I am willing to bet "gun guy's" rotate EDC guns much more than average LEO's do. I know many LEO's who see their duty weapon as just part of the uniform and have no interest in shooting it anymore than the bare minimum to qualify. "Gun Guy's" usually know more about guns than the average LEO's who carries as part of their job.
Not saying that here there aren't exceptions to the above (especially here on the S&W Forum), but just stating what I have seen over the years.
I ran the range for a 200 man department and with Smith revolvers would break it down this way.
The top 5% were exceptional shooters always scoring 95% or better.
The next 5% were very good and scored between 90-94%
The next 40% were good and scored 80-89%
The next 40% were meh and scored 70-79%
The last10% were frightful and a bane to my existence. When I finally got a junior sergeant assigned to training I made sure he got those trigger jerking lugheads.
That top 5% were definitely gun guys and always carried the same gun off duty. No rotation.
The next 5% would qualify with a couple of guns.
The next 80% didn't really care either way. Owned one or more but would only qualify with one.
The bottom 10% didn’t carry off duty or would carry the 4" mod.10. Few owned another gun and could never qualify with it anyway.
Overall I'd say the bottom 50% were those who considered a firearm just another 40oz. of weight to carry.
When we transitioned over to Sig DA/SA the scores across the board went up a few points. So did the number of rounds fired in comparable incidents.
Mysteriously so did the number of unreported bullet dents and holes in the locker room. Of those I could track down it was inevitable it came from a bottom 10%.
The above is why I really like revolvers, less chance of getting hit.
As another observation, 50 years ago you had to qualify out to 50 yards with a revolver. It's now down to 25 yards with auto loaders and sometimes a RDS. The lowering of standards is all over the place.