Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > General Topics > Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics

Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics Post Your General Gun Topics and Non-S&W Gun and Blade Topics Here


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-15-2013, 09:52 PM
Bob Smalser's Avatar
Bob Smalser Bob Smalser is offline
Member
A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Seabeck, Washinbgton
Posts: 86
Likes: 1
Liked 142 Times in 11 Posts
Default A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle



Once a competition marksman, match armorer and coach for the Army, I enjoy spending my Saturday mornings coaching juniors in a county-wide program run by the Kitsap Rifle and Revolver Club, teaching competitive shooting to youngsters between ages 8 and 18 (photo left above). As the pool of families active in shooting sports diminishes with urbanization, a surprising number of opportunities exist for talented youngsters to win college athletic scholarships, service sponsorship (the right-hand photo is an Army-run clinic for advanced juniors) and ultimately even Olympic Team berths in the various small-bore and air rifle disciplines. While our program has a selection of vintage, entry-level target rifles suitable for the younger juniors (mostly WWII-era Remington 513’s), older and exceptionally talented youngsters rapidly reach the point where they need their own rifle. As most of our parents work at the local naval bases and shipyard or in the timber or construction industries, this poses a problem as high-end rifles like the Anschutz below that provide the best chance for holding a talented youngster’s interest and ultimately winning scholarships cost upwards of $4000 new and $2500 used.



While this Anschutz Model 1913 “Super Match” may look like a space gun, and the action, sights, trigger, barrel and their mountings are certainly “best-quality”, they are still 1890’s technology with some later refinements that have been equaled in many rifles. What makes this rifle the best of the best is its precision barrel and mountings to optimize barrel harmonics (reducing sensitivity to differences in ammunition and other conditions) and its fully-adjustable grip, cheek piece and butt, allowing optimum hand and head placement in each shooting position. Ideally, the grip should be perfectly consistent and the eyes should be dead level when firing in each of the prone, sitting, kneeling and standing positions, because as the rifle fires, the brain anticipates losing control for an instant and the balance mechanisms in the inner ears cause the body to move so as to level itself. This can throw the shot off slightly, especially with slow-moving target bullets and pellets that take a while to leave the barrel. While not as critical during casual shooting or with higher velocity rifles, at this level of competition the challenge is to reduce the probability of making a bad shot across hundreds of scored rounds fired in succession, and every advantage counts, head position being one of the most important.



Fortunately (for shooters if not taxpayers), in the late 1980’s the Army contracted with Kimber of Oregon for 15,000 target rifles to be used as trainers for Junior ROTC, and for a number of reasons never used them. These were built to a standard of consecutive shot groups never larger than .700 inches at 50 yards, and are made with components sufficiently close to or equaling the quality of the $4000+ Anschutz. Their limitations are they were built for children, have short barrels and inadequate stock adjustments, and are somewhat heavy, given the intended audience (although they weigh less than the Anschutz above). As surplus, these new rifles were turned over to the government’s Civilian Marksmanship Program and are available to qualified competitors and clubs for $425 each. I ordered three of them with the intention of converting them into competitive yet affordable high-end target rifles available to parents at cost, and this article is a tutorial on how you can do the same. The techniques I show are all oriented to minimizing shop hours and costs – you may want to use more expensive Anschutz components and a higher level of bedding and finish on your own rifle.



After removing the factory-applied preservatives and minor surface rust from poor storage, I begin with the stock. (The rust I encountered was merely surface flaking limited to the sights and few recesses and was easily removed using Kroil penetrating oil and a small bronze brush.) The Kimber uses simple plastic spacers to adjust length of pull (LOP) from 12 to 13 ½ inches for growing children. I’ll replace these with a 4-Way Buttplate with Hook from Alex Sitman of Master Class Stocks in Bellwood, Pennsylvania ($165.00), the least expensive of the target buttplates that adjust for length, cast, toe-in/out and height. I’ll also retain the stock’s design features so it can be easily put back into original configuration should subsequent owners ever want to use it to train younger children or are concerned about collector value. I chose this option because although the DV buttplate has a large LOP adjustment, I don’t want to cut the stock much shorter than it already is, as the length of the comb where it contacts the cheek is already at close to the minimum length for an adult firing offhand.



The first step is to drill the new base plate to match the stock’s existing buttplate screw inserts. I use the original buttplate as a template to centerpunch the holes, and set the depth stop on the drill press to drill the countersinks first, so the hole and countersink allow the plates to nest perfectly flush with each other.



Because this plate is slightly narrower than the Kimber stock and I want to avoid major work reshaping the stock from the wrist rearward, I’ll make a walnut plate to fair the transition between stock and butt plate while also protecting the stock’s end grain from chipping. Layout of the plate is straightforward, using the drilled base plate as the template to mark hole locations.



The hole in the plate for the buttplate extension is bored plumb on the drill press and its shoulders serve as an index to freehand the deep hole for the buttplate extension. Set the drill press up to do this if you lack experience. An L-shaped jig can be fabricated from half-inch plywood to clamp to the edge of the drill press table to hold the stock vertically.



