Discuss the Bodyguard 2.0 thumb safety

G

geeollie

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 25, 2017
Messages
541
Reaction score
491
Location
on the great plains
I have been reading on this forum about the S&W Bodyguard 2.0.
Several comments along the lines of "better get the safety" have caught my attention.

I was an early Glock user and my department offered the New York Trigger. I liked the NY 1 trigger since I was coming from revolvers. Many years later, I don't like a thumb safety and actually try to stay clear of them. These include Glock, S&W M&P, Original .380 Bodyguard, Springfield XDs.

For the Bodyguard 2.0 and no other handgun in this earth, educate me. If you believe the Bodyguard 2.0 needs the safety, why is that? I'd be pleased to hear your experience and opinion. Especially if that opinion is based on experience.
 
I don’t like thumb safeties on striker fired pistols. As long as the trigger guard is covered by the holster and you use care re-holstering I see no need for a thumb safety. Many times when re-holstering my IWB holsters I remove the holster before reinserting the pistol. As I age and have less flexibility I find I have no issues drawing but it is easier to remove the holster insert pistol then place holstered weapon inside my waste band at 3-4 O Clock.


I tend to have less issues re-holstering larger pistols but being an old retired guy is a lot different than working the streets and taking offenders into custody.
 
OK, based on that, the comments I have read make sense.
I was not aware of a light trigger pull. I can see how that might make a difference.

Thank you for posting.
 
Thinking about the 2.0 having a lighter trigger pull.
It makes sense but then how many gun websites are all about making the trigger pull of every gun lighter. But maybe not for pocket carry. One company has a lot of trade in making the Bodyguard .380 trigger shorter and lighter. So I really need to just buy a 2.0 and see for myself!

Do any of you know the trigger pull of a Glock 42 compared to the 2.0?
 
Last edited:
I own the original BG380 (Non-Safety & Non-Laser) and only carried it out of convenience. The trigger on that thing isn't going to be pulled without intention, as you know.

Just picked up the BG 2.0 and the trigger is pretty light compared to other pocket pistols. It's definitely lighter than the G42 I own, but not terribly so. It's almost like the flat face makes it feel lighter if that makes sense. I plan on getting a nice kydex pocket holster to cover the trigger and also the mag release button. I'd never try and re-holster a pocket pistol while the holster is in pocket so I'm not too worried that.

God forbid, if the time ever comes when I need to draw it, a safety is not something I want to even think about dealing with. I understand folks say it's all about the training, but I've seen enough footage online to know that I do not want to be fiddling with a safety in the heat of the moment.

Obviously, it's all about your comfort level, but I won't carry a pistol with a safety.
 
Last edited:
This is helpful information. Thank you for posting.
I agree about a good pocket holster. I will be checking on the kydex holsters. My Bodyguard .380 has a good selection available Maybe the Bodyguard 2.0 will be popular enough to get a good selection.
 
I preferred the heavier trigger on the original LCP for pocket carry over the shorter lighter trigger on the newer model. I don’t like thumb safeties, but have wondered about the Bodyguard 2.0 trigger for pocket carry.
 
diyj98 said:
I preferred the heavier trigger on the original LCP for pocket carry over the shorter lighter trigger on the newer model.
Click to expand...

Agreed. The trigger on original LCP (second gen) was great. I didn't mind the trigger on the LCP II or Max, but what worried me was that hammer being 90% cocked while in my pocket and without a plunger safety for that firing pin. I just didn't trust that design.

The new BG 2.0 has the firing pin safety and I fully trust it. As long as I don't press that trigger, it won't fire. Just have to keep that trigger protected while in pocket as number one priority.
 
jsimpson4 said:
Agreed. The trigger on original LCP (second gen) was great. I didn't mind the trigger on the LCP II or Max, but what worried me was that hammer being 90% cocked while in my pocket and without a plunger safety for that firing pin. I just didn't trust that design.

