Who is John Galt???

buckeyefist

Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2011
Messages
88
Reaction score
90
Location
ohio
"Atlas Shrugged" is a novel written over 50 years ago by Ayn Rand. For those not familiar with the book, the hero was a man by the name of John Galt, who promised to stop the world from the direction it was heading.

I will not ruin the story for those who have not read it. Please do if you havent already. The book is very long so mabye an audio version might serve some better.

Ayn's work is a fountain of freedom loving ideas and full of quotes that go far beyond any one paticular subject, but encompass all personal liberties that are as endangered now as they were in yesteryear.

I have included an abridged quote here from Atlas shrugged for your reading pleasure, the context of the situation is John Galt speaking to the "Government" after the country is in near collapse. and again, please try to find time to read the book!

John Galt's Speech,mini-version.

For twelve years you've been asking "Who is John Galt?" This is John Galt speaking. I'm the man who's taken away your victims and thus destroyed your world. You've heard it said that this is an age of moral crisis and that Man's sins are destroying the world. But your chief virtue has been sacrifice, and you've demanded more sacrifices at every disaster. You've sacrificed justice to mercy and happiness to duty. So why should you be afraid of the world around you?

Your world is only the product of your sacrifices. While you were dragging the men who made your happiness possible to your sacrificial altars, I beat you to it. I reached them first and told them about the game you were playing and where it would take them. I explained the consequences of your 'brother-love' morality, which they had been too innocently generous to understand. You won't find them now, when you need them more than ever.

We're on strike against your creed of unearned rewards and unrewarded duties. If you want to know how I made them quit, I told them exactly what I'm telling you tonight. I taught them the morality of Reason – that it was right to pursue one's own happiness as one's principal goal in life. I don't consider the pleasure of others my goal in life, nor do I consider my pleasure the goal of anyone else's life.

I am a trader. I earn what I get in trade for what I produce. I ask for nothing more or nothing less than what I earn. That is justice. I don't force anyone to trade with me; I only trade for mutual benefit. Force is the great evil that has no place in a rational world. One may never force another human to act against his/her judgment. If you deny a man's right to Reason, you must also deny your right to your own judgment. Yet you have allowed your world to be run by means of force, by men who claim that fear and joy are equal incentives, but that fear and force are more practical.

You've allowed such men to occupy positions of power in your world by preaching that all men are evil from the moment they're born. When men believe this, they see nothing wrong in acting in any way they please. The name of this absurdity is 'original sin'. That's inmpossible. That which is outside the possibility of choice is also outside the province of morality. To call sin that which is outside man's choice is a mockery of justice. To say that men are born with a free will but with a tendency toward evil is ridiculous. If the tendency is one of choice, it doesn't come at birth. If it is not a tendency of choice, then man's will is not free.

And then there's your 'brother-love' morality. Why is it moral to serve others, but not yourself? If enjoyment is a value, why is it moral when experienced by others, but not by you? Why is it immoral to produce something of value and keep it for yourself, when it is moral for others who haven't earned it to accept it? If it's virtuous to give, isn't it then selfish to take?

Your acceptance of the code of selflessness has made you fear the man who has a dollar less than you because it makes you feel that that dollar is rightfully his. You hate the man with a dollar more than you because the dollar he's keeping is rightfully yours. Your code has made it impossible to know when to give and when to grab.

You know that you can't give away everything and starve yourself. You've forced yourselves to live with undeserved, irrational guilt. Is it ever proper to help another man? No, if he demands it as his right or as a duty that you owe him. Yes, if it's your own free choice based on your judgment of the value of that person and his struggle. This country wasn't built by men who sought handouts. In its brilliant youth, this country showed the rest of the world what greatness was possible to Man and what happiness is possible on Earth.

Then it began apologizing for its greatness and began giving away its wealth, feeling guilty for having produced more than its neighbors. Twelve years ago, I saw what was wrong with the world and where the battle for Life had to be fought. I saw that the enemy was an inverted morality and that my acceptance of that morality was its only power. I was the first of the men who refused to give up the pursuit of his own happiness in order to serve others.

To those of you who retain some remnant of dignity and the will to live your lives for yourselves, you have the chance to make the same choice. Examine your values and understand that you must choose one side or the other. Any compromise between good and evil only hurts the good and helps the evil.

If you've understood what I've said, stop supporting your destroyers. Don't accept their philosophy. Your destroyers hold you by means of your endurance, your generosity, your innocence, and your love. Don't exhaust yourself to help build the kind of world that you see around you now. In the name of the best within you, don't sacrifice the world to those who will take away your happiness for it.

The world will change when you are ready to pronounce this oath:
I swear by my Life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man,
nor ask another man to live for the sake of mine.

Text courtesy of Daryl J. Sroufe
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Ayn Rand was a Profit.............it is scary how timely that book is, especially since it was written 50 years ago. The 'victims' and 'takers' are in charge now...........I'm beginning to believe that a revolution may be the only salvation.
 
also from Ayn Rand...

I've been using this line from A.R. to close some of my letters to legislators. Seems to fit the times, and situation, to a tee.


“Individual rights are not subject to a public vote; a majority has no right to vote away the rights of a minority; the political function of rights is precisely to protect minorities from oppression by majorities (and the smallest minority on earth is the individual).” – Ayn Rand.
 
Buckeyefist, if it were possible to "Like" a post more than once, I
would sure do so here. Thank you very much for posting.
 
Last year I read Atlas Shrugged. Very insightful reading.

Today the "takers" are in charge; voting themselves and their followers "bread and circuses".
 
Probably a necessary read these days but a slog to get through. Hayek covers about the same ground minus the contrived plot. But I sure don't discourage anyone from tackling it.

Plato's "Republic" is an eye-opener, and I wish to hell I had read Aristotle's "Nichomachean Ethics" about 50 years ago. The old "Life is tough, it's tougher if you're stupid" bit.

The point is to crack open some good books that contain truth and blow some of the fog away. Somebody once said that the only value of an education is to know when a man is talking nonsense.

I learned that; I was just a slow learner. Make that real slow.

"The preachers and the teachers of this land
They'd love to help you and shape you
And help you be a man
All you've got to do is sign on that same old dotted line"

Hank Snow sang it...
 
John Gault

I have listend to Johns speach at least twenty times and still amazed at the relevance to today
 
Excellent book, I read it in 1969, still have the old paperback on my book shelf. I saw an old black and white film on TV not too long ago.
Steve W
 
I have watched part one of the series..

Not bad, but as with any book based movie they leave alot out. The actors are B actors at best. But as i said i have only seen the first part.

The book is amazing, yes quite long, and at times a little "long winded". But a MUST READ for any liberty loving individual.
 
I enjoyed part 1 of the movie. Part 2 has an almost entirely different cast for whatever reason (budget, schedules) so I'm not so excited about seeing it. The actress playing Dagney in part 2 is 14 years older than the actress in part 1.
 
14 years older?!?!?!?..............jeeeeezzzz......

Its another daggone government conspiracy, turn one of the greatest literary acheivments in our time into a cheesy movie so no one will pay any attention to it.....

Atlas shrugged should be passed down like a family bible. It is a shame what gets media attention and what doesnt.
 
Back
Top