davidj
Member
The model 64 is "k"-frame and S&W built "k"-frame .357s (the models 13, 19, 65, 66). Note the word "built" not "builds" -- S&W decided the "k"-frame wasn't quite strong enough for daily .357 use. The problem wasn't blowups but shaking apart too quickly.
"Theoretically" you could change the caliber to .357 by changing the barrel and cylinder (which is a somewhat involved process -- not something you are doing without a few specialized tools and some know-how). The real question is whether you want to rely on a frame that was only put together with 38 components. Given that the model 64 is of relatively recent vintage my hunch is that the gun would work and be serviceable. But there is a chance there. Now if you were to use a "k"-frame that was older you would really be taking some chances. As a number of people have said, you would be better off just buying another gun. Just the cylinder and the barrel are going to set you back over $200 (for new S&W parts) and if you want to do the work yourself you will need around $500 in tools (at least).
"Theoretically" you could change the caliber to .357 by changing the barrel and cylinder (which is a somewhat involved process -- not something you are doing without a few specialized tools and some know-how). The real question is whether you want to rely on a frame that was only put together with 38 components. Given that the model 64 is of relatively recent vintage my hunch is that the gun would work and be serviceable. But there is a chance there. Now if you were to use a "k"-frame that was older you would really be taking some chances. As a number of people have said, you would be better off just buying another gun. Just the cylinder and the barrel are going to set you back over $200 (for new S&W parts) and if you want to do the work yourself you will need around $500 in tools (at least).