Great guns, gentlemen. As a kid, I always liked the Beretta...thanks to the references to Beretta in the early Bond novels and their appearance on "The Saint" and other shows of that period, not to mention the number of toys based on the Beretta. When the US adopted the M-9, I was mortified , of course.
In the late '80s, I was intrigued by the M-9/92/92FS...these pistols were then the choice of LAPD, LASD, among others...not to mention film favorites ("Lethal Weapon" and "Die Hard"). But then, I heard horror stories about the slides cracking and learned the SEALs preferred the Sig-Sauer P226.
The 92 seemed big to me, too. I stuck with my Browning Hi-Power and later the Sig P228 (my first issued duty gun). In the Academy, one of my instructors, a wonderful shot, was a former Beretta demonstration shooter. He claimed the 92 was more accurate than the Sig P-226/228.
My ex, an LAPD officer, swore by her 92FS...though she eventually switched to personally owned Glocks, she still has the same Deparment issued 92FS, a very salty looking pistol indeed.
In the last couple of years, I purchased a 1934 in .380 from the 1960s and a WW II era 1935 in .32. Research revealed that the Beretta Fleming probably had in mind for Bond was the little 418, a .25. I found one of these, too. The 1934/35 are great little pistols and totally reliable. The 418 is a neat little gun, too.
Finally, I decided to try the 92 and bought a new one, marked M-9. High quality pistol...and no, it's NOT too big, after all. A great gun, with lineage back to the Walther P-38. Old school and Modern at once. I haven't shot it yet, but I'm looking forward to shooting it alongside my Sig P226 and see how they compare, see if my old instructor was right, after all.