9mm Defense Ammo.

The FBI protocols almost always favor the 147 HP. These are Speer Gold dots but other brands are similar. Before I retired we used the 147 HP on the job based on the testing.
54565413822_603e1a7c6e_c.jpg
 
Last edited:
As y'all know, ammo is what makes an autoloader function. Stuff that's fine from a solid two-handed grip might be marginal shot one-handed from an awkward position. I think that standard velocity HST (or other ammo) would perform well on target, but I like having that extra oomph in case I need to use it from a compromised position.
Well said. This was exactly the point I was trying to make in another ammo-related thread today, but you articulated it much better than I did.
 
Federal 9bp for my older Standard Hi-power, Winchester +p 124 Ranger-T for my later Mark III with 18.5 lb recoil spring.
 
I have carried several loads over the last 40 years. From handloads to Speer Gold Dots. All performed well and, as one member here used to say:
"Shot placement is King, adequate penetration is Queen and everything else is Angels dancing on the heads of pins.”
P.s. I seldom carry my handloads anymore. Once apron a time, cops carried them every day on duty. We had a local Police Inspector that carried his engraved M629 with 180gr 44Mag handloads. When he qualified with his revolver, (early 2010’s) he had a bucket with ice in it to plunge it into between courses of fire.
He was a one of a kind, no two ways about that. His name was Dennis Riechard.

Im a dealer and have seen Fort Scott Munitions come right up. They are actually taking up the LEO ammo demand very nicely.
Before I took them on I put the ammo through the mill. I also am a dealer for Spartan Armour Systems. I took a couple of 500+ plates to see as I have done in the past.
We through everything at the plates and as expected many dings but not a single hole at 100 yds. We were shooting 357's, 44's 308's, everything.
I took out my 300blk and put FT Scott TUI ammo in and right through the plate, at 100yds. I took one of the other plates that we had been dinging up and put it 18" behind the 1st plate and took another shot. Right through both plates as if they had nothing in front of them.
Now I Love my Spartan Armour Systems products and have sold many Systems to my clients, I wouldn't sell anything else.
If your looking for excellent defense or hunting ammo check them out. You can also contact HomeTown Defense in Leavenworth Kansas and he can help you with questions and a purchase.
Definitely an ammo to consider when one shot could be the only one you get!
 
With all that info, I have another question: Can ballistic/bullet performance testing be done accurately with water jugs?
Not sure how all those images go together without further review….but, you can get my drift.
I am not the originator of this type of testing, I’m not claiming anything like that. The originator stated that there was tons of testing that went into it. I’d like to ask about your comparative data from your tests. Gold Dot, HST….so on. Do the numbers seem similar?
Thanks…

View attachment 764043
Brother, I have to tell you, testing with water jugs is kind of out of my wheel house. I've never done it. I always shoot 10% , real ballistics gel and it is certified before each shoot by temperature and density. We use a good old BB gun for certification and it is done on every block of gel before we shoot real bullets at it. I can tell you that the 124 grain GD and HST reliably get 14.2 -14.5 of penetration on bare gel out of a 4" pistol. The HST gets a little bigger than the GD due to it's construction. Shorter barrel guns get about the same pentation but don't get as big due to the slightly lower velocity. The advantage to G2 is that it doesn't rely on hydraulics to initiate expansion so the HP doesn't get plugged. It relies on impact and it is very consistent through the various medias in the protocol.
 
Those in the know, meaning those that have access to and study would ballistics recommend a bonded 124 grain +P.

Federal HST
Speer Gold Dot
Although +P is not a requirement these days. HST and GD/GD2 work very well at standard velocities and pressures. In fact only the 124 grain is available in +P and generally only nets about an extra 10fps. The 147's in both are not available in +P and the only reason the 124's are still available in +P is because there are still a few uninformed agencies that still spec it.
 
