frontsight40
Member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2008
- Messages
- 6
- Reaction score
- 0
Why does Smith and Wesson print that statement of operation on their 1911 pistols? Nobody else ruins Mr. Browning's weapon by printing that on the side.
Originally posted by XTrooper:
Everything is "idiot-proofed" to the max today. Not only is this annoying, but it derails nature's "survival of the fittest" safety valve. All this cuddling is why we're now surrounded by morons. A few decades ago, half of these nitwits would have killed themselves by now. Instead, now we end up with election results like those from a week ago.![]()
Originally posted by john traveler:
You ever hear the story about why Ruger went to the New Model Single Action design and had to roll-mark warnings on the side of the barrel?
Back in the early 1970's an Alaskan guide put a fully-loaded Ruger .44 Magnum single action on the dashboard of his jeep. The gun tumbled off during off-road travel, discharged, and struck him in the kneecap, causing loss of the leg. The guy sued Ruger, and won a $20 MILLION judgement, and part of the settlement required Ruger to mark their guns with warning statements. Lawyers. Imagine that!