Who do you think the greatest living Actor is thesedays?

...(Brando still alive?)...
As the ringo kid noted, sadly Brando is no longer with us or he would've been my pick for greatest living actor; he's my pick for greatest actor, period.

I love threads like these but have to note it's devolving into "actors we like a lot", and away from "greatest living"; lotta likable names popping up that nonetheless have no business being near the phrase "greatest living actor".

And a note on Eastwood: I love him backwards, forwards and upside down for his career and all the things he's done in it, but the fact is he's not an actor, he's a star, and has crafted a star persona that he portrays -- with little variation -- quite well over and over. At that he is great, but a great actor he isn't; he's actually quite limited, but sagely built a stellar career around his limitations.

And a man's got to know his limitations. ;)
 
POST # 88, MOVIE HEAT

I agree a great movie with GREAT casting & acting by all PACINO (not Duvall), Diniro, Kilmer, even Sizemore. Some great performances can be pulled from some normally "not so great" performers. I can't stand Robin Williams as his shtick is soo old, but he has given some very good dramatic performances as many comedians seem to be able to unexpectedly, now and again. (Jackie Gleason).
 
As the ringo kid noted, sadly Brando is no longer with us or he would've been my pick for greatest living actor; he's my pick for greatest actor, period.

I love threads like these but have to note it's devolving into "actors we like a lot", and away from "greatest living"; lotta likable names popping up that nonetheless have no business being near the phrase "greatest living actor".

And a note on Eastwood: I love him backwards, forwards and upside down for his career and all the things he's done in it, but the fact is he's not an actor, he's a star, and has crafted a star persona that he portrays -- with little variation -- quite well over and over. At that he is great, but a great actor he isn't; he's actually quite limited, but sagely built a stellar career around his limitations.

And a man's got to know his limitations. ;)

I would some what agree about Eastwood with these glaring exceptions.....Grand Torino, The Bridges of Madison County, Unforgiven, and Escape from Alcatraz...I think Eastwood had to set aside his persona to do those movies....Out of character for him some would say Unforgiven was typical, but I say not. No glamor, No heroic action, yes some action, but not Eastwood type of action.
 
Clint Eastwood is number one
Gene Hackman is number two
Denzel Washington is number three
Anthony Hopkins is number four
Pee Wee Herman is number gazillion
 
Just because Clint Eastwood never put on tights and played Peter Pan does not make him a bad or untalented actor in my view. Perhaps he was type cast or perhaps he just preferred masculine roles. That doesn't mean that he didn't play the part that was written with skill, humor or talent. Tom Hanks is a brilliant actor and the weight that he lost for Castaway was amazing, but I still don't think that his body of work is as vast as Eastwoods even if many of the roles were similar.
 
I don't think Johnny Depp is being given enough credit.
Any one that can do Donnie Brasco and then do an equally good job as Captain Jack Sparrow is a damned good actor.

Otherwise


Hackman
Jennifer Lawrence
Kevin Spacey

Hannibal Lector is over rated, nearly hammy. Yes every time I think of Hopkins I remember that liver and Chianti line. Way over the top. For some reason I still enjoy that movie.
 
When I think GREAT actors-I think of movies that I'd go see just based on who's in it.
Leonardo Dicaprio is one.
Jack Nicholson is another
Al Pachino
Robert Dinero
Johnny Depp
I also like Robert Downy Jr.
Kevin Spacey

As far as THE greatest living actor however-that would be me as day in and day out I convince everyone around me that I actually give a hoot.
 
Clint Eastwood is number one
Gene Hackman is number two
Denzel Washington is number three
Anthony Hopkins is number four
Pee Wee Herman is number gazillion

Mentioning Pee Wee Herman gives me an idea------for another thread. :D
 
Criteria is living, actor (male)=ignore politics, directing, etc.. I have to say diversity in roles is crucial.

