What is difference between 629 CLASSIC and CLASSIC DX?

A run of the mill Classic 629-4 topped with a JPoint, my whitetail gun.

IMG_1225_zpsa1c7c743.jpg
 
Bought used some 20 yrs. ago 6 1/2 in. 29-5 rb Classic not DX. Full lug, interchangeable front sight but no extra ones supplied.Original Houge medallion grips split apart after hundreds of rounds shot one weekend. No kidding, tennis elbow for a year afterwards More accurate than me, still tight after all these years and a great shooter
 
I have owned 7 or 8 of the 629 Classic DX revolvers over the last 5 or so years. Hand picked three to keep (one of each barrel length). Most of mine were 629-3 models.

The earlier ones (629-3 and early to mid 629-4 production and 29-5) had to keep 5 shots under 2" at 50 yards. The later production ones were tested to keep 5 shots in 1.5" at 25 yards. Its safe to say the earlier ones were held to a higher standard.

They came with test targets, 5 front sights and two sets of grips, morado wood finger groove combat and hogue rubber round to square conversion with silver emblems on earlier models and non silver emblem same hogue rubber on later models. The later model wood combats were also missing the silver emblems.

Had one early 629-4 with a .6" 5 shot group at 50 yards. My others range from 1-1.5" with 5 shots at 50 yards.

I have no doubt that they were hand selected for best accuracy. They also seem to have extra care in fit and lockup.

The 5" barrel length 29 Classic DX and 629 Classic DX revolvers were only made for one year. 1992. And yes they also came with test targets.

29 Classic DX models were only made under the -5 variation. Far fewer 29 Classic DX models were produced than 629 Classic DX models and the 5" 29 Classic DX had the lowest production numbers of all the DX models.

629 Classic DX models were offered in -3,-4 , -5 and early -6 model variants..
 
Last edited:
I have a 629-2 that isn't labelled as a Classic or a DX. It shoots great out to 175 yards. That's the distance I could shoot a center mass size group with the only rest a post I was leaning the gun against. Actually it was a gallon jug I was shooting. It's plenty good enough for bear defense duty which is why I carry it sometimes in certain areas. My farm is over run with bears these days. Heck they're all around my house too. But they aren't aggressive or haven't been so far. I carry it "just in case". You never know.

I always understood the DX to be a model picked because of it's accuracy. I've also heard it said that the testing was quick and simple and wasn't really a good indication of which guns would ultimately shoot better. I got that info from this board several years ago right after I bought that handgun.
 
As advertised by Smith&Wesson with the introduction of the Classic line of revolvers and as well as the catalogs at the time it was stated that the Classic full lug series as a whole were designed with increased accuracy over the standard non full lugged models of .44 mags.



The accuracy testing of the DX models was with only 5 cylinders and with only one factory load so it is possible to have non DX models that are/were just as accurate with loads tailored to the individual revolver. It would be interesting but if testing were performed I believe overall that the DX models would still on average come out ahead.

The 29 and 629 Classic revolvers as a whole are known for their accuracy.


CJ- is your 629-2 full lugged/non fluted cylinder? It could be a first run "classic Hunter" which pre dated the classic and classic dx models by a year or so.
 
Last edited:
Of the numerous DX targets l have seen, ALL were shot with
Federal 44Mag ammo..Federal 240gr JHP is the GOLD STANDARD
for 44 magnum..Obviously Smith & Wesson thinks so too...


btw ...Federal 44 Mag 240 JHP and American Eagle 44 mag
are NOT the same
 
Eagle Guns,

The DX test targets that I have seen were all marked 50yards but I have not seen a DX that was made recently enough to have MIM parts like yours. Your target is marked 1999. My SCSW isn't handy to look up when DXs were dropped. Perhaps your was near the end of production and the distance was reduced by then.

That is a very nice 25 yard group.

Gil

The early guns were 50yds at 1.5", the later guns were 25 yds at 1". Those early 29 DX's are gorgeous guns, fit and finish are as good as anything you will look at. The 29s gave way to the 629's and I believe they produced the 629 DX to a later date than the 29 DX??
 
This thread is now 5 years old and this stuff is not as fresh in my memory. As I recall during the 1990s S&W discontinued all blued revolvers for a while so it is correct to write most any stainless model was made longer than its blued equivalent in that time period. They also discontinued square butts on all revolvers. Of course blued revolvers and square butts were both reintroduced.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top