Ammo Ballistics/Chronograph Stats?

Reggie TisFree

Reggie TisFree

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2021
Messages
87
Reaction score
39
Location
Alabama
We all have certain ammo/firearm pet peeves.
Here is one of mine: Ammo for sale with no point of reference concerning its ballistic or chronograph results!! :mad:
I wanted to ask you guys for any potential info concerning these two particular ammo offerings:

1.) SAA -9mm 124 Grain GDHP Nickel-Brass Cased - SAA Personal Protection JHP. It uses a Speer GD bullet. Here is all the customer service rep said, "It's loaded to standard SAAMI spec pressure, not +P or hotter. I do not have chrono data from production otherwise!"

SAA Personal Protection 9mm 124 gr. GDHP Nickel Plated Brass Cased Ammunition For Sale In Stock | Surplus Ammo

2. 9mm Luger +P 124 Grain Di-Cut Jacketed Hollow Point Black Dot Ammo By IMI of Israel
50 Round Box - 9mm Luger +P 124 Grain Di-Cut Jacketed Hollow Point Black Dot Ammo By IMI of Israel | SGAmmo.com
 

Attachments

  • SAA-9mm-124-GDHP-VP-SITE-s-o__87741.1605034941.jpg
    SAA-9mm-124-GDHP-VP-SITE-s-o__87741.1605034941.jpg
    86.4 KB · Views: 31
  • TriCUT 124.jpg
    TriCUT 124.jpg
    123.8 KB · Views: 46
Register to hide this ad
This is of little importance with regard to handgun ammo. You can do some research and find what similar loads by other makers do over a chronograph. The ammo you mentioned will likely be relatively close in velocity to the other loads. Depending on all the changeable factors involved, a 10% variation in actual velocity one way or the other is reasonable and to be expected.

This takes on importance with high velocity rifle cartridges intended for long range use.
 
rockquarry said:
This is of little importance with regard to handgun ammo. You can do some research and find what similar loads by other makers do over a chronograph. The ammo you mentioned will likely be relatively close in velocity to the other loads. Depending on all the changeable factors involved, a 10% variation in actual velocity one way or the other is reasonable and to be expected.

This takes on importance with high velocity rifle cartridges intended for long range use.
Click to expand...

I understand your perspective. That chit doesn't fly with me! As a paying customer, I like to know the details of what I'm purchasing and it is important to me. I hold all my ammo and my life to the highest standard whether I'm blasting high-end rifles or more clandestine EDC!
 
Last edited:
Reggie TisFree said:
I understand your perspective. That chit doesn't fly with me! As a paying customer, I like to know the details of what I'm purchasing and it is important to me. I hold all my ammo and my life to the highest standard whether I'm blasting high-end rifles or more clandestine EDC!
Click to expand...

Please pardon me; I apologize for commenting. Just an opinion based on experience.
 
I chased that fox until I did a lot of chrono work for matches, and was forced to the realization that I could either chrono the load of interest in MY GUN, or I could keep guessing and being frustrated. I bought my own PACT chronograph and KNOW what I'm getting with each load, either commercial or handload.
Even detailed factory information, such as data was taken with a 7 inch vented test barrel, often proves to be wildly different than actual chrono test in MY 5" M&P Pro. Loss of velocity with a shorter barrel depends on the powder used and the individual barrel. I have 2 "identical" 4" Model 66 S&Ws that consistently chrono 30 fps different.
 
Last edited:
OKFC05 said:
I chased that fox until I did a lot of chrono work for matches, and was forced to the realization that I could either chrono the load of interest in MY GUN, or I could keep guessing and being frustrated. I bought my own PACT chronograph and KNOW what I'm getting with each load, either commercial or handload.
Even detailed factory information, such as data was taken with a 7 inch vented test barrel, often proves to be wildly different than actual chrono test in MY 5" M&P Pro. Loss of velocity with a shorter barrel depends on the powder used and the individual barrel. I have 2 "identical" 4" Model 66 S&Ws that consistently chrono 30 fps different.
Click to expand...

Excellent advice. I've been looking into that.
I see that there is a wide spectrum of chronos & prices out there.
Most look affordable & practical, any particular brand you'd recommend?
 
9mm EDC ammo

This sounds like good practice ammo.
If you’re going to carry and trust you’re life with the ammo in you’re EDC why not use the best possible ammo you can afford?
I trust my life with Underwood ammo, i train with Underwood ammo and have never had a failure in my 320 9mm or my Ed Brown 1911.
Ed Brown once told me alway use good ammo in you’re 1911,
Pay the little extra for it because it builds confidence in you’re EDC.
Using **** ammo which misfires, fails to feed or eject etc leads you to think its a problem with your weapon when its the **** ammo you’re using hence you then have a confidence problem with your EDC.
Just my opinion.
 
Last edited:
Terry,

I hear what you're saying for sure. I've not invested in or shot any Underwood, yet I've read many reviews and seen enough YouTube videos for it to resonate.

As far as my EDC is concerned this would not be used for that purpose...more as you had stated for practice or critter blasting up at my Fathers place.

My comfort zone and what I carry are the following: Speer GD 124+P, Federal HST 124, 124+P, 147, & 147+P.
Got a decent amount bonded Golden Sabers +P & Winchester Ranger 147 as well.

Appreciate your sharing...valid points.
 
Reggie TisFree said:
Excellent advice. I've been looking into that.
I see that there is a wide spectrum of chronos & prices out there.
Most look affordable & practical, any particular brand you'd recommend?
Click to expand...