For the extra 50 fps I'll stick with "standard" 124 gr HST @1150. That's 200 fps faster than .38 spl 158 gr HPSWC +P which everyone is convinced is Thor's hammer. And there are 15 of them without reloading. Go with what lets you sleep and dream of never needing your gun for it's intended purpose. Joe
 
For the extra 50 fps I'll stick with "standard" 124 gr HST @1150. That's 200 fps faster than .38 spl 158 gr HPSWC +P which everyone is convinced is Thor's hammer. And there are 15 of them without reloading. Go with what lets you sleep and dream of never needing your gun for it's intended purpose. Joe
Well, these 38spl, 160gr FWC @ 1200fps (3” barrel) are kinda like Thor’s Hammer…..just sayin’! LolIMG_2350.jpeg
 
For the extra 50 fps I'll stick with "standard" 124 gr HST @1150. That's 200 fps faster than .38 spl 158 gr HPSWC +P which everyone is convinced is Thor's hammer. And there are 15 of them without reloading. Go with what lets you sleep and dream of never needing your gun for it's intended purpose. Joe
What most folks don't realize is that velocity is not as critical in regards to penetration as is bullet weight and construction. The 124 grain HST is a great round and that is a good choice, but that 158 grain HPSWC is not too bad. I have shot 148 grain factory HBWC into real 10% gel at 700 FPS and still get 14-15 inches of penetration.
 
Brother, I have to tell you, testing with water jugs is kind of out of my wheel house.
I choose to use water jugs because of the availability of plastic jugs filled with water over buying 10% ballistic gel. Lol
Here is some data I got with my water jug testing and my BUL Axe Cleaver full size (4 1/2” barrel approx.) and Gold Dot 124gr LE +P ammo. From the website Saleen provided, for the same load, our results are pretty much the same. I find that very interesting.
IMG_3156.jpegIMG_3155.jpeg
 
The agency I retired from was exclusively Winchester since the early 90's...during that period we had several OIS all of which resulted in the demise of the offender. Since retirement, I've found that Winchester LE ammo has been much more difficult to obtain on the civilian market than Federal and others. But, when available to me, the bonded 124 or 147 is my preference...followed by HST.
There are numerous new offerings in multiple calibers which may prove effective, but the top 3, Winchester, Federal & Speer are the brands with the most consistent "street proven" results.
Ranger 9mm, 147 grain, 40 S&W 180 grain. 45 ACP 185 abs 230 grain JHP for the win! :)
 
I choose to use water jugs because of the availability of plastic jugs filled with water over buying 10% ballistic gel. Lol
Here is some data I got with my water jug testing and my BUL Axe Cleaver full size (4 1/2” barrel approx.) and Gold Dot 124gr LE +P ammo. From the website Saleen provided, for the same load, our results are pretty much the same. I find that very interesting.
View attachment 764574View attachment 764575
Brother I get that. I hate mixing gel. I've carried so much of it in my trucks over the years, I'm pretty sure a cadaver dog would hit on it. We see an average of about 14.5" out of that bullet in gel but it looks like it gets a little bigger in water than it does in gel. I'd have to look at a recent shoot report but I think the biggest I saw that bullet was around .705-.710. Weight retention is always good with that bullet, which is a bonded construction.
 
Not all guns are built equal, not all ammunition is built equal. Some guns like this brand but don’t like that brand but other guns do. Need to buy a box and go to the range, see if it works in your gun.
This statement is more important than any test seen live or on Youtube. I have two guns in the same caliber from the same company. They are a Ruger LCP and a Ruger LCP Max. The LCP Max will cycle Sig V-Crowns all day long, it has zero problem with them. The LCP however, doesn't like them and has failures to feed regularly. I'm looking at seeing how both cycle Federal HST rounds to consolidate my ammo, but knowing what ammo your gun can cycle is important. The Sig V-Crown in .380 is a really good round. I am not knocking it. My Wife's Shield EZ and my LCP Max cycle it without issue and it gives really good results. It's just not a good match for my standard LCP for some reason. Find wht ammo works in your gun, because that is waht really matters. If your gun won't cycle the internet's favorite round, then it's useless.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top