iowaMallard
Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2018
- Messages
- 38
- Reaction score
- 44
Right, yet fully automatic weapons were banned in the 1930's and most gun enthusiasts and 2nd Amendment advocates have somehow been duped into accepting that. Why?
The 2A does not recognize any differentials between "arms" and the men of those times were using firearms with the very latest technology available to them. I define "arms" as anything a man can reasonably carry and/or operate lest you think I am advocating for everyone to have a small, tactical nuclear missile in their back yard.
This is why any restrictions or outright bans of hi-cap pistols and "assault" rifles must be vigorously resisted because if allowed to go through for any length of time gun owners will at first become complacent and then later accepting just like they have with fully automatic weapons.
Right, yet fully automatic weapons were banned in the 1930's and most gun enthusiasts and 2nd Amendment advocates have somehow been duped into accepting that. Why?
Not banned but extraordinarily expensive, which is the point. Joe
Please watch and share this video. Very well put together. I can’t believe how low the views are.
Now days when $200 isn't that expensive, I think they want to persuade people by making them wait up to 14 months for a tax stamp.
I have a Trapdoor assault rifle, but it's low capacity...
Priced an MP 5 lately? Pre 1986 legislation, a new one was $1500, which I thought was high at the time. Conversions were a couple hundred plus the stamp. When they had gun shows @ Tupperware hq, a guy had a new, complete 50 cal M2HB for $2495 w/ tripod. The hardware got expensive due to .gov meddling. Joe
Now days when $200 isn't that expensive, I think they want to persuade people by making them wait up to 14 months for a tax stamp.
Last one I got took 5 months, and I thought that was a long time.
Seems like after you had 1 $200 tax stamp, they could just do a quick background check to see if anything had changed since the last one.