'd ugliness any day.
 
I prefer the old style, If there is one thing on the new guns I do not like, it's the Buck Rodgers release. To me it neither looks right nor feels right.

However, it's not enough to stop me from purchasing a gun I want. I'll just wait until I need some parts and order some old style thumb releases for the new guns.
 
Actually I prefer the new thumbpiece to the original.

I have it on all my competition and carry revolvers. Feels better and operates easier, for me.

It's the only thing that S&W has done to its revolvers that I DO like. Regards 18DAI.
 
Just thought I would chime in on the topic with some recent experience. I prefer whatever is original to the model, so no real preference. But someone mentioned that they are interchangeable, this is not entirely true. Some of the older dish ones may look similar but those thumb latches from the 50's and up have a complete oval on the back with the hole for the latch nut, while older M&P's have what looks like a half round piece on one side of the hole and another on the other side. But they do not completely surround the hole fot the nut. I wish I had some pics to show what I am trying to describe. Anyway, I am not sure what the latest triangle latches look like on the back, but they may function but likely won't fit perfectly. Just my two cents.
 
I like the old style. But in shooting hard kicking handguns, it will remove skin from your knuckle so this is why (I believe) they redesigned it.
 
Gotta agree with 18DAI, it's the only change that S&W has made in the last few years that I really like. Having said that, I have not changed out the old style releases in my old guns. They just wouldn't look right to me if I did that.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top