|
 |

08-20-2010, 10:52 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: METAIRIE,LA.
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Liked 29 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
PMC .38 Spl. Tubular Ammo
A couple of years ago my brother and I bought a lot of new old stock from a defunct gunshop. Among the goodies was an assortment of discontinued ammo of various calibers. I recently was going through what we had left and found two boxes of Ultramax .38spl ammo. Manufactured by PMC, and marked 38 J Special +P 66gr. Tubular. I remember these from back in the 80's or 90's. They weren't on the market long and I think they were banned since they were supposedly solid bronze tubing with a teflon plug base which fell away after being fired. They had sharp edges and got the nickname "cookie cutters". I think they are fairly rare these days. At first I was going to try a few at the range with thoughts of using them in a carry gun but the fact that they were banned and may be considered illegal, not to mention being pretty old changed my mind. Has anyone ever had any experience firing these rounds? Would they be of any value to cartridge collectors? Just wondering.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

08-20-2010, 11:38 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 897
Likes: 55
Liked 527 Times in 144 Posts
|
|
I believe the UltraMax original .38 Special loadings with brass bullets is on the Fed banned ammo list. The copper plated and aluminum alloy bullets are OK by the Feds.
|

08-20-2010, 11:49 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 7,618
Likes: 8,362
Liked 6,023 Times in 2,755 Posts
|
|
I have heard rumors that some of the earlier ones may have been legislated against as "armor-piercing," but that later production differed and had been found by the ATF to be OK. Again, rumor-level reliability; I used to remember the details, but even then I did not have reliable documentation.
I can tell you for a fact that the later production is definitely not armor-piercing, armor being Kevlar in moderate amounts.
These rounds are very accurate in my 2.5" M19 and M66. They are rated +P. They shoot low, as would be expected of a very light bullet - I think about 2.5 revolutions (900 degrees) on the rear sight screw of a 2.5" K-frame. They don't drop much at distance.
AFAIK, PMC stopped producing them because the patent owner, Abe Flatau, came after them, and between the cost of not stealing and the modest sales, it wasn't worth it. They also made some in .44, which I wouldn't mind encountering.
I chrono'ed some out of my 2.5" Diamondback at 1446 fps; my 2.5" 19 gave 1387 fps, both with a standard deviation of velocity of 18 fps.
Last edited by ImprovedModel56Fan; 08-20-2010 at 01:08 PM.
Reason: typo
|

08-20-2010, 04:51 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 292
Liked 643 Times in 345 Posts
|
|
I shot a box of .44 Specials about 20 years ago. As I recall, they were very inaccurate and shot about 3 feet low at 21 feet. At 25 yds., forget about it.
|

08-20-2010, 05:37 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 620
Likes: 79
Liked 282 Times in 164 Posts
|
|
The original PMC Ultramag load in 38Spl did use a brass alloy bullet that was declaired armor piercing by BATF. The 2nd Grn loading in 38Spl and 44Spl used a copper bullet to get around the AP designation.
This Tubular ammo is highly collectable and you can probably get $50-60 for a box or $2 per round if you can find the right people to buy the ammo a single round at a time.
|

08-21-2010, 07:13 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Tacoma - Washington
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Hello-
I might be interested...PM sent, Thanks
Mike
|

08-21-2010, 08:25 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 184
Likes: 4
Liked 33 Times in 16 Posts
|
|
I'm a newby to revolvers and the forum but I would be very interested to see a picture of this ammo.
|

08-22-2010, 12:55 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: East of Dallas... TX
Posts: 951
Likes: 33
Liked 161 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
__________________
I miss my 4546 the most.
|

03-19-2014, 08:06 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
PMC Tubular 38spl +p ammo
This ammo has been my every day carry in my J frame for years. I'm down to my last 5 rounds of it. I knew it was pretty old but I guess I didn't remember just how old it is. I was looking around online to try to buy more when I found this thread.
Perhaps it's time to put newer ammo in my snubby. LOL
PMC Tubular Ammo.jpg
|

03-19-2014, 05:14 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Badgerland
Posts: 2,385
Likes: 567
Liked 1,530 Times in 796 Posts
|
|
I got a couple of boxes of the 44 cookie cutter ammo when it first came out.
I guess it never occurred to me it might be illegal.
Kind of a moot point however as I discovered it would not shoot well or anywhere near regular ammo.
The fact the bullets weigh half what a normal slug would and are more than likely much smaller
in diameter than the revolvers of the era's throats caused me to just give up on them.
They might actually shoot well thru a newer gun but I still don't want
to have to fool with the radical sight adjustment.
If I wanted to shoot a solid copper bullet, I would probably go with something like this:
HGS_44_240
or one of the Barnes numbers.
===
Nemo
Last edited by Nemo288; 08-23-2020 at 06:09 PM.
Reason: update Cutting Edge URL
|

03-19-2014, 08:30 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 620
Likes: 79
Liked 282 Times in 164 Posts
|
|
Nemo288, no need to worry about your 44Spl THP ammo as it uses the copper alloy bullet and isn't considered AP.
|

03-19-2014, 10:31 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 661
Likes: 292
Liked 365 Times in 191 Posts
|
|
That stuff was interesting.
There was the potential of overpenetration in ordinary use.
It would cut a section in 3/4" plywood and leave a plug of wood in the bullethole whilst screaming downrange uninterrupted.
It was surmised that a through & through with it would create long shreds of guts hanging out the backside wound tract.
It was high veloicity and nasty. More than likely a very effective anti-personnell round
I thought they were cool as the dickens.
|

08-23-2020, 05:40 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 663
Likes: 300
Liked 630 Times in 272 Posts
|
|
Necropost, but found 5 rds of the 38 in a baggie of HP's my step brothers gave me. Guess I'll hang on to them. Good thing I didnt decide to test them in my j frame.
Last edited by 1775usmarine; 08-23-2020 at 07:22 PM.
|

08-25-2020, 11:18 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 35,560
Likes: 331
Liked 32,140 Times in 15,294 Posts
|
|
I don't believe they are illegal, at least under Federal regulations. The ban is on sales of such ammo, NOT possession or use. I don't know about State-level laws concerning possession, but there may be some.
|

09-09-2020, 02:29 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Roanoke, Va.
Posts: 230
Likes: 12
Liked 434 Times in 150 Posts
|
|
I was working off duty in a gun shop back in the mid '80's-'90's. We had a load of this ammo come in and I picked up three boxes of it along with some P.M.C. Starfire to carry in my off duty model 36. I went to the range the following week for our semi annual gualifications and was excited to show off the newest, baddest round. I was very disappointed as we couldn't hit anything with those rounds. They grouped well, but very low even at the seven yard line and hardly any recoil. Conversely, the Starfire ammo shot great and I continued to carry it or Nyclads off duty for the next several years.
I was poking around in the ammo cabinet downstairs a week or so ago and ran across a box and a half of the stuff still there. A pretty interesting round.
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|