Victory Models Marked "U.S.N. PROPERTY NOD. 1543"

ordnanceguy

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2002
Messages
1,678
Reaction score
3,881
Location
Sunny Florida, USA
Gentlemen:

A recent thread asked about 4 inch, .38 Special Victory Model serialed V73, an early number, with unusual markings. Here is the link to that thread: Victory Base
The original poster was evidently unable to post pics of this gun.

I have some thoughts on this gun's markings, and others, and wanted to toss this out for discussion without appending it to the earlier thread.

First, V73 is not the only example I am aware of that is so marked. Indeed, the Victory Model Database reveals three other guns marked in a similar fashion. Those are V1170, V2033 and V2500.

I think it is not insignificant that all four guns so marked are in relatively close serial number proximity to each other. From the Database I estimate that they likely shipped in the July 1942 time frame. At that time the factory was producing 1000 revolvers per day, so these four were likely manufactured and shipped within 48 hours of each other. It is within the realm of possibility that they all went to the same destination and, thus, received identical markings.

The markings in question are odd for several reasons, but the one that leaps out is that they are oriented aslant at about a 45 degree angle on the left frame below the cylinder latch. Perhaps this was because it was difficult to fit the entire marking on the frame in a level orientation.

Although the assumption is that these guns were shipped to the US Navy, none of the four had factory letter data and, thus, it cannot be said for certain that any or all were, in fact, Navy shipments.

In my Victory archives I located photos I had saved of the latter three guns. Here is V1170. (I did not record the source of any of the photos.)



Here is V2033, a gun that was later refinished to nickle.



And here is V2500.



All of the markings appear to be uniform in their style and application. I suspect that the same facility (or person) marked all of them.

Another oddity is that the NOD is marked with only a single period following the D, rather than N.O.D. or NOD with no following period.

The next obvious question is the meaning of the NOD acronym. A reasonable guess might be Naval Ordnance Depot. However, I have not been able to establish that the term "Naval Ordnance Depot" was in use during WW2. The Navy operated Naval Ammunition Depots, but I have not been able to locate "Naval Ordnance Depot" as a term used in WW2.
Perhaps it is a post-war term, or maybe it just means something other than what I have speculated here.

What about the number "1543"? I think we rule that out as a rack number since all four bear the same number. Perhaps the 1543 is part of the title of the facility itself. But where are the other 1542 such facilities?

Which brings us to the question of greatest significance: Is the marking a legitimate Navy marking at all or simply a fiction dreamed up by an imaginative gun faker? Regrettably, I can't answer that one. The comment in the thread on V73 mentioned that the gun was located in California, a state which once had a flourishing cottage industry of Victory fakers. The fact that a gun is now located in California is not, of course, at all sufficient to condemn it as a fake, but one wonders. For me, the jury is still out on whether this marking is genuine or not.

It is a bit of a mystery. The Database has helped us again by aggregating this information and allowing us to begin this discussion.

If anyone has any better or different information than what I have posited here, I'd invite you to post it. In particular, I would like to see if any of these 4 revolvers have factory or SWHF letters proving shipment to a Navy destination and where that destination was located.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
# V 73 has exactly the same markings. Tried sending pictures to Charlie's Email they didn't go through.
 
Last edited:
Gentlemen:

A recent thread asked about 4 inch, .38 Special Victory Model serialed V73, an early number, with unusual markings. Here is the link to that thread: Victory Base
The original poster was evidently unable to post pics of this gun.

I have some thoughts on this gun's markings, and others, and wanted to toss this out for discussion without appending it to the earlier thread.

First, V73 is not the only example I am aware of that is so marked. Indeed, the Victory Model Database reveals three other guns marked in a similar fashion. Those are V1170, V2033 and V2500.

I think it is not insignificant that all four guns so marked are in relatively close serial number proximity to each other. From the Database I estimate that they likely shipped in the July 1942 time frame. At that time the factory was producing 1000 revolvers per day, so these four were likely manufactured and shipped within 48 hours of each other. It is within the realm of possibility that they all went to the same destination and, thus, received identical markings.

The markings in question are odd for several reasons, but the one that leaps out is that they are oriented aslant at about a 45 degree angle on the left frame below the cylinder latch. Perhaps this was because it was difficult to fit the entire marking on the frame in a level orientation.

