Worthless Chicken Poop? Or, Ain't Science Amazing?

Bullseye 2620

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2008
Messages
3,443
Reaction score
6,576
Location
Tierra del encantamiento
We have all heard the expression, "as worthless as chicken ____."

Well folks, it turns out that chicken manure may not be so worthless after all.

My friend and former colleague at Virginia Tech, Professor Foster Agblevor, has developed a process that turns chicken manure into diesel fuel, either Number 4 (bunker oil) or Number 2 (equivalent to motor fuel or home heating oil).

Originally funded by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation to demonstrate a way to prevent the leaching of excess phosphorus and nitrogen into the rivers and ultimately into the Chesapeake Bay, this system uses catalytic pyrolysis, where the chicken litter (manure plus bedding, usually wood chips) is heated to 450º C. in the absence of oxygen to form three components -- carbon ash, pyrolysis oil, and synthesis gas, or "syngas," which is carbon monoxide plus hydrogen. The carbon ash is useful as a soil amendment. The pyrolysis oil is the equivalent of No. 4 (bunker oil), and the syngas can be further transformed into what Foster calls "green diesel," which is not the same as biodiesel but can be used in similar applications (e.g., motor vehicle or heavy equipment fuel).

This is important for the large chicken industry here in the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia, and in other major chicken producing states like North Carolina, Arkansas, and Oklahoma, because of the water pollution problems that result when chicken litter is spread on fields. Chicken producers also confront the very expensive need to keep their chicken houses heated, which usually involves the use of large amounts of expensive propane. Now, Foster's process gives them a way to dispose of the large amounts of waste that their operations produce, and at the same time gives them an alternative fuel, at very little cost, with which to heat their chicken houses.

This project is at the demonstration stage, and a portable unit is now in operation in Dayton, Virginia, at the northern end of the Shenandoah Valley. Right now, the focus is on testing the system and making sure that it, and the No. 4 it produces, is economically useful to the chicken producers. The next step will be to attach a separate module to the system to transform the syngas into No. 2, for use in trucks, tractors, cars, and other heavy equipment that normally uses conventional petroleum diesel.

While the development of cellulosic ethanol (not made from corn kernels, but from corn stalks and other non-grain biomass) is proceeding slowly because of technical problems in breaking down the cellulose that composes plant fibers into fermentable sugars from which ethanol may be distilled, Foster's process has no such issues, and promises to come to market fairly soon.

He tells me that at commercial scale, this could drastically lower the cost of diesel fuel and home heating oil, to perhaps as low as $1.50 a gallon. And by the way, his studies show that his "chicken diesel" is more energy dense (more BTUs per gallon) than the currently available biodiesel made from soybean oil or waste grease from kitchen operations. It also reduces air pollution by 88% compared to what happens when you burn petroleum diesel and is 100% carbon neutral.

I have attached some photos of the pilot system, which is trailer mounted and thus portable, allowing it to be transported from farm to farm -- much easier than moving around tons and tons of chicken litter. The second to last photo shows the No. 4 as it comes out of the reactor, ready to use to heat the chicken houses. The last illustration which shows how the process works in schematic form.

What can I say? Virginia Tech -- Invent the Future!


Bullseye


P.S.: I want to thank Bruce Lee M for raising the question about the composition of this stuff with respect to the nitrates it contains (see below). If you don't burn the bio-oil, it can be further refined to make explosives, including gunpowder.
 

Attachments

  • DSC00944.jpg
    DSC00944.jpg
    80.3 KB · Views: 137
  • DSC00949.jpg
    DSC00949.jpg
    74 KB · Views: 122
  • DSC00946.jpg
    DSC00946.jpg
    71.9 KB · Views: 132
  • DSC00951.jpg
    DSC00951.jpg
    70.6 KB · Views: 139
  • biooil.jpg
    biooil.jpg
    16.1 KB · Views: 141
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
efficiency

It is always great to hear that CS or any other waste can be converted to fuel and reduce run off pollution.
The only problem is, it takes energy to produce the fuel.
To heat the biomass to 450 C. requires a lot of fuel.
I would like to know what is the net gain in energy after subtracting the energy used to process the biomass.
Anybody have some useful data?

Bruce
 
I don't know about useful data, but hook that baby up to the exhaust line on a power plant. Waste heat I believe they call it. Of course you would have to move your poo..........
 
I remember reading about making ethanol from corn. When all was said and done it took as much energy to produce as was created.
Government subsidies to produce ethanol and a requirement to add it to motor fuel drove the market.
The unintended consequences of this government program was the price of corn went up.

Since CS is not a food source this won't be an issue.

Even if the costs of production are equal to the fuel gained, processing the CS to remove it as a waste product makes it worth the effort.

Bruce
 
We have all heard the expression, "as worthless as chicken ____."

Well folks, it turns out that chicken manure may not be so worthless after all.

Anyone who has been to an Arkansas chicken farm knows that one of the primary reasons to grow chickens is for the chicken manure that fertilizes the pasture. That's half the reason to grow them in the first place.
 
CAN HE DO IT WITH BS ? ! ? ! ? :eek:

Yee-haw!
If so, I got it made!
Have him contact me about siphoning this board, an' we'll both be rich in a month!

(Sip, Caj- GET BUSY)
:D
:cool:
 
Net Energy Gain From Chicken Poop

Lee, he is a professor at a major research university. . .I think he's got more than enough BS already :D . . . but I'll ask!

Bruce Lee M, the energy savings is in the amount of pyrolysis oil you can produce per ton of poultry litter. The syngas generated by this system is used as the heat source for the system. The system is thus energy self-sufficient. The energy content of the oil is usually about 28 MJ/kg compared to 46.2 MJ/kg for petroleum diesel or 46.4 MJ/kg for gasoline. Depending on the quality of the litter you start with, the system will produce from 300 kg to 400 kg of oil per ton of litter pyrolyzed. If you take the lower figure of 300 kg of oil produced per ton of litter, the net energy gain is on the order of 8,400 MJ per ton of litter. 8,400 MJ is equal to about 2,333 kilowatts. The average US house (1600-2000 square feet and having electric appliances except for the furnace) uses about 50 KwH per day, or about 18,000 KwH per year. So, the net energy gain per ton of chicken litter processed is enough, using round numbers, to power the average US house for about a month and a half. Of course, if it's Al Gore's house you're talking about, that translates into only about 15 days. :D

Bullseye
 
Last edited:
methane

Thanks for the information. I had not considered the syngas being the heat source. Sounds like another great idea.
Now why don't they just use all those nitrates to make gunpowder instead.
It's been done before and cheeper/pun intended, powder would make me happy.

Bruce
 
Gunpowder from Chicken Poop? You Betcha!

Thanks for the information. I had not considered the syngas being the heat source. Sounds like another great idea. Now why don't they just use all those nitrates to make gunpowder instead. It's been done before and cheeper/pun intended, powder would make me happy.

Bruce

Actually Bruce, if you don't burn the the bio-oil (pyrolysis oil) as a replacement for No. 4 (bunker oil) it can be further processed to make a whole host of value-added products including adhesives, insecticides, plastics, and yes, explosives, including gunpowder. I really hadn't thought of gunpowder as one of the products, but one could certainly do that. And my back of the envelope calculations suggest that like fuel, making gunpowder this way would substantially lower its cost.


Bullseye
 
Back
Top