Trigger Shoe on Model 28

squid8286

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2003
Messages
105
Reaction score
105
Location
North Carolina
I recently picked up a 1968 4" Model 28 that I intend to use as a walkaround gun in the woods, since it is in "used but not abused" condition. Very smooth action on this old N Frame. It came with some sort of a shoe on the trigger to make the standard trigger as wide (or wider maybe) as the standard target trigger. I am assuming that this was an aftermarket company that made these things. Feels like it is constructed from steel instead of aluminum. I actually liked the feel of it on the gun, but I took it off for now. What is the info on these things? Were they really popular at one time? It seems very well made. Obligatory pics of gun in question from GB. I haven't taken any other pics of it yet.
 

Attachments

  • 1968 Model 28.jpg
    1968 Model 28.jpg
    163.7 KB · Views: 193
Register to hide this ad
From the amount of residue underneath, this thing had been on a LONG time. But other than that there were only two tiny marks from the allen screws - no displaced metal. The guy that put it on must've known his business. I am thinking of leaving it off, as I tend to torque stuff down a little too hard.
 
Trigger shoes were once popular, on both target and holster guns. Even a few LE duty guns sported them for a while. The two cup pointed Allen screws, used to attach them to the gun's trigger, near invariably leave circular dimples on the trigger when removed. More seriously, the shoes are often wider than the trigger guard, posing a potential for a ND when holstering. They are prohibited in many competitive shooting disciplines because of this.

The only fix for the ugly trigger circles is to replace the trigger with a proper unmolested trigger.
 
You can barely see the marks, and the metal isn't dented at all. I must have gotten lucky. There was a pile of crud under it, though.
 
they are "fine" if you like them on the range.. but some people argue they could slip and bind up the trigger at the worst possible time... my late father had one on his edc for years... never an issue...

It did occur to me that it could slip off at the worst possible moment. I will probably leave it off. Who made these things?
 
Up to the early1990's, when I shot NRA bullseye pistol, most of the .45 acp "soft ball" guns had after-market trigger shoes and extended ribs installed (Red Dot sights had not been invented yet, or the early ones were looked down on by the old timers). But even some cops would put them on their revolvers, which I didn't think it was very smart because the wide trigger shoe could rub on the side of the holster as a loaded revolver was being put back in the holster resulting in an AD (in NRA Bullseye Pistol you don't use a holster) Since they didn't have loctite back then, they would add clear fingernail polish to the screw and tighten the living daylights to keep them from coming loose. These are many of the guns with the dimples on the side of the trigger nowadays.
 

Attachments

  • rl-shockey-colt-bullseye-target-custom-1911-45-acp-pistol-c19459.jpg
    rl-shockey-colt-bullseye-target-custom-1911-45-acp-pistol-c19459.jpg
    43.3 KB · Views: 38
Last edited:
I added shoes to 2 S&Ws, a prewar K-22 and 1950s K-38. Neither get holstered so they're fine, and I like the added control. I knew the likelihood of ever selling these guns was very small, so adding something that left permanent marks wasn't a big deal.

I would do the same with my new Colt Python if I could find one that matched up. The trigger on the new ones is a different profile.
 
The steel trigger shoes were the Flaig "Ace". These were quite popular for target revolvers in the 1950s and '60s. There are two legitimate reasons to avoid them. First, as noted, the set screws mar the sides of the trigger. Second, because the trigger shoe is wider than the trigger guard they are a real accidental discharge risk for guns carried in holsters. For this reason many police departments banned them from use by officers on duty revolvers.
 
Trigger shoes helped, in the day of the bullseye shooting discipline, to make the trigger pull feel lighter because the device spread out the pressure applied by the trigger finger across a bigger area on the face of the trigger. Although I shot those matches, I never used the trigger shoe. I thought it was a bad idea then, and I have seen nothing to make me think otherwise 50 years later.
 
Last edited:
These were quite common in my early LE days. For single action shooting they provided more contact surface on the trigger, thus a lighter feel. Many cops. me included, carried them on duty. I never heard of a malfunction, such as holster interference or loosening. All the departments I knew of allowed them.

