1BadSmith
Member
Maybe it's just me, but other than 115 grain being everywhere, you really had to search for 124 or 147 grain it seems like, now it's popping up all over. What gives? Just curious.
Mike, I kind of think 9mm 115 FMJ isn't going to go lower than perhaps $.28-$.30 per round any time soon. I am talking US made brass cased ammo only.Still priced too high.
The true US NATO 9mm 124 gr was only made at the Winchester Oxford, MS plant. It has an internally sealed bullet and a sealed primer. The head stamp is always WMA 14 and a NATO Cross. Box Part Number is Q4318.124 Grain is the NATO standard and was the initial loading for the Luger in 9 mm back in the 1910 time frame. NATO armies use it but the US ? It also is "faster" than the 119 under standard conditions. Look for the little star on the rim of NATO 9mm and it will be 124 grain. Dave_n
You got it. That is exactly what I found out from a Winchester Rep who was in my LGS years ago. The Q4318.MIL contract overruns would be my guess.
124 Grain is the NATO standard and was the initial loading for the Luger in 9 mm back in the 1910 time frame. NATO armies use it but the US ? It also is "faster" than the 119 under standard conditions. Look for the little star on the rim of NATO 9mm and it will be 124 grain. Dave_n
I think you are correct on the M882 as I recall.NATO standard is actually a range of weights, not a specific one such as 124. For some years, the US version was the Winchester Q4318, 124 gr. and marked 9mm NATO. In recent years, it seems to get mid-to-high 1100 fps velocity out of service sized pistols. It is being replaced (mostly) by the M1152 round (also loaded by Winchester), a hot 115 gr. flat-nosed FMJ that breaks 1300 fps in the M17 pistol.
Edit to add: I believe the Q4318 is officially called M882.