Although the assumption is that these guns were shipped to the US Navy, none of the four had factory letter data and, thus, it cannot be said for certain that any or all were, in fact, Navy shipments.

In my Victory archives I located photos I had saved of the latter three guns. Here is V1170. (I did not record the source of any of the photos.)



Here is V2033, a gun that was later refinished to nickle.



And here is V2500.



All of the markings appear to be uniform in their style and application. I suspect that the same facility (or person) marked all of them.

Another oddity is that the NOD is marked with only a single period following the D, rather than N.O.D. or NOD with no following period.

The next obvious question is the meaning of the NOD acronym. A reasonable guess might be Naval Ordnance Depot. However, I have not been able to establish that the term "Naval Ordnance Depot" was in use during WW2. The Navy operated Naval Ammunition Depots, but I have not been able to locate "Naval Ordnance Depot" as a term used in WW2.
Perhaps it is a post-war term, or maybe it just means something other than what I have speculated here.

What about the number "1543"? I think we rule that out as a rack number since all four bear the same number. Perhaps the 1543 is part of the title of the facility itself. But where are the other 1542 such facilities?

Which brings us to the question of greatest significance: Is the marking a legitimate Navy marking at all or simply a fiction dreamed up by an imaginative gun faker? Regrettably, I can't answer that one. The comment in the thread on V73 mentioned that the gun was located in California, a state which once had a flourishing cottage industry of Victory fakers. The fact that a gun is now located in California is not, of course, at all sufficient to condemn it as a fake, but one wonders. For me, the jury is still out on whether this marking is genuine or not.

It is a bit of a mystery. The Database has helped us again by aggregating this information and allowing us to begin this discussion.

If anyone has any better or different information than what I have posited here, I'd invite you to post it. In particular, I would like to see if any of these 4 revolvers have factory or SWHF letters proving shipment to a Navy destination and where that destination was located.

On page 21 of the Summer 2017 S&WCA Journal (right column under The Fort Mason Shipment) mention is made of a billing to the Springfield Ordnance District (SOD).....

Might there have been a N...... Ordnance District (NOD)?
 
My thinking is that the apparently nonsensical nature of the inscription tends to speak against a fake.

So does the single period Charlie pointed out, which in proper English would mean that this is an abbreviation, not an acronym, and we have to look for a term or name starting with NOD.... Unfortunately, I haven't been able to get web searches for such terms or names to reveal even remotely promising candidates.

Of course, if these were inscribed at the same location and this is the creative mind of some individual armorer at work, it could mean Naval Ordnance or whatever.

The number is also unproductive. I suspected a ship, but all I've found was an Army LCU with the number 1543, and that wasn't put into service until 1954.

Anyone able to produce this text would have had no trouble producing a red-lettered Navy text instead, a fake much more likely to be profitable.
 
According to an online acronym finder NOd can refer to: Contract Written by Secretary of Navys Office. I suppose it would be an over simplification that these revolvers were ordered by the Navy for review purposes under contract or order number 1543.
 
The letters are perfect. Lined up straight, evenly cut, perfect in every way. I doubt they were done by hand. They look factory.

What would have been used to cut such nice letters with such square bottoms? They are not stamped just stamped in.
 
A few observations that may (or may not) be relevant:

1. There was no Naval Ordnance District. The Navy's procurement agencies were the Bureau of Ordnance, abbreviated as BuOrd and the Bureau of Supplies and Accounts, abbreviated BuS&A.

2. The markings aren't factory but appear to be cut be a pantograph machine very similar to the NYMI and "Red Navy" guns.

3. Prior to WWII Navy contracts had No or Nos prefixes. During WWII these changed to NX.

4. It would be helpful if one of the owners actually lettered one of these so perhaps we could learn the destination.
 
Thanks for the comments, guys.

BTW, I failed to mention in my original post that I had come up with another candidate, the Nansemond Ordnance Depot, in Virginia. However, I discarded that as a possibility because it was an Army facility, not Navy, and these guns clearly point to a Navy connection.

So, I am still scratching my head on this one.
 
