Understanding the .44 Special obsession

No sir you really don't want to feed a Bulldog any heavy stuff. It probably won't come apart, but it will be reduced to really loose fitting parts and grossly out of time. But if you treat it with respect it is a great carry piece. Been carrying one since 86.
 
Two of my favorite Lew Hortons. The 624 is one great shooter.

p1010741fm1.jpg
 
Lew Horton should be in charge of S&W. He seems to understand what we like and what we want.
 
Originally posted by Majic1:
As I noted earlier, she bit just a bit when I shot her so I found the set of Pachmayr grips and now she's a genuine pleasure to shoot, even with those snappy 200-gr. JHPs I got from Georgia Ammo.
First time I have ever heard of anyone complaining about the recoil of a .44 spl in a steel revolver and had to put Goodyears on it. It's such a pussycat that it's barely more noticable than a .38 spl.

Majic1, I have rubber on both of mine for that reason. I have CTS in both hands and arms, recoil of anything heavier than .38spl WC is painful. So all my shooters have rubber grips of one kind or the other. The only way I'll stop shooting is when I take my last breath!
 
Originally posted by Majic1:
First time I have ever heard of anyone complaining about the recoil of a .44 spl in a steel revolver and had to put Goodyears on it.

I put rubber grips on my Model 24-3 for a different reason. The wood grips were beautiful, but I found them very slippery. The Hogue rubber grips I'm now using are admittedly ugly, but they afford me a fantastic grip.

S&W_24_3.jpg

S&W_24_6.jpg


The Charter Arms Bulldog is what it is. No, I wouldn't use any "heavy" loads in it. I keep mine stoked with Winchester 200 gr. Silvertips.
 
I put the Pachmayr's on mine to keep the original grips form getting beat up when I carry it. I've seen those original combats go for over $150 on ebay. I have no intention of ever selling them (or the gun for that matter), but I want to keep them nice. The Pach's fit my hand better too.
 
Those are BEAUTIFUL .44 specials!!

I bought a new Model 21 Classic last year. It is now the upstairs bedroom gun. The old Bulldog has been retired to the safe.

One thing I noticed about the Classic .44 is it seems to have a 44 Magnum cylinder with the chambers reamed for only a .44 special cartridge?

Is this correct or am I way out in leftfield?
 
I have always wanted a 44Spl and all this talk and pics is exciting. Just had an email from a fellow forum member,my soon to be mine new to me 624 4 inch is heading to me as we speak. I can't wait
icon_biggrin.gif
already have the ammo loaded for it.
 
I read today that Taurus has a Titanium model in .44 Special with barrel ports and a friend has a Taurus .22 magnum 8-shooter that he really likes.

Any of you .44 Special experts ever tried a Taurus, either Titanium or steel? I've decided my next two pistols will be .44 Special snubby and a .22 magnum with at least a 4" barrel, but don't care which comes first. I'd love to find a good used Smith or two, but it more likely will be Charter or Taurus unless another unbelievable deal like the Model 21-4 crosses my path.
icon_biggrin.gif
 
Originally posted by netfotoj:
Any of you .44 Special experts ever tried a Taurus, either Titanium or steel?

I had one of the now discontinued Taurus all-titanium, ported .41 Magnum snubbies. It was a very well-built pistol and held up well to the stoutest full-house loads I put through. Unfortunately, it held up a lot better than my hand did while shooting it as it literally brought tears to my eyes every time I pulled its trigger.
icon_biggrin.gif


I've since sold it.
 
I have a 624 and a 24-3 both are wonderful guns.I like the mod24 snubby ill have to look for one of those.great pics guys
 
NETFOTOJ

I have the S&W 24 in 3",4" and 6" and a pair of the S&W 21's. I shoot the 3" and the 21's and really love them, that said, my 3" 5 shot blue steel Tarus in 44spec is a fine shooting, very pleasant firearm. While I prefer the S&Ws, I never feel uncomfortable when the Taurus is the gun I have with me. You need not hesitate to buy and depend on the taurus.

Doc
 
not an exspurt, but did buy a Taurus 445 last year. Short 2 incher in polished stainless and spurless hammer with fixed sights. Well made revolver, sighted for, and accurate with, medium speed 200 grain loads. Smallest 44 special owned, recoil not too bad.

There are some caveats. First and formost is unreliable ejection of spent brass with the short ejection stroke. Second is the weak firing pin spring (don't dry fire it empty). The trigger edges got smoothed over, and the hammer shimmed.

Would have to look up the recorded velocitys, but seem to remember Speers factory brass cased 200 gdhp falling into unreliable expansion velocity range.

Couldn't resist such a small 44 special, and consider it worth the purchase price. Use handloads in it.
 
I also love the .44 special, and have a couple of 24-3s in addition to a Colt 3rd generation single action with a 5.5" barrel in that persuasion.

Here's the 24-3 4":

24-3.jpg


And the 24-3 6.5":

24-3-6in.jpg.jpg
 
Paladin wrote
I also love the .44 special
First .45 Colts, now .44 Specials. You are so right on both counts! (BTW, I enjoy your articles in "The Blue Press". Keep 'em coming.)
 
Jay, you have it! Pachy's are the best. I have a set for each of my S&W's. They fit my have and look fine.


Originally posted by Jay in AZ:
I put the Pachmayr's on mine to keep the original grips form getting beat up when I carry it. I've seen those original combats go for over $150 on ebay. I have no intention of ever selling them (or the gun for that matter), but I want to keep them nice. The Pach's fit my hand better too.
 
Finally got around to updating my own site with the full story of how I caught the "44 Special Obsession."

I never mentioned it here, but I started out looking for a .38 snubby. Life's an adventure and sometimes it's best not to end up where you thought you were going.

Baddest Tactical Pistol (Revolver) No. 3

Happy shooting!
 
Back
Top