How much money do you want to spend? The Labradar chrono is most convenient and consistent, the triple screens were the standard before the radar came along, and the most popular cheap ones are OK for casual use. The ones that put the whole chrono on the firing line will get shot, usually by someone who just wants to use it one time while you're using it at the range.

I bought a PACT since I tend to standardize loads and only re-chrono them when I change something. My "experimenting" phase of trying a new load each week was over years ago.

CED units are popular. I have no information on the current crop of Caldwell, but developed a negative impression from their models 10 years ago. Watch out for models that only work in certain weather.
No sky screens like to be pointed at cloudless deep blue sky without proper shielding. Learn how to set up your chrono.

Read the reviews and ask your local USPSA or IDPA clubs.
And if you have bucks to burn, a LABRADAR will solve all your problems.
 
Way back when I got into long range competition, I picked up a PACT unit. The electronics are separate from the screens, so if you pull a shot, you're only replacing a sky screen or 2. The screen mounting bracket takes care of making sure your screens are the proper distance apart. Great customer service.
 
Regarding revolvers, even with identical loads, two different revolvers, even with the same barrel lengths, will typically produce significantly different average MVs, by possibly as much as 200 ft/sec. I have determined this myself. This is due to differences in barrel-cylinder gaps and other dimensional differences. The ONLY way to know what the MV is from YOUR revolver for any specific load is to get a chrono. Published ammo manufacturer's (or handload handbook) MV data is absolutely worthless (even that taken from a vented test barrel) when it comes to revolvers. If it matters to you, get your own MV data for your own revolver. I can't tell you the edition, but one of the Speer handbooks has a lengthy section on exactly this topic and provides the same advice.
 
Last edited:
Update

***UPDATED INFO***
These are the specs found on 9mm Luger +P 124 Grain Di-Cut Jacketed Hollow Point Black Dot Ammo By IMI of Israel
 

Attachments

  • 2021-08-09 (2).jpg
    2021-08-09 (2).jpg
    26.4 KB · Views: 26
Just because there is data on a ammo box.............

does not mean it will be the same in your weapon.

It could be slower or maybe faster....................
if you need to know the fps of a load a chrony is needed but....
a SD load is usually good enough to work on the BG if you put enouh in them.
 
Nevada Ed,

Brother, you have a fine grasp for the obvious. lol
I am aware of all the mitigating factors affecting the performance results of ammo & firearms.
I was posting an update to display that I had @ least found SOME point of reference from my original post.
 
Reggie, for the most part, you'll get mostly useless information from the manufacturers about velocity data. If they record it, it'll usually be from a "test barrel" of some unknown length and probably unvented, which us useless when checking for ammo performance in revolvers.

Your friend in this case is YouTube. There is a ton of videos out there of people doing real-world chrono testing that will likely get you a lot closer to reality for your use.

Relative to the two ammo models you noted, I don't know SAA but the fact that they're using Gold Dot bullets is a good thing. At least you know that it will perform as long as it's driven faster than about 800 fps.

As to IMI, if I recall correctly, they generally use Sierra bullets. The IMI hollow points are pretty bad performers for expansion. So if the price is right for practice ammo, then you're probably fine. If you're going to carry it to defend your life, you may be using a pseudo-FMJ.
 
Borderboss said:
Reggie, for the most part, you'll get mostly useless information from the manufacturers about velocity data. If they record it, it'll usually be from a "test barrel" of some unknown length and probably unvented, which us useless when checking for ammo performance in revolvers.

Your friend in this case is YouTube. There is a ton of videos out there of people doing real-world chrono testing that will likely get you a lot closer to reality for your use.

Relative to the two ammo models you noted, I don't know SAA but the fact that they're using Gold Dot bullets is a good thing. At least you know that it will perform as long as it's driven faster than about 800 fps.

As to IMI, if I recall correctly, they generally use Sierra bullets. The IMI hollow points are pretty bad performers for expansion. So if the price is right for practice ammo, then you're probably fine. If you're going to carry it to defend your life, you may be using a pseudo-FMJ.
Click to expand...

I got it. That is the general consensus and what I have gathered via youTube.
The only revolvers I have are .38, .327 Federal...nothing 9 mm.
I do have several firearms in 9mm semi-automatic & carbine.
I don't know how "revolvers" came into play?
Great intel & I'm much obliged.
 
Reggie TisFree said:
We all have certain ammo/firearm pet peeves.
Here is one of mine: Ammo for sale with no point of reference concerning its ballistic or chronograph results!! :mad:
I wanted to ask you guys for any potential info concerning these two particular ammo offerings:

1.) SAA -9mm 124 Grain GDHP Nickel-Brass Cased - SAA Personal Protection JHP. It uses a Speer GD bullet. Here is all the customer service rep said, "It's loaded to standard SAAMI spec pressure, not +P or hotter. I do not have chrono data from production otherwise!"

SAA Personal Protection 9mm 124 gr. GDHP Nickel Plated Brass Cased Ammunition For Sale In Stock | Surplus Ammo

2. 9mm Luger +P 124 Grain Di-Cut Jacketed Hollow Point Black Dot Ammo By IMI of Israel
50 Round Box - 9mm Luger +P 124 Grain Di-Cut Jacketed Hollow Point Black Dot Ammo By IMI of Israel | SGAmmo.com
Click to expand...

That IMI +P stuff is essentially Winchester Black Talons.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top