|
 |

05-25-2022, 04:54 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Old Dominion
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 1,419
Liked 11,881 Times in 3,507 Posts
|
|
Pre-War Winchester .357 Magnum Ammunition - Date of Manufacture
__________________
Terry Lester
|
The Following 10 Users Like Post:
|
|

05-25-2022, 10:23 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: illinois
Posts: 6,240
Likes: 1,983
Liked 7,139 Times in 2,223 Posts
|
|
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

05-26-2022, 01:03 AM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sandy Utah
Posts: 9,851
Likes: 2,007
Liked 11,843 Times in 4,462 Posts
|
|
Definitely between 1935 and 1955. From the reference Max posted it should have been Sept. 1953. It indicates the first two numerals are the year, reversed!
__________________
Gunsmithing since 1961
Last edited by Alk8944; 05-26-2022 at 01:07 AM.
|

05-26-2022, 04:34 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: New Iberia, Louisiana
Posts: 4,587
Likes: 25,427
Liked 3,384 Times in 1,737 Posts
|
|
Buddy had some of that. Leaded up his 357 like crazy. And was a lot hotter than the stuff we get today. Frank
|

05-26-2022, 05:36 AM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Great Lakes State
Posts: 31,437
Likes: 14,366
Liked 38,517 Times in 9,021 Posts
|
|
The large primers were only used for a few years after introduction in 1935, so it’s definitely pre-WWII.
Another identifier is the “Winchester Repeating Arms New Haven Conn” line printed on the bottom front of the box. That was removed in 1939, when they added “Division of Western Cartridge Company” to the side.
The box printing changed again in 1945, when the side printing was changed to “Olin Industries”.
Nice find!
__________________
"I also cook."
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

05-26-2022, 09:30 AM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: illinois
Posts: 6,240
Likes: 1,983
Liked 7,139 Times in 2,223 Posts
|
|
I don't think it is a coincidence the numbers after the K are 357. Also you have the large primers as were mentioned. I think this is very early ammo.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alk8944
Definitely between 1935 and 1955. From the reference Max posted it should have been Sept. 1953. It indicates the first two numerals are the year, reversed!
|
|

05-26-2022, 01:15 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 45,494
Liked 1,213 Times in 635 Posts
|
|
The K357OT is a factory stock number. The actual date of manufacture would be the hand stamped number inside the end flap. What I can see appears to be only part of the number. Winchester/Western date codes have been deciphered, I have a chart from the International Ammunition Collectors forum. Basic format for Winchester before 1957 had the first one or two digits as the month followed by the last digit of the year of production. Then a space followed by the date of the month. This system repeats every ten years.
|

05-27-2022, 03:32 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: klagenfurt (austria)
Posts: 137
Likes: 274
Liked 92 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank46
Buddy had some of that. Leaded up his 357 like crazy. And was a lot hotter than the stuff we get today. Frank
|
That's interesting information. I have often read that the 357 magnum in the 1930s were often loaded hotter than the stuff you can get today. It is interesting to read some first hand reports.
I also raised a historical question in my mind. When were the 357 mag loads reduced in power ?
|

06-10-2022, 04:07 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Old Dominion
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 1,419
Liked 11,881 Times in 3,507 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by desi2358
The K357OT is a factory stock number. The actual date of manufacture would be the hand stamped number inside the end flap. What I can see appears to be only part of the number. Winchester/Western date codes have been deciphered, I have a chart from the International Ammunition Collectors forum. Basic format for Winchester before 1957 had the first one or two digits as the month followed by the last digit of the year of production. Then a space followed by the date of the month. This system repeats every ten years.
|
Well I finally got the ammunition in hand and was able to take a better picture of the hand stamped number inside the end flap. It appears to be 111 26 or 111 20; the last digit is stamped in the crease and so is not fully decipherable. Below is the picture…..
So using the Winchester format quoted above I would translate the date code on this box to be November 20 or 26, 1941.
The below pictures are taken from the informative article entitled “Dating Pre-War .357 Magnum Ammo Boxes” written by David Ballantyne and published in the Fall 2014 S&WCA Journal……
So the interesting and/or confusing part of this is that the box of cartridges I just received is the 1935 style (as can be seen in post #1 above), not the 1939 style, but yet the Winchester date code indicates a manufacturing date of November 1941. Perhaps Winchester, like S&W and Colt, never threw anything away and continued using the 1935 style boxes concurrently with the 1939 style boxes until all of the old style boxes were totally depleted.
Does anyone have a different theory?
__________________
Terry Lester
Last edited by lestert357; 06-10-2022 at 04:20 PM.
|

06-10-2022, 04:38 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Dynamo of Dixie
Posts: 938
Likes: 2,411
Liked 2,113 Times in 624 Posts
|
|
I had some handloads that were packed to original specs...hot, hot, hot! Had to wait until they cooled down to extract them from my M28.
|

06-10-2022, 04:54 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,476
Likes: 4
Liked 10,399 Times in 4,728 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by agent00
That's interesting information. I have often read that the 357 magnum in the 1930s were often loaded hotter than the stuff you can get today. It is interesting to read some first hand reports.
I also raised a historical question in my mind. When were the 357 mag loads reduced in power ?
|
I think most published figures in the '50s and '60s were still around 1450 fps muzzle velocity with a 158 grain bullet. Perhaps the reduction was in the '70s?
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

06-11-2022, 01:04 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Spanaway, Wa
Posts: 64
Likes: 2
Liked 107 Times in 41 Posts
|
|
I guess you could say that the 357 Magnum has been slowly downloaded since day one after the first complaint of noise and recoil; in Douglas Wesson’s book “Burning Powders,” he states the 357 Magnum running at 1515fps and 812ft-lbs, which be out of the 8-3/4 inch barrel in 1935.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|