chev37s
Member
I am curious if anyone else is thinking about this.
I have the original optic ready hellcat, an equalizer, and a shield plus. All 13 plus 1 with a spare 15 rnd mag. I have a range in my backyard and shoot 18 to 20 yards. I like to practice at this distance and want to go further but need to do some work on my range to make that happen. I have been trying to shoot these guns and group consistently but have been struggling. The best is the equalizer and shield and the most inconsistent is the hellcat, but I have shot good groups with the laser on it so I know the gun is capable and might be my eyes and / or the sights.I shoot at an 11 x 8.5 inch paper with a square drawn in the middle I can keep them all on the paper but have a lot of problems keeping them grouped in or around the square. Ok for self defense but not where I want to be. For me I think it’s the small size and small grip that is making me inconsistent. I took out my 2.0 compact 9 with the four inch barrel, a psa dagger compact, and recently since I have a bunch of 45’s loaded, I took out my Xd mod 2 45 subcompact and a four inch Kimber pro carry. All of these guns shot much better groups and are in or close around the square in the middle of the paper and it restored my confidence with my shooting ability. I was thinking it was due to being not able to see as good as I used to or maybe I just couldn’t shoot as well as I did in years past but after this experiment I think it’s just the smaller gun and grip size. My point, it might be easier to carry these micro size guns but at what point do you pick being able to hit exactly what you’re aiming at vs being ok accuracy with easy to carry? I am now looking at going back to what I can hit with and shoot well and not carrying due to just the smaller size and comfort. For example, the psa is 15 plus 1 capacity plus a 15 rnd spare and only slightly heavier overall than all three micros. I carry iwb behind the right hip and have no problem concealing it compared to the micros but it is a bit bulkier obviously.
I have the original optic ready hellcat, an equalizer, and a shield plus. All 13 plus 1 with a spare 15 rnd mag. I have a range in my backyard and shoot 18 to 20 yards. I like to practice at this distance and want to go further but need to do some work on my range to make that happen. I have been trying to shoot these guns and group consistently but have been struggling. The best is the equalizer and shield and the most inconsistent is the hellcat, but I have shot good groups with the laser on it so I know the gun is capable and might be my eyes and / or the sights.I shoot at an 11 x 8.5 inch paper with a square drawn in the middle I can keep them all on the paper but have a lot of problems keeping them grouped in or around the square. Ok for self defense but not where I want to be. For me I think it’s the small size and small grip that is making me inconsistent. I took out my 2.0 compact 9 with the four inch barrel, a psa dagger compact, and recently since I have a bunch of 45’s loaded, I took out my Xd mod 2 45 subcompact and a four inch Kimber pro carry. All of these guns shot much better groups and are in or close around the square in the middle of the paper and it restored my confidence with my shooting ability. I was thinking it was due to being not able to see as good as I used to or maybe I just couldn’t shoot as well as I did in years past but after this experiment I think it’s just the smaller gun and grip size. My point, it might be easier to carry these micro size guns but at what point do you pick being able to hit exactly what you’re aiming at vs being ok accuracy with easy to carry? I am now looking at going back to what I can hit with and shoot well and not carrying due to just the smaller size and comfort. For example, the psa is 15 plus 1 capacity plus a 15 rnd spare and only slightly heavier overall than all three micros. I carry iwb behind the right hip and have no problem concealing it compared to the micros but it is a bit bulkier obviously.