The new BG 2.0 has the firing pin safety and I fully trust it. As long as I don't press that trigger, it won't fire. Just have to keep that trigger protected while in pocket as number one priority.
Click to expand...

Another advantage of a thumb safety is that in the event that someone else gets control of the gun, they will not be able to fire it immediately, if at all.
The general public knows nothing of thumb safeties.
 
smoothshooter said:
Another advantage of a thumb safety is that in the event that someone else gets control of the gun, they will not be able to fire it immediately, if at all.
The general public knows nothing of thumb safeties.
Click to expand...

I mean no disrespect, but planning on losing your handgun is in the same class as keeping the chamber empty in case a BG gets it away from you.
If I lose my handgun to an attacker, then I've already lost that fight (and probably my life).
I agree w/the previous poster in that I do not want to be fiddling w/a small safety under stress when fine motor control goes out the window.
 
smoothshooter said:
Another advantage of a thumb safety is that in the event that someone else gets control of the gun, they will not be able to fire it immediately, if at all.
The general public knows nothing of thumb safeties.
Click to expand...


I would suggest getting on a mat with a blue gun and learning how to protect your gun, instead of planning to lose it.
 
I posted a comment on the Bodyguard 380 safety on 6/29.
This post would also apply to the new 2.0.
Go to Bodyguard safety in search to read it. I believe you will find it enlightening whether you agree or not.
Enjoy your new Bodyguard 2.0!
I am an old guy and don’t know how to copy my post to this one.
 
Rob613 said:
I would suggest getting on a mat with a blue gun and learning how to protect your gun, instead of planning to lose it.
Click to expand...

I would suggest getting to the range and learning how to draw and shoot instead of planning on grappling with an attacker.


Hopefully the above silliness highlights the silliness of your post.
 
jsimpson4 said:
Agreed. The trigger on original LCP (second gen) was great. I didn't mind the trigger on the LCP II or Max, but what worried me was that hammer being 90% cocked while in my pocket and without a plunger safety for that firing pin. I just didn't trust that design.

The new BG 2.0 has the firing pin safety and I fully trust it. As long as I don't press that trigger, it won't fire. Just have to keep that trigger protected while in pocket as number one priority.
Click to expand...

The firing pin safety is not the issue; it’s about a fold of clothing or a careless finger depressing a light trigger when re-holstering, especially when using an IWB or pocket holster.
 
smoothshooter said:
The firing pin safety is not the issue; it’s about a fold of clothing or a careless finger depressing a light trigger when re-holstering, especially when using an IWB or pocket holster.
Click to expand...

I can't imagine anyone in their right mind trying to re-holster in a pocket holster without removing it first, but let's face it, a few gun owners are not all there.
 
I picked up my new Bodyguard 2.0 yesterday. Getting aquatinted, I found the manual safety dang near impossible to operate. I had to push with both thumbs to go from safe to free and back. Now I haven't dissembled, cleaned and lubed everything yet and I am use to my 365 with a long safety lever, but does this thing smooth out with use?
Secondly, about the trigger operation. It seems the trigger pull has some mechanical notches in a pull. Is this a bug or feature for those that like to have a pre travel stop as the trigger approaches the break?
Comments appreciated.
 
smoothshooter said:
From the reports I have seen, the 2.0 has an unusually light trigger pull; much lighter than most carry guns that may be used for pocket carry.
Too light, in my opinion without an external safety.
Click to expand...

If you’re carrying condition one, probably so for inexperienced folks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Bodyguard 2.0 Safety
Replies
2
Views
451
VictorLouis
VictorLouis
M
Bodyguard 2.0 trigger blade safety catching issue?
Replies
8
Views
586
GnarlsR2
G
S
Bodyguard 2.0 Safety Failure
Replies
19
Views
852
Mr500cm
M
T
New Bodyguard 2.0 Trigger Safety
Replies
2
Views
572
thewakes42
T
R
safety mod for shield plus and bodyguard 2.0
Replies
1
Views
689
CommunismDelendaEst
C

Latest posts

Back
Top