Walther P 38’s are very cool and I would love to have one. It’s a shame there are no semi auto guns today that have that style and class. They all pretty much look the same.
I'm the firearms historian for a state museum. I don't understand why museums get a bad rap. People are making incorrect assumptions based on ignorance of the museum policies. Our institution has a policy preventing the sale or deaccessioning of artifacts. Paperwork associated with donations can specify return to donor or prohibit disposal of the item. Of course it depends on the museum and their policies. Investigate those before making a donation.
I have given my father's firearms and other artifacts to different museums.
The other option is your beloved guns will be pawned by your grandchildren to get money for the latest version of a cell phone.
Great History and P38 rig.
The condition is spectacular. The Spreewerk machining/finishing of '42 on that one doesn't look any different than that of an AC44 I have.
My Dad brought home a nice one. A 'Zero Series' Walther Banner pistol w/belt, holster. He was a Sherman driver in the 20th Armored.
One day he took it and pounded it into pieces in the garage
with a sledgehammer.
Maybe he didn't care for the wooden case I made for it.
Great History and P38 rig.
The condition is spectacular. The Spreewerk machining/finishing of '42 on that one doesn't look any different than that of an AC44 I have.
My Dad brought home a nice one. A 'Zero Series' Walther Banner pistol w/belt, holster. He was a Sherman driver in the 20th Armored.
One day he took it and pounded it into pieces in the garage
with a sledgehammer.
Maybe he didn't care for the wooden case I made for it.
My attitude about this gun shifted slightly following my first refusal to take it. First, as a college history major and retired military officer, I do not "own" this artifact. I'm its current custodian. The history it represents should be respected. That is now my responsibility. Second, throughout history when one's foe has been vanquished his weapons are a prize of war that symbolizes that any threat he may have posed has been defanged. The weapon itself has no soul, and is only a reflection of its user. The enemy who owned this weapon was quite throughly eliminated as a threat to anyone. This artifact testifies to that.[
/QUOTE]
Thank you for this essay. I acquired a Mosin-Nagant rifle and Nagant revolver, both with Finnish capture marks, plus a post-war Finnish Lahti pistol because of my admiration for the Finnish people. Nobody has ever questioned my ownership of these, but now I can explain why I have these pieces if the question ever comes up.
There are no marks of any kind on either magazine.
A second magazine came with the rig, as I understand was standard issue. The pistol is indeed marked "cyq" which is how I was able to trace it back to the Spreewerke plant in Czechoslovakia and determine its date of manufacture. Marks can be seen in the first set of photos. (e/88, Reichsadler, cyq Waffenampt code, etc.
Of the three plants that produced these, Spreewerke produced the fewest. Something like 280,000 of the over one million made during the war. It's also the only plant outside of Germany to produce a complete German weapon system. They also made 88mm flak guns.
I wondered what rifles are in the rather bacchanal photo on the back of the tank, so I expanded it.
I see Igor is armed with an M1 Rifle and has a clip of ammo for it half in / half out of the right chest pocket of his jacket. Interesting way to have a fast reload at the ready. He also has another wine bottle in his jacket at the ready! Note that one of his buddies is holding an M1 Carbine.
![]()