Charlie
I just spoke to the Inside Sales Supervisor of a major United States Navy pump supplier. They have supplied the United States Navy with pumps since 1898. She said the NOD was for Naval Ordnance District. But, like you, she's not sure that those initials were used in WWII. Is the the only place they are stamped? I know Smith & Wesson stamped them U.S.Navy but not there. I think that stamp was applied by the Navy.
 
Interesting. Being a firefighter I have dabbled in firefighting equipment odds and ends. I had at one point a vintage (1940's) hose nozzle with a base mount pivot that I picked up at a federal surplus sale. It was marked NOD 1543 on the pivot mount and nozzle. I did research at the time I had it and came up with information that had me convinced that it was part of a US Navy contract from February, 1941 that was with the Seattle-Tacoma Shipbuilding Corp. to the tune of $5,000,000. Perhaps this is a lead someone would wish to follow.
 
Is the the only place they are stamped? I know Smith & Wesson stamped them U.S.Navy but not there. I think that stamp was applied by the Navy.

Hi Don:

Thanks for your message. I agree that the markings were applied after the guns left the factory. These markings on the left frame appear to be the only ones on the guns that are not factory applied.
 
Interesting. Being a firefighter I have dabbled in firefighting equipment odds and ends. I had at one point a vintage (1940's) hose nozzle with a base mount pivot that I picked up at a federal surplus sale. It was marked NOD 1543 on the pivot mount and nozzle. I did research at the time I had it and came up with information that had me convinced that it was part of a US Navy contract from February, 1941 that was with the Seattle-Tacoma Shipbuilding Corp. to the tune of $5,000,000. Perhaps this is a lead someone would wish to follow.

JH:

That is a very interesting tip. Thank you.

A quick Google search turned up a Worthpoint listing of an expired Ebay auction for a similar piece of brass firefighting equipment. Here is the blurb I extracted:

THIS VINTAGE PLAYPIPE IS IN GREAT SHAPE FOR ITS AGE WITH ALL THREADS WORKING SMOOTHLY. I BELIEVE THE CORDED PLAYPIPE IS AN S-211, THE SHORTER VERSION OF THE 211 STILL BEING MANUFACTURED BY ELKHART BRASS TODAY. THE PLAYPIPE IS JUST OVER 20" IN LENGTH WITH ALL THREE PIECES CONNECTED. AT THE BRASS BASE OF THE PLAYPIPE, IT IS CLEARLY MARKED "EUREKA FIRE HOSE" & "N O D 1543" & "USN PROP 10-41". THE RED CORD IS IN GREAT CONDITION OTHER THAN A LITTLE FADING IN SPOTS. THE BRASS PIECE WITH THE LEG & ELKHART EMBLEM IS ALSO CLEARLY MARKED "N O D 1543" & "U.S.N. PROP".

Although anything is possible it seems unlikely to me that a faker would use the same markings on a Victory Model as are found on this old piece of fire equipment. This lead may bear further investigation.
 
Here is the item Charlie (and I :)) just found. There is also a tool so marked on file as an ebay item, although none currently offered.

So I think indications are that this is a legitimate Navy marking, although we're no closer to the answer for what.
 

Attachments

  • NOD 1543 1.jpg
    NOD 1543 1.jpg
    52 KB · Views: 274
  • NOD 1543 2.JPG
    NOD 1543 2.JPG
    31.2 KB · Views: 149
I realize this is perhaps an ignorant question, but were pantographs in use during the WWII period? The markings are clearly done by that method.

The only other U.S. Navy markings I have seen were stamped on the topstrap, no "property" marking.

John

VICTORY2-1_zpsxj2hiosc.jpg
 
The letters are perfect. Lined up straight, evenly cut, perfect in every way. I doubt they were done by hand. They look factory.

What would have been used to cut such nice letters with such square bottoms? They are not stamped just stamped in.

Engraving machines have been in use for a very long time. Those were done with an engraving machine.
 
Engraving machines have been in use for a very long time. Those were done with an engraving machine.

Hoping not to get dinged, because I disagree with you. Smith & Wesson factory invoices say "STAMPED U S NAVY" Other invoices also read "Stamped" on police department orders, while others say "ENGRAVED". I've had the benefit of seeing original invoices, but, I still could be wrong.
 
Back
Top