Underwood 150gr WC in a 70s vintage Airweight?

Joined
Jul 16, 2012
Messages
4,658
Reaction score
4,964
Location
Richmond, Virginia
Picking up a early-70s vintage 42 Centennial Airweight from a fellow SW forum member and am wondering if Underwood 150-gr WCs are safe to fire in an Airweight of that vintage? Underwood doesn't advertise them as +P. Advertised velocity is 1000fps. Thanks in advance

Miss feel free to move if ammo category is more appropriate.
 
Register to hide this ad
Picking up a early-70s vintage 42 Centennial Airweight from a fellow SW forum member and am wondering if Underwood 150-gr WCs are safe to fire in an Airweight of that vintage? Underwood doesn't advertise them as +P. Advertised velocity is 1000fps. Thanks in advance

Miss feel free to move if ammo category is more appropriate.

Might use them as carry ammo for social engagements. But for shooting on the range for practice, go to something lighter/less potent. Don't abuse the 42.
 
That 1,000 FPS advertised velocity is undoubtedly from a test barrel or longer revolver barrel than your J frame. Expect more like 800-850 FPS out of a 1 7/8" J frame snubby.
 
  • Like
Reactions: A10
Was working up some .32 H&R Mag loads for my 2 inch. The test loads were all done in 4 inch barrels according to the manufacturers. When I ran those loads through "Quickload" on my computer the data that came back was about 1/2 the ME & MV when shown in the 2 inch barrel. By all means check with the manufacturer though.
 
I think Underwood spec info on the web page gives velocities for varying barrel lengths.

Just looked and no barrel length given.

SKU: 733 Box Of: 20 Bullet Construction: Coated Soft Cast Bullet Material: Lead Bullet Model: Semi-Wadcutter Hollow Point Gas Check Bullet Weight(gr): 158 Cartridge: .38 Special +P Case Type: Nickel Plated Brass Gun Type: Handgun Hunting: Personal Defense Lead Free: No Muzzle Energy (ft. lbs): 472 Muzzle Velocity (fps): 1160 Sectional Density: 0.177 Suppressor Safe: Yes Velocity Rating: Supersonic

Since it is calling it handgun hunting/personal defense ammo, I would guess at least a 4 inch barrel. Most manufacturers use a 4 inch barrel as their standard.
 
I've had two cracked alloy frames: an S&W Model 38 and a Colt Agent. I shot only standard pressure handloads in these guns. A standard pressure load with a 158 grain bullet will only have a muzzle velocity of around 800 fps at best (often about 750 fps) from a 2" barrel. I'm not familiar with Underwood, but be cautious.
 
I've had two cracked alloy frames: an S&W Model 38 and a Colt Agent. I shot only standard pressure handloads in these guns. A standard pressure load with a 158 grain bullet will only have a muzzle velocity of around 800 fps at best (often about 750 fps) from a 2" barrel. I'm not familiar with Underwood, but be cautious.

I have gotten rid of all my alloy frames and gone to steel frames.
 
I have gotten rid of all my alloy frames and gone to steel frames.

I have one left, a 638, and I may be getting rid of it. Saving a few ounces is hardly worth the durability problem. To me, when they are both loaded with 158 grain ammo, the weight difference between an alloy frame gun and a steel one is hardly noticeable.
 
I have one left, a 638, and I may be getting rid of it. Saving a few ounces is hardly worth the durability problem. To me, when they are both loaded with 158 grain ammo, the weight difference between an alloy frame gun and a steel one is hardly noticeable.

Basically felt the same way.
 
Back
Top