To cast N. J. Rabensburg into a “Brill era” is misleading.

arabensburg

Member
Joined
May 17, 2018
Messages
156
Reaction score
759
Location
La Grange, Texas
To cast N. J. Rabensburg into a "Brill era" is misleading.

Rabensburg worked for himself for most of his career as the N. J. Rabensburg Company. He was employed by the Brill family for a brief 3 years, but that time frame was used to take care of his due diligence prior to purchase. He was never a Brill company man.

Rabensburg's leather making career spanned from 1906 to 1961 or 55 years. Excluding his 3 year apprenticeship in Austin and La Grange, his 2 years in Dallas, Texas and Silver City, New Mexico and his 3 years at the A. W. Brill Company, Rabensburg's total time left as a full owner or partner leaves a balance of 47 years.

In contrast, the A. W. Brill Company was in existence from 1912 to 1935 or 23 years. The N. J. Rabensburg Company including 5 years as Zwiener and Rabensburg was, thus, actively in operation for twice the number of years as the A. W. Brill Company.

To place N. J. Rabensburg into a Brill era is in error because he was never a part of the Brill family network except in wholesale and retail exchange during the 1920s.

The three year plan between 1932 to 1935 was to determine suitability and to experience operation. He was there to test the larger Austin market for his leather products including his holsters and belts, and it worked because he closed the deal in about September 1935.

The alternative was not to purchase A. W. Brill but to open his own shop and start from scratch or find another existing saddlery business to purchase, which was more suitable.

The "A. W. Brill" name could have faded into distant memory after 1935 if Rabensburg had chosen to do so and marked the same holsters as we know and see today with "N. J. Rabensburg maker, Austin, Texas". But he did not. Instead, he continued using the A. W. Brill maker stamp because holster name recognition made good sense during a period of hard times.

During my lifetime, the "Brill" name as a business connection was never discussed in the Rabensburg family except as a purchase happening in the distant past. The Brill and Rabensburg families, on a personal level, were close friends and were seen and heard on many occasions.

Rabensburg sold his belts and holsters under the name "N. J. Rabensburg" as evident by the 1950 outside signage at 1903 N. Lamar Blvd. There was no mention of "A. W. Brill" even though the holsters would carry the A. W. Brill maker mark.

There is no mention of A. W. Brill holsters in the 1959 American newspaper article by Antia Brewer on the holster career of N. J. Rabensburg. Only the purchase of the company. The Brill name did become evident in an enlargement of the newspaper photo, but this could not be seen by the readers of the article.

No, N. J. Rabensburg was never a part of the Brill operation, even between 1932 to 1935. The production of his holsters at that time was a test of the market for himself even though his holsters were required to carry the A. W. Brill mark. Rabensburg had no plans for purchase unless there was customer acceptance, and there was.

The only people who were a part of the A. W. Brill network for handgun holsters were Charles W. Kluge and the "mystery man".

The one and only "Brill" era was, thus, from 1912 to 1935. N. J. Rabensburg was never a part of 2nd "Brill" era. Such a connection was never discussed in the Rabensburg family or can be found in 20th Century documentation.

The A. W. Brill mark on many Rabensburg-made holsters was a Depression marketing tool. It carried over into World War II and the Korean Conflict years.

Rabensburg could have finally changed the mark on his holsters to his own name around 1950, but then he was at the age of semi-retirement and such a need had now expired.

20th Century customers knew that Rabensburg-made holsters and the A. W. Brill name had become synonymous, that is, one and the same. A pseudonym.

By Neale Rabensburg
 

Attachments

  • N J Rabensburg Business Sign 1903 N Lamar Blvd (2).jpg
    N J Rabensburg Business Sign 1903 N Lamar Blvd (2).jpg
    89.6 KB · Views: 34
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
I hate to say it, Neale, but this sounds NUTS to me!

As long as your grandfather put the AW Brill name on his holsters, he was in the Brill era. Many of us here who had been collecting for quite a few years didn't know the name Rabensburg. When we acquired a Brill holster, we owned a Brill, not a Kluge or a Rabensburg. Now we know the two time periods of the early maker, Kluge, and the later maker, Rabensburg, but they are both Brill holsters.

When we buy an El Paso Saddlery holster, we are buying an El Paso Saddlery holster….not a "whoever owns El Paso Saddlery" holster. On the other hand, the other items that you have shown that were "NJ Rabensburg" maker marked were his, and not part of AW Brill. Following your logic, "The one and only "Brill" era was, thus, from 1912 to 1935.", wouldn't be true either. Your logic says this would be the Kluge era, wouldn't it?

My wild guess would be that the pictured sign is fro his "semi-retirement" time.

As far as "20th Century customers knew that Rabensburg-made holsters and the A. W. Brill name had become synonymous, that is, one and the same." I have to disagree with that too. Maybe customers in Texas knew he was making them, but my guess is nationally that wouldn't be true. Do you have any catalogs from your grandfather's time? If what you say is correct then I would guess that his name would be all over them, and Brill, not so much! JMHO.
Larry
 
Last edited:
I agree that N.J. Rabensburg was a 'master' saddler in his own right, since his LaGrange Saddlery days.

Kluge was also a master saddler. But the other players in our tale -- Wroe and Brill -- were not saddlers at all. Even Charles' brother was not a saddler but an accountant educated in Germany.

So N.J. deserves recognition for his own contributions. In the scabbard area, though, these are unrecognizable to the collector without the A.W. Brill stamp that he applied himself. It takes a true expert to know one from another, such as you and me, but beyond the average collector.

To that end we have 'early' and 'late' Brills, or 'Kluge Brills' and 'Rabensburg Brills'. Dates are a guide for collectors when they are matching a scabbard with a revolver. Butch Cassidy's Brill and Colt, we now know COULD have been Butch's BECAUSE IT IS IN THE KLUGE STYLE AND NOT MARKED A.W. BRILL. While Butch was dead before Brill was established.

It it's not a Brill then it has a different maker's name on it, such as L.A.Sessums' (who didn't make them himself anyway; like August he was a businessman and had a specific saddler make his scabbards for him, named Robert Rogers then son Bedell Rogers).

So your perspective is appreciated by the Holstorian :-).
 
Back
Top