Trigger job-speed hammer pics

Allen 1

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
87
Reaction score
57
Location
Daytona Beach,Fl
In my original post titled -First post- I explaned how I did my 15-22 trigger job. It gained alot of interest.

People wanted to see how I did my "speed" hammer". Well, here ya go. I finally got some pics up as promised.

My 15-22
IMG_9748.jpg


This is the modified "speed hammer" The rear "hook" has been removed to lighten the "mass".
IMG_9752.jpg



This shows the JP reduced power springs installed.
IMG_9753.jpg


Another view
IMG_9755.jpg


This shows the foil tape I installed to fix the stock "wobble".
IMG_9760.jpg


Vortex Strikefire - perfect co-witness.
IMG_9759.jpg


UTG weapons light. Love this light!
IMG_9756.jpg


ERGO Tactical grip.
IMG_9758.jpg


Gripod - Yep, it's a real one!
IMG_9751.jpg
 
Register to hide this ad
Nice. I really liked your tape fix for the stock wobble. It's definitely on my "to do" list. Filling the buffer tube with ammo to balance out my rifle is another one of your nifty ideas that I incorporated. Thanks!
 
Sorry I took so long on the pics. Been busy around here.

I just hopes these pics help you all with your trigger projects.

If anyone has any questions or need to see other pics just let me know and I will help.

God bless.
 
Very nice, the hammer looks like it grew there, thanks pghrich
 
When you do a trigger job using the JP reduced power springs you need to remove "mass" from the hammer.

The stock hammer spring works well with the stock hammer but we are no longer using the stock hammer spring.

We are now asking a "reduced" power spring to move the same "mass" as the stock spring.

This is where we run into trouble with "light strikes". The hammer never achieves full power to make a reliable strike.

So to overcome this, we must reduce the "mass" we are trying to move. So, by reducing the "mass" of the hammer we get it moving much faster and with a much more powerful "strike" resulting in reliable primer ignition using a reduced power spring.

What we are looking for is a relationship between parts that produce a lighter trigger pull and reliable ignition. This modification achieves this.

Counting the rounds I fired this past weekend, I have put well over 2000 rounds on this trigger and hammer and it has been flawless.

Stay safe and God bless.
 
Reply to Thread

Thanks for the info. Allen1, how ever I have one question, what did you use to remove the "hook" from the hammer? I do know this much it is a hardened piece. I wish I would have had this info. when I first tried installing the JP yellow springs in my "rig".
 
Thanks for the info. Allen1, how ever I have one question, what did you use to remove the "hook" from the hammer? I do know this much it is a hardened piece. I wish I would have had this info. when I first tried installing the JP yellow springs in my "rig".

I simply used a Dremel Tool and the reinforced cutoff wheel. It cut pretty easily.

Once I had it removed I rounded the cut off with a sandpaper roll that came with the Dremel.

I then used some "cold blue" to finish it. Looks like a factory piece.
 
Did this trigger job last week and took it out today. Noticeable difference in the feel of the trigger and not one issue
 
I did the JPE spring job, but kept the hammer stock. who would have ever thought $10 would make that much difference? I did not bob the hammer, and not experiencing any problems, but if I come across another hammer on the cheap, I might give it a try.
 
When you do a trigger job using the JP reduced power springs you need to remove "mass" from the hammer.

The stock hammer spring works well with the stock hammer but we are no longer using the stock hammer spring.

We are now asking a "reduced" power spring to move the same "mass" as the stock spring.

This is where we run into trouble with "light strikes". The hammer never achieves full power to make a reliable strike.

So to overcome this, we must reduce the "mass" we are trying to move. So, by reducing the "mass" of the hammer we get it moving much faster and with a much more powerful "strike" resulting in reliable primer ignition using a reduced power spring.

What we are looking for is a relationship between parts that produce a lighter trigger pull and reliable ignition. This modification achieves this.

Counting the rounds I fired this past weekend, I have put well over 2000 rounds on this trigger and hammer and it has been flawless.

Stay safe and God bless.

you could also drill some holes in the trigger to lighting it. pyper
 
you could also drill some holes in the trigger to lighting it. pyper

I assume you mean hammer as apposed to trigger?

Remember that when you start drilling holes you weaken that part and open the door to "stress" fractures.

It's like taking a 2 foot long 2x4 and drilling holes in it. Indeed you have lightened it, but, you have also "weakened" it considerably. But, if you take that same 2x4 and cut it in half you not only "lighten" it you also retain its strength.

Now, if you indeed meant to drill holes in the trigger blade, that only makes a cosmetic / appearance change and weakens the trigger blade. It will in no way reduce the trigger pull. It would reduce the overall weight of the gun however, be it ever so minimal. ;)
 
Well, Allen.... I did it.. Won't get to test fire until this weekend, but no issues.

I used a dremel cutoff disk, then did a small amount of sanding, and rounded the edges just a bit, and then polished with some fitz and hit it with my bluing pen.

I went for a bit more of the angular corners than you, trying to emulate the factory edges.
 

Attachments

  • photo(1).JPG
    photo(1).JPG
    76.4 KB · Views: 370
Back
Top