Eastwood is like Kostner==he mostly does Eastwood (I know, Beguiled is an exception).

Kostner plays Kostner. His Wyatt Earp was "Wyatt Earp plays Kevin Kostner" more than the other way around.

I have to go with Kevin Spacey, I think. Largely based on Glengarry Glen Ross and Usual Suspects.

Actress: Helen Mirren, I think.

But, my opinion might change by tomorrow.

He spells it Costner, but his Robin Hood really upset some British viewers. Just not plausible. Errol Flynn (long gone now) was Australian-born and was a good Robin. Richard Greene on TV, less so, but okay for a typical TV show.

Sir Anthony Hopkins should be more mentioned here.

One fellow mentioned "Sir" Richard Burton. He was a really impressive actor and perhaps because he was Welsh, was chosen to read the narration in, "Zulu." (The troops in the film were from a Welsh regiment, as in real life.)

But I don't think he was ever knighted. He took the name of a famous explorer, who WAS knighted. THAT Sir Richard Burton was also an author and a skilled swordsman.

Actresses? Oh, sure: Judi Dench and Helen Mirren. Meryl Streep. ATTRACTIVE acresses? Amanda Seyfried. Lara Cox (Australian, very versatile and much better than her roles have usually let her prove, although she aced them), and (seriously) that blonde (Sharon Stone) who made her name by uncrossing her legs in, "Basic Instinct." But she really is a good actress. She just needed a movie that'd let her become famous.

My granddaughter wants to act and is taking college drama courses. I think she'll be very good. She has a good heritage. Goodness knows, I saw enough drama from her mom as a teen, ha!

I don't like Michael Douglas for more than his anti-gun stance, which applies to most actors and other celebs. But he overacts, using emotion in lieu of talent. That seems to affect other actors in his movies, too. "Basic Instinct" had a lot of unrequired drama. His bi-polar wife is an excellent actress. So far, I haven't seen her medical condition ruin her roles. (Catherine Zeta-Jones)

Kenneth Branagh is very good in roles that suit him, as in, "Henry V".

Richard Burton was good, but he also sometimes overdid the raging emotion, as when he played Marc Antony in, "Cleopatra." But, he gets extra credit for having his sword sharpened in case he or his lover and co-star Elizabeth Taylor were attacked on the set by some Italian actors and crew who were having a labor dispute during the filming of, "Cleopatra." Taylor played the title role. She told a magazine the story of the sharp sword. I forget if he had the prop sword sharpened or bought a new sword for the purpose. Taylor said that she didn't know what he thought he'd do with the sharp sword. I think Burton knew exactly what he''d do, if forced to!
 
Last edited:
^^^^ Sharon Stone :)

Another female great is Sally Fields. She can play humor and she made a movie (don't recall the name) with Kiefer Sutherland very dramatic.
 
As I've looked through all these replies and I don't think anyone--myself included--has mentioned Jodie Foster. I should have said her name and Johnny Depp's in my first response. And as I said before, I'm leaving personal politics and sexual preferences out of it--just acting talent.
 
Neeson, Spacey, Blanchette and P. Hoffman

Very unfortunately he is not living, but I've long been a big fan of Phillip Seymour Hoffman. Among those living and still working, I like Liam Neeson, Kevin Spacey (especially in American Beauty) and since females are now in the mix, Cate Blanchette.
 
Great Actor. Being a conservative doesn't make you a great actor, nor does it make you a great human being. The roles they have taken, doesn't make them any better either. I will say there is no such thing as a great movie or television actor, since they do just what they are told by the director, from the script, and get as many takes as necessary until the director gets what he wants. That's not talent. The only great actors would be stage actors, who perform live.
 
Jim Parsons? :D

Seriously, I'm not sure how you define greatness but the there are 2 actors that I have never seen in a movie that I didn't like, they are Sandra Bullock and Tom Hanks

Couldn't care less about their politics they are good at their job
 
Back
Top