The final result is a serviceable 4-way buttplate with a minimum LOP of 13 ½” for a small adult, yet with the capability of putting the rifle back into its original buttplate spacer configuration for children. This stock is ready to use for most competitors of average body build.



An alternative of greater benefit to shooters (especially those with long necks) at the expense of spoiling any future collector value is to shorten the stock and install adjustable comb hardware. Here I’ve taped the stock to prevent chipping by the saw and to aid layout. I remove 5/8” of the stock’s length using a large miter saw, reinstall the aluminum base plate assembly and lay out the locations of holes and their depths to decide where to cut the comb. The threaded inserts anchoring the buttplate bolts remove and reinstall easily using an Allen wrench, and are sized to match the existing bolt hole, precluding the need for drilling new pilot holes. To insure all cuts are plumb, I mount the stock to a scrap of sacrificial doorskin using shims and tape, and will cut through the doorskin as well as the stock. I’ve also used heavy cardboard and spray adhesive for this purpose of squaring and plumbing odd-shaped workpieces for cutting…it’s the easiest method to insure perfect cuts on expensive wood. Here I’ve chosen Graco adjustable comb hardware from Brownell’s that easily adjusts using Allen wrenches for cast as well as height. This hardware is more often seen on shotguns than rifles, but at $28 to gunsmiths, it’s by far the most economical solution. These also come with the posts mounted to a plate instead of to disks, but the disks and bushings are perfectly sized to match common Forstner bits and take less shop time to install.



The comb cut is laid out to fall between the holes for the upper buttplate screw and stock extension tube, which is also the optimum place to cut the aluminum base plate. This hardware is typically mounted without cutting the buttplate, but as mentioned previously, the comb on these stocks is already quite short for use by adults in the offhand position, and the base plate can be cut without harming its function to lock the stock extension tube in place. Most bandsaws will cut aluminum, otherwise just use a fine-toothed hack saw blade followed by cleanup with a fine, single-cut file to cut the plate. Insure your resulting comb has sufficient depth to mount the bushings and boreholes necessary to accommodate the full depth of the posts without drilling through the comb top. I mark the centerline of the comb and freehand drill those holes plumb to the surface of the cut using Forstner bits. Then I place the bushings, posts and post screws into the comb holes to mark the centers of the matching base holes in the stock by holding the comb in place and tapping the comb top with a soft mallet, followed by a proper centerpunch.



The disk-shaped post bases and matching bushings are mounted to the stock using epoxy in stages. First the disks and bushings are checked to insure they are flush to the surface of the cut and the hole depths adjusted as necessary. The disk slots and the posts and their mounting screws and nuts are coated with paste wax to insure any epoxy slop won’t stick. Then a small amount of unthickened epoxy is applied to only the sides of the bushing holes, and the hardware and comb assembled in its lowest position for curing in place. This stage tacks the hardware in place in perfect alignment. After curing, double check to insure the comb moves freely in the manner the hardware was designed for. If adjustments are required, use a hot soldering iron to heat the offending disk or bushing to around 180 degrees. This will soften the epoxy and allow the hardware to be easily moved (or even removed), with no harm to the epoxy bond once it cools. The after everything is cured and aligned, another coat of unthickened epoxy spatula’d around the edges of the holes and gently warmed using a heat gun will thin the second coat to the consistency of water, allowing it to seep into small spaces to thoroughly glue the hardware to the wood. The epoxy can also be dyed to match the wood using pigments made for that purpose. Here I’m using West System 5:1 boatbuilder’s epoxy, but any marine epoxy or Brownell’s Acraglass will work fine if you avoid the quick-setting hardeners and gel epoxies that can’t be thinned using heat. After curing I carefully drill and tap the comb for the 10-24 X 1/4 set screws that hold the comb at the desired height. Insure you don’t mount these too close to the cut to avoid splitting in use.



Before final assembly, I adjust the trigger from the 4lbs set at the factory to the 3lb minimum for competitions conducted under NRA Rules. The rifle is shipped with a complete user’s manual and also the technical manual page that describes trigger and sear adjustment. Note I use an orange-colored plastic dummy round in the chamber to protect the firing pin when dry-firing. A major disadvantage of these rifles is that the contract was terminated before repair parts were manufactured, and none are available except from the occasional parted-out rifle found on internet auction sites. Lose or break a hard-to-find part, and you may have to fabricate one from scratch. Accordingly, I maintain a “saved search” for Kimber 82 Government parts on all the major auction sites to receive email notifications when spare parts become available.



