What is the effective range of a typical red dot sight

307-Niner

Member
Joined
May 11, 2014
Messages
928
Reaction score
1,472
Location
Wyoming
Like Eotech or Aimpoint (or other popular quality brands) without magnification devices? I'm curious as I have never used one before, actually never even seen one besides in pictures.
 
Register to hide this ad
Depends on the shooter and the size of the dot. A 1MOA dot will be much easier to shoot well at 400 yards than a 5MOA dot.

I happen to feel we over power ourselves when we put optics on our rifles. My longest shots on game have been at 400+ yards with a variable scope set on 2x.
 
I'd say it's a matter of what you want to be able to see. Obviously no red dot is going to give you equivalent precision to, say a good 3-9x scope...

But I run two that sort of qualify. The first is one of those little $95 Bushnell TRS-25 1x red dots on a 15-22. I shoot it quite a lot as an understudy to 5.56. The 3 MOA dot works ok for me out to 200 yards, covering 6" of a silhouette target.

The other is a TA-33 ACOG (3X) with a 4 MOA red dot in a horseshoe reticle. The dot is intended for use out to 200 yards...top of dot is 100, bottom is 200, and 300 is the top of a vertical post below those.

I also use a 4 MOA amber triangle reticle, which with a 50 yard zero give a trajectory that is usable out to 250 yards or so.

I'd say they're at their best from contact distance to 200 or so yards. The 3 MOA dot works best for me.

And that little Bushnell sight is a good performer and one heckuva bargain.
 
Last edited:
I've shot my eotech to about 250M with my AR. Able to hit a pistol silhouette target fairly easy.
 
Last edited:
It depends on your eyesight and reticle... for example, the Eotech 557 has dots for holdover out to 600 meters. I doubt that I could easily identify a target at 600 meters with my eyesight.
 
It depends on your eyesight and reticle... for example, the Eotech 557 has dots for holdover out to 600 meters. I doubt that I could easily identify a target at 600 meters with my eyesight.

This really sums it up. The red dot sight saves your eyes the work of pushing front sight and rear sight into one plane, but without magnification you can still only see as far as your eyes will let you, plus on the less expensive models, you lose some light since red dot sights don't gather light like a good scope, and in less than ideal lighting conditions that is a limiting factor. I have been in last-light situations where I could still see a deer clearly with the naked eye but did not feel confident in taking a shot through my (admittedly not top-of-the-line) red dot sight.
 
I don't believe I would be shooting past 300 yards.

Is a red dot sight a good option to pull double-duty on an AR15 type rifle? Meaning close-in (home defense) and targets/varmints out to a few hundred yards?
 
1x red dot is designed for fast target acquisition. Unlimited field of view and eye relief. I use mine as an offhand shooting point and click aiming device 0--250.
 
I don't believe I would be shooting past 300 yards.

Is a red dot sight a good option to pull double-duty on an AR15 type rifle? Meaning close-in (home defense) and targets/varmints out to a few hundred yards?

Can you see those targets/varmints out to a few hundred yards without magnification?

I use a red dot on a rifle for hogs, but my shots are no more than 100 yards... typically about 50 yards.

As Phil indicated, they are designed for fast target acquisition, not really precision shooting. They can be used for hitting a man sized target at 300 yards, but doubt you would hit a prairie dog consistently at that distance without magnification.
 
Like Eotech or Aimpoint (or other popular quality brands) without magnification devices? I'm curious as I have never used one before, actually never even seen one besides in pictures.

For me, about 80 yards.

100 yards on a good day.

I'm getting to the point in life where I need magnification to reliably hit anything past that. Getting old(er) rules!
 
As noted, size of dot. Also size of target, contrast between target and surroundings, available light and time. How big are the vermin you plan to shoot? Quality of the sight figures into this along with the adjustments on the brightness. The dots tend to bloom (grow apparently larger in size) if overly bright for the lighting and target contrast.

With a properly sighted in dot type sight, you can safely assume the bullet strike will be within the dot or very close to it at practical ranges.

Red dot sights are very popular for hunting in some areas of the world. You don't need a 3-9 scope to whack deer sized game at 50 yards.
 
