Watertown MA Lock-down

Status
Not open for further replies.

luangtom

US Veteran
Joined
Feb 9, 2008
Messages
1,383
Reaction score
751
Location
North Hall County, GA
Anyone else suspect that the anti-Second Amendment folks will be using the Watertown MA lock-down to bolster their program? I am just waiting to hear from the FBI and MA State Police what sort of firearms the two jihadists had in their possession and how it will be spun by the spin-machine to their advantage. What sort of evil firearms did they use to shoot at law-enforcement?
 
Register to hide this ad
I agree. They will use this against us for certain. How did they get them? Where did they get them? What did they use?

Then they will blame the NRA and "shame" us again.
 
No Lock down Here

I have a new idea for a reality show. Turn a couple Jihadists loose here in Wyoming and see how long they last. I guarantee most of us here don't need to be "locked down" for our own safety!

SWCA #1834
 
Take him out to Fort Sill, 29 Plams etc, give him a 30 minute head start and then let the miltary sniper teams get in a liitle practice..
 
The title of the thread caught my attention
because I thought it might be questioning
the authority of calling the lockdown. But this
morning I finally heard some talk of if it might
have been a quasi martial law? It seems to be the
consensus that it was believed to be a voluntary
request. When they shut down the whole city then
started going door to door I started wondering, suppose
they had reason to believe some of the locals
were hiding such a person? A few twists in the story
and who knows. I keep thinking of New Orleans.
 
I agree with many...if this happened where I live...the locals would be his problem as they are all armed. This may make some of the anti's that were in water town think a little. This guy could have entered any house he wanted to ...and if the homeowner was not armed...they would just be another victim...and I bet many were wishing they had the means to defend themselves. Luckily...he hid in a boat...it could have gone the other way...and he could have taken hostages or just killed the home owner and who ever was in the house. At that point...he had nothing to lose as he had already killed others.
I think I can understand why the police did what they did and it may have been the best thing to do for the area they were in. There are many anti's in Mass. So most of the folks there were probably unarmed....but they may want to rethink that position when you realize how close to being a victim you really are. The police would not be able to save anyone if he entered their home...they would not be there in time. Its a tough situtation. In the rural area where I live...lock down would not happen...and the bomber would be at high risk if he approached many homes here. Something for folks to think about....and if he has an AR with 30m round mags....you may want to have as much firepower as he has. Be interesting to see what they had for arms.
 
Last edited:
A whole new issue would have been created had LEOs knocked on the door of a gun collector and/or reloader, seen a few firearms or had bomb sniffing dogs smell powder, then stormed the house.
 
You know it is only a matter of time before this is turned against us by the anti crowd. This morning Boston news reported that the powder for the bombs was scavenged from fireworks purchased in NH. Fireworks are illegal (yes illegal) here in MA so that will be a non issue for the powers to be to go after. We know it will be something else.

This event happened in the heart of Liberalism. If many of these folks would have encountered the perps they would have invited them inside to sit around the fireplace, sing kumbya and counsel them to the right path. I'm not kidding.
 
Last edited:
I will be suprised if they do not go after black powder...trouble is ....explosives can be made easily by anyone that knows what they are doing.....you can not stop evil people from hurting innocent people...you can just insure they never do it again to anyone else. Even if all explosives were banned .....just read the book shawdow warrior by David Everett and see what can be done by a trained SAS soldier that went to a life of crime in Australia. He managed to get anything he wanted for arms, ammo or explosives...and all of it was banned.
 
Last edited:
I will be suprised if they do not go after black powder...trouble is ....explosives can be made easily by anyone that knows what they are doing.....you can not stop evil people from hurting innocent people...you can just insure they never do it again to anyone else. Even if all explosives were banned .....just read the book shawdow warrior by David Everett and see what can be done by a trained SAS soldier that went to a life of crime in Australia. He managed to get anything he wanted for arms, ammo or explosives...and all of it was banned.

Another mass shooting incident, this time in Illinois, too bad!!! I mean even FoxNews nowdays has an anti-gun tone, we must be vigilant!

If I was in Watertown, I would have loaded by guns, just in case! But I would not shoot him unless he enters my house, and I would do it in a way to minimize the risk of me being shot by the cop!!!
 
If anyone bothers to read this-
Sticky: READ this > HOW to use the 2A Forum

you will see that it says this:

Note the subtitle of this forum is "2nd Amendment Issues & Discussion".


Ideally, we should see nothing here that does not pertain directly to protection of or expansion of 2nd Amendment RIGHTS.
That means this forum is about LEGISLATION and responses from legislators or the actions of legislators or about carry permit laws and issues.

/\ Read that AGAIN /\

Ask yourself if your thread fits one of those topics!
We are having to move too many threads.

LINKS:
Don't
post a bare link and say "You gotta see this!".
Tell me WHY I gotta see this with a paragraph or two.
That is the start of a discussion.
Posting a bare link is merely creating an internet index.
Any link posted should pertain directly
to protection of or expansion of 2nd Amendment RIGHTS.
If your link gets deleted, you either failed to describe its value, or it does not meet our standards.



This is NOT:

This is not where you post general political discussion and comments on OTHER issues not related to the 2A. Other issues are the economy, Obamacare, libs in general, tinfoil and black choppers, how to start a revolution, etc, etc. Keep it focused on the 2A issues.

This is not for the latest news about some scumbag shooting someone or getting arrested with a gun.

This is not where you post your latest AR or AK.

This is not for discussing gun and ammo prices or availability.

This is not where you post which movie stars or talking heads are currently bashing the 2nd Amendment.

This is not for the latest news on a gunowner using a gun lawfully for self dense, unless it is simply an OUTSTANDING situation that we can use in the halls of Congress.

This is not where you will fix everything wrong with our society.

What we SHOULD do here:
ALERT people to upcoming restrictive legislation at ANY level of government, and discuss and promote methods to fight it.

ALERT
people to upcoming legislation (if any) that is supportive of gun rights, ownership, and usage or carry.

INFORM
people on methods of being proactive in the fight, including encouragement to join the NRA or donate to it.

INFORM people on methods of fighting abuse of our rights. An example is the thread running about a newspaper publishing names and addresses of permit holders in New York. While that is legal, we all know it is meant to cause distress to those permit holders.

INFORM people on which legislators are pro gun and anti gun.

Post real and accurate data that would be useful in the fight.

In the coming months, we will have plenty to talk about that is spot-on for this forum. Let's keep the clutter down, and stay focused on the object.

I'll also remind you to heed the rules for this board. You can find them at the top of this forum.
Especially note these two-
5. Do NOT even think about implying, wishing, or stating ANY kind of harm or misfortune should befall ANY elected government official.
If you want to talk to the Secret Service, just call them up and leave me out of the middle.


6. Derogatory, Flippant, or Crude names for any government official will NOT be tolerated.
Respect the OFFICE, if not the holder.

That means the President of the United States will be referred to as the President, or by the accepted usage of his last name or initials- 'Obama' or 'BHO'. Other government officials will be afforded the same courtesy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top