Which .22 plinker should I go for?

rte148

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
91
Reaction score
3
Location
Farmville, Southside VA
I'm in the market for a semi-auto plinker and these seem to be the best for me esp. pricewise. I'm really torn as these seem to be equal in overall strengths/weakness. I'd like to stick with Smith, but am keeping an open mind.

Any suggestions? All opinions expressed have my gratitude.

all 5.5" barrels, unless there's a good reason for a different length.

S&W M22A

Ruger 22/45 or MkIII

Browning Buckmark
 
Register to hide this ad
I always enjoyed my Ruger MK II target model. Wish I had never sold it. Isn't that the way it always goes?
 
I have the the S&W (22S) and Ruger 22/45. Have shot the BM many times. They are all fine plinkers.

I am partial to Ruger .22 pistols. Some will tell you that the Ruger is horrible to take down. I have many tens of thousands of rounds through mine and have never had the need to do so. Lot's of information and opinion in the semi-auto pistol Forum.
 
The Ruger or the Browning Buckmark would be great choices. They have different grip angles,so you should try them both out. There are several variations of each one.
 
I have a Smith 22A, with the bull bbl, wood grips and put a red dot sight on it. I couldn't ask for a more fun gun for the money. It is hands down the best investment I ever made. It would be one of the last guns I would ever sell. I've shot the MKIII, and I prefer the Smith, no real reason why just a personal preference I guess.
 
Why a semi auto? Why not a quality revolver?? I've moved away from my two autos and shoot nothing but the K-22 and a M-18 for quarry plinking duty.

Then again...neither of the three autos are the WRONG choice. All of them fine. Win/Win!

FN in MT
 
I am kicking myself for not buying a Brwoming with the GREEn fiber optic front sight that was offered to me at a NICE price last year ...

All three are great plinkers.

Bekeart
 
I like my S&W 22a. It shot great right outta the box.

CB
 
I'd suggest the Browning. It feels the most comfortable, and there is very little to go wrong. We have nearly worn out the one I got about 13 years ago- or at least, the disconnector, not the whole gun. :D I figure it's had over 100K rounds through it...the outside wear on the grip frame is worn down to the aluminum in places where it's been gripped so much, and there is no blue left on the slide where it has to be gripped. It's handled every other day.
 
Look around for a Ruger M II. The best 22 for the money ever.

The Buckmarks are nice also but not as solid as the Ruger. The Ruger M 3 is not the same gun as the M 2.
 
I have a Ruger Mark II stainless slab side - a super fine 22. I picked up a Ruger RST 6 - standard pistol 6" bbl (only the target models were stamped Mark I) this weekend traded a M66 6" and got the pistol and cash.

I shot it today Ruger reliable, and great with Win 333s and Rem Target.

I would not give up my 5 screw K22 or M18-2 easily but if the right trade came along - maybe.

C/R JPG
 
I have a Smith 41, A Buckmark 5.5 Bull BBL, and am in the market for a Mark II. The Ruger's trigger pull isn't up to the others, but it is all around the best plinker, IMHO
 
Yes.
Rugerpistolstwo8209.jpg

Joe
 
+1!

The Mk II is head and shoulders above the Mk III.

I'm looking for the same thing as the OP. Something a little less expensive to practice and target shoot with. Why is the Mark 2 head and shoulders above the the Mark 3? How about the Mark 3 Target model # 10103 catalog number KMKIII512 ?

Tech23
 

Latest posts

Back
Top