In theory, as far as you can shoot iron sights. Eyesight is the first limiting factor. As noted you can't hit what you can't see. Some degree of trade off in the size of the dot /other retecule. Really large dot somewhat quicker at pistol distances, 1 moa -ish more precise a longer distances.

Back in the day , say 1950's into early '60s , a fixed 2.5-2.75X scope was still considered an all around big game scope.

I was influenced at impressionable age by my father , who was more than a bit of an at least selective throwback himself. For him, a 4X was a long range scope , making first shot hits on game at 700 + yds.

I really like a good 2.5X scope.enought magnification for 200yd plus shots , yetwide field of view for fast aquisition at anything beyond room distances. It won't be the perminent set up , but for the moment have a 2.5X mounted on 10.5in AR .
 
I really like a good 2.5X scope.enought magnification for 200yd plus shots , yetwide field of view for fast aquisition at anything beyond room distances. It won't be the perminent set up , but for the moment have a 2.5X mounted on 10.5in AR .

I fully agree with this. I just pulled the trigger on a PA 2.5X and think it will be perfect. Enough magnification to see at greater distances, but not so much as to lose field of vision up closer.
 
Last edited:
1x red dot also helps with older eyes.

At about 40 I began to struggle with irons on my recreational guns. 1x red dot made shooting a pleasure again. Just focus down range and the dot is there.
 
When we move out of town to our 40 acre property, we will have some animals. Chickens, pigs, horses, maybe goats & a couple cows. There are coyotes in the area, also raccoons, jackrabbits, etc. My property is basically a 1320 x 1320 foot square, don't believe I'll be shooting at anything off my property.

Sounds like I need to look into a 1MOA 1x red dot. Any suggestions for a good one?
 
I think a scope with some magnification would be better suited for your use.

The Eotech has a 1 MOA dot that is centered in a 65 MOA circle to assist with quick acquisition of the dot. I'm not sure, but I think the smallest dot that Aimpoint offers is a 2 MOA, which is still very good... however the disadvantage to a reticle with a small dot only is that it is harder to pick up the dot, especially in bright daylight.

I bet that if you go with the red dot, you will end up looking at a magnifier to go behind it at some point, which means you should have went with a low power scope to begin with, IMO.
 
My thinking on an AR is that it is a battle rifle.

Shooting offhand, I want to be able to bring the rifle up, put the dot on a 16in plate at 200yds and click all within about second or so, then engage multiple targets from 50 to 100. Don't really care where the bullet strikes steel as long as it does. Optic is on 24/7/365 never off other than battery change every few years, never adjust optic, never use holdover, just pick up the rifle point and click. I use an Aimpoint H1. Others prefer EOTech. We're talking battle rifle. I live in the woods. Someone living in the desert would likely have a different opinion about it.

For those who want to shoot from a supported position and make tight groups on paper, a magnified optic is the way to go.

Hunting depends on what and where you're hunting.
 
Last edited:
When we move out of town to our 40 acre property, we will have some animals. Chickens, pigs, horses, maybe goats & a couple cows. There are coyotes in the area, also raccoons, jackrabbits, etc. My property is basically a 1320 x 1320 foot square, don't believe I'll be shooting at anything off my property.

Sounds like I need to look into a 1MOA 1x red dot. Any suggestions for a good one?

OK, you've got a 1/4 mile square. Wooded? Hilly? Pool table flat & cleared?

To reach out for threatening 'yotes in a pasture, an AR is a decent option-terrain permitting. Coons and jacks are barnyard pests, a .22 lr in rifle or pistol would probably be better.

I've been using Aimpoints for 30 years and still have my original and it's still in use. The PRO (patrol rifle optic) is hard to beat given all it's features and the price. If you look around you can find it around or under $400. The 9000 series short version can be found for substantially under that but doesn't have the years long constant on battery life. If I hadn't got a really good deal on a PRO, I'd have gone for the 9000SC(?).

Cheap optics can cost you way more in the long run. Saving bucks on a sight and hitting your livestock instead of the 'yote because the point of impact changed is false economy-and hard to explain to the wife.

BTW, scopes can be a decent choice, but unless you spend major bucks for an illuminated reticle (or massive objective), you're limited in low light situations. Vermin generally don't care about time of day. You may also want to look a light mounts- game regs generally don't apply when protecting livestock.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top