Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > General Topics > Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics

Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics Post Your General Gun Topics and Non-S&W Gun and Blade Topics Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-02-2013, 03:59 PM
walnutred walnutred is offline
US Veteran
What the heck was Ruger thinking!!! What the heck was Ruger thinking!!! What the heck was Ruger thinking!!! What the heck was Ruger thinking!!! What the heck was Ruger thinking!!!  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,483
Likes: 821
Liked 3,110 Times in 1,024 Posts
Default What the heck was Ruger thinking!!!

Picked up a 1022 take down a couple weeks ago. Mounted the scope rail that came with it, bought a cheap Tasco 4x scope and borrowed some Weaver rings from a friend. At 25 yards the results were, frustrating. Today I tried a known good scope and a higher set of Weaver rings. The results were still frustrating. Packing things up I noticed that the scope was just a little loose. Rings were tight on the scope but tightened as far as they would go the rings would not clamp tight to the Ruger base. Cheap Simons rings clamped tight but not Weavers. Unbelievable.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-02-2013, 04:42 PM
mod34 mod34 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 133
Liked 1,609 Times in 518 Posts
Default

So, what is the issue? The Ruger take-downs are getting rave reviews including some on this very forum.
Not clear what the gripe is?
__________________
"You're messin' up my Zen"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-02-2013, 04:49 PM
35Rem's Avatar
35Rem 35Rem is offline
Member
What the heck was Ruger thinking!!! What the heck was Ruger thinking!!! What the heck was Ruger thinking!!! What the heck was Ruger thinking!!! What the heck was Ruger thinking!!!  
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SE Alabama, near Dothan
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 772
Liked 791 Times in 365 Posts
Default

****** mounting system is the guns fault...
__________________
War Eagle! '10 BCS & '13 SEC
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-02-2013, 04:53 PM
mod34 mod34 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 133
Liked 1,609 Times in 518 Posts
Default

Ah, gottcha. I hadn't heard of this being a problem.
__________________
"You're messin' up my Zen"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-02-2013, 05:02 PM
LVSteve's Avatar
LVSteve LVSteve is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lost Wages, NV
Posts: 20,302
Likes: 24,973
Liked 29,837 Times in 11,087 Posts
Default

I think it's a tolerance stacking issue between the rings and the rails. I have a red dot sight that will not tighten up on the rail of one rifle, but works perfectly on another.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-02-2013, 05:05 PM
mod34 mod34 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 133
Liked 1,609 Times in 518 Posts
Default

Regarding the Ruger take-down. Perhaps a little strip of mole-skin between the base and clamps?
__________________
"You're messin' up my Zen"
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-02-2013, 05:07 PM
walnutred walnutred is offline
US Veteran
What the heck was Ruger thinking!!! What the heck was Ruger thinking!!! What the heck was Ruger thinking!!! What the heck was Ruger thinking!!! What the heck was Ruger thinking!!!  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,483
Likes: 821
Liked 3,110 Times in 1,024 Posts
Default

No, I like the rifle fine. My complaint is with the Ruger base rail. Apparently I am not the only one who has run into this problem because I read on online review that recommended replacing the Ruger rail with a Weaver base rail. Make me wonder if Weaver bases would fit.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-02-2013, 05:33 PM
kwselke's Avatar
kwselke kwselke is offline
Member
What the heck was Ruger thinking!!! What the heck was Ruger thinking!!! What the heck was Ruger thinking!!! What the heck was Ruger thinking!!! What the heck was Ruger thinking!!!  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,312
Likes: 35,286
Liked 16,951 Times in 3,692 Posts
Default

I'd give Ruger a call and ask what brand of rings they recommend.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #9  
Old 03-03-2013, 02:57 PM
Aticus Aticus is offline
Member
What the heck was Ruger thinking!!! What the heck was Ruger thinking!!! What the heck was Ruger thinking!!! What the heck was Ruger thinking!!! What the heck was Ruger thinking!!!  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Breckenridge Hills, MO
Posts: 1,910
Likes: 1,594
Liked 1,487 Times in 705 Posts
Default

Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't the factory supplied base on the new Ruger have two sides to it? One is for Weaver style rings and the other for the rings sized for 3/8" rings? Try turning the base over and see if that helps.

Just checked the Ruger web site. It comes with a combination scope base. See above.

Last edited by Aticus; 03-03-2013 at 03:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thinking of getting a Ruger American in 22 shell627 Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 9 12-15-2015 02:07 AM
What the heck did I just buy? millerj7 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 34 10-30-2015 02:37 PM
What the heck is it? truckemup97 The Lounge 11 07-12-2013 04:26 PM
What in the heck is this? PIMking S&W-Smithing 1 08-13-2012 10:38 PM
Sell my 5906? What the heck was I thinking! Denver Dick Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 15 07-25-2009 10:59 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:26 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)