Low (?) 459 But Definitely "Low" 669
S&W could certainly have set aside all the A840xxx range ONLY for the 469, that's possible. Does anyone have a very early 459 or 669 to compare what that SN range is in?
Greetings and Hallucinations To All,
I've a NIB Model 459 @ SN A881284 but it isn't identified by S&W as a "Low Number" as is a NIB Model 669 @ SN TAE001 in my possession as well.
An aside to a previous post or three concerning the order in which S&W made its pistols: While I wasn't there, it is understood by this poster (hmmm, remember Farah Fawcett's?)(er, I guess that's not the same thing, huh?) . . . well, anyway, somewhere within the bowels of at least the last two (Nos. 3 and 4) and possibly all four SCSWs is a discussion of the method in which serial numbers were added to frames and it was seemingly haphazard, at best, in that SN No. 001 might actually be finished/produced
after SN No. 018 (both herein being BS serial nos.), and, indeed, offered was a specific example of how an existing higher serial number was produced/shipped something on the order of one-year prior to a an existing lower SN.
That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
Later.