The most common qualification course then was the FBI PPC course, which also became the standard competition course. As more and more really skilled shooters (not me) got involved those pioneers struck upon the idea of shooting the entire course DA, even though SA was allowed at 50 yards.

I arrived at this same conclusion. I decided to change to DA all the way through. It took me 3k rounds of concentrated practice to make the transition, but my scores went way up. Off came the trigger shoes. The hot set up from then on was a narrow smooth-faced trigger. For as long as we carried and shot revolvers that was the preference.

This is still so habitual with me that the only way I shoot a DA revolver is DA. My non-LE friends think this is very strange - until I start to shoot.

So in the natural evolution of things trigger shoes became pretty thin on the ground.

But not quite forgotten. Some years ago I bought a Ruger 77/22. Despite their sometime reputation of being poor or inconsistent groupers, I was determined to make mine a sub MOA grouper. I put a lot of money into it, including an after market trigger. I wanted that trigger to feel even lighter by having a broader contact surface, so I installed a trigger shoe. All this worked. I no longer shoot competitively, but if I get into an informal .22 rifle contest, if I lose, it will be because I lost, not my rifle.

All of my DA handguns have narrow smooth triggers. But on my 77/22 the wide trigger via the shoe is perfection.

For the OP I think is just a matter of personal preference how he chooses to equip and shoot his revolver. If his preference is SA then maybe the shoe will be a benefit. For DA, based on my experience and what I have seen in shooters way back, the bare trigger is preferable.
 
Last edited:
Trigger shoe aside, like in a parts drawer;), that is a good looking Highway Patrolman you have. Perfect for your stated use.

Thank you. There is a patch of rust on the other side of the cylinder that looks like like something wet contacted it at some point. Very light pitting that isn't even worth worrying about. It locks up like a bank vault. Looks like it will be a good woods gun.
 
These were quite common in my early LE days. For single action shooting they provided more contact surface on the trigger, thus a lighter feel. Many cops. me included, carried them on duty. I never heard of a malfunction, such as holster interference or loosening. All the departments I knew of allowed them.

The most common qualification course then was the FBI PPC course, which also became the standard competition course. As more and more really skilled shooters (not me) got involved those pioneers struck upon the idea of shooting the entire course DA, even though SA was allowed at 50 yards.

I arrived at this same conclusion. I decided to change to DA all the way through. It took me 3k rounds of concentrated practice to make the transition, but my scores went way up. Off came the trigger shoes. The hot set up from then on was a narrow smooth-faced trigger. For as long as we carried and shot revolvers that was the preference.

This is still so habitual with me that the only way I shoot a DA revolver is DA. My non-LE friends think this is very strange - until I start to shoot.

So in the natural evolution of things trigger shoes became pretty thin on the ground.

But not quite forgotten. Some years ago I bought a Ruger 77/22. Despite their sometime reputation of being poor or inconsistent groupers, I was determined to make mine a sub MOA grouper. I put a lot of money into it, including an after market trigger. I wanted that trigger to feel even lighter by having a broader contact surface, so I installed a trigger shoe. All this worked. I no longer shoot competitively, but if I get into an informal .22 rifle contest, if I lose, it will be because I lost, not my rifle.

All of my DA handguns have narrow smooth triggers. But on my 77/22 the wide trigger via the shoe is perfection.

For the OP I think is just a matter of personal preference how he chooses to equip and shoot his revolver. If his preference is SA then maybe the shoe will be a benefit. For DA, based on my experience and what I have seen in shooters way back, the bare trigger is preferable.

I hate to admit it, but it has been about 25 years since I shot ANY revolver, double OR single action. I have carried and shot a wide variety of semi-autos in that time (both double and single action) but I only recently started getting back into revolvers (mainly because of this site.)
 
Trigger shoes were a fad from the early target days. My dept did not allow them due to the possibility they could slip leaving the revolver inoperative. They would leave a mark on the case hardening of the trigger. The idea was more width for the trigger finger would make the pull feel lighter.
 
Back
Top