Because of the short 25” barrel, I install a barrel extension (bloop tube) to bring the barrel length to the 30” maximum allowed in competitions conducted under International rules. The further the distance between front and rear sights, the easier the alignment, and five inches of increased sight radius is worth the investment. Jim Beck of Champion’s Choice Shooter’s Supply in LaVergne, Tennessee sells an 8” tube with mating collar for $66, and for another $10 will machine the collar to fit the .952” barrel diameter at the muzzle. I also buy their adjustable palm rest for offhand shooting ($34), and both their right-hand and left-hand contoured “Jumbo” front hand stops ($32), which I much prefer to the undersize hand stop that comes with the rifle, as there is less pinching of the supporting hand to distract new shooters.



The stock bloop tube is 1 ¼” too long to meet the 30” maximum barrel length (measured to the bolt face using a cleaning rod against the closed bolt), so I cut it using hack saw and facing cutter and drill and tap the necessary 6-48 hole to remount the mounting block for the front sight.



I don’t work with factory-new firearms very often, and was surprised that reassembly of the action-to-stock bolts was unnecessarily difficult. This could have damaging consequences if assembled by a child, and examination revealed the typical burring caused by drilling and tapping wasn’t cleaned up at the factory before assembly. So I removed the burrs using a hand-turned, 45-degree countersink and a fine-toothed pillar file and chased the threads with a ¼-28 tap. Note that the recoil lug mounts in a dovetail and is held in place by a set screw. This design allows some movement of the action in the stock to insure the barrel remains free floating.



After torquing down the stock bolts, I double check to insure the barrel is free floating along its entire length, and is centered in the barrel channel. Discrepancies here can be adjusted by moving the recoil lug above, or in serious cases of stock warp, by removing wood from the barrel channel. I prefer to snug the locking-lug bolt down tight and apply a bit less torque to the rear action bolt so there is no danger of distorting the action, but you can play with various bolt torques as you shoot to see if they make any difference in the rifle’s performance. Pillar bedding the action is a further enhancement that is relatively inexpensive when the shooter reaches the point where minor improvements in accuracy will make a difference. Although I applied a thin coat of oil-based sealer to the inletting and fresh stock cuts I made, I don’t bother improving the stock’s cosmetics, as they don’t affect function.



The final result is an attractive rifle with that traditional forged-milled-steel and quality-walnut look I’ve always admired, but the proof comes in how well it shoots. The limiting factor in whether a rifle will consistently hit a pencil point at 50 feet or a dime at 50 yards is generally the ammunition, not the rifle, and there have been a number of user accuracy tests done with these surplus Kimbers, the results of one of the most thorough by Sergey Solyanik of Seattle are shown below. These are 5-shot groups fired from a bench rest at 100 meters using a 36-power scope, minimizing all factors except the rifle and brand of ammunition (and Sergey’s ability to dope wind). Measurements are in inches, and keep in mind that the most difficult target used in small-bore competition is the 50-meter International target with a .409 inch 10-ring…half the distance of this test:

Lapua Midas: .80, .78, 1.08, 1.12, .73, .83, .94, .66, .92, .72
Wolf MT: .94, .60, .84, 1.22, 2.27 (1 flier), .71, .62, .60, .67, .99
Federal Target: 1.13, 1.09, 1.21, .59, .86, .80, 1.12, 1.17, 1.04, .91
Federal Ultra Match: .83, .50, .71, .90, .78, .83, .98, .40, .46, .53
Eley Tenex: .64, .62, .65, 1.45, .99, 1.00, 1.42, .89, 1.81 (1 flier), 1.24
CCI Standard Target: 1.79, .65, 1.18, .25, .50
CCI Blazer: .91, 1.26, 1.16, 3.02 (1 flier)

All these results exceed the performance capabilities of most teenagers. The results for the Federal Ultra Match and Lapua Midas exceed the capabilities of many Olympians. While sacrificing some convenience and precision in stock adjustment with the upgraded Kimber compared to the Anschutz 1913, there is little risk that junior shooters will reach the stage of proficiency where they can hold tighter than this rifle can shoot….and for a total bill under $750 as opposed to $4000+.

Bob Smalser, July, 2013.
Tools and Wood with Bob Smalser

Notes:

Jim Beck of Champion’s Choice Shooter’s Supply in LaVergne, Tennessee. Sight extension $33, collar $33, and palm rest $34. Machining to fit a .952 muzzle $10.

Alex Sitman of Master Class Stocks in Bellwood, Pennsylvania. DV 4-way Buttplate with hook. $165.

Brownells Gunsmithing Supply in Montezuma, Iowa. Graco adjustable comb hardware $28-44.

Weights are 10.75lbs for the stock Kimber, 11.2lbs for the Kimber as built, and 12.76lbs for the Anschutz 1913 in aluminum.
Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 07-15-2013, 10:10 PM
redneckemt redneckemt is offline
Member
A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Tenn
Posts: 453
Likes: 291
Liked 321 Times in 141 Posts
Default

...........

Last edited by redneckemt; 07-16-2013 at 08:19 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-15-2013, 10:58 PM
RonJ RonJ is offline
US Veteran
Absent Comrade
A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 3,939
Likes: 4,106
Liked 2,582 Times in 1,106 Posts
Default

This is mine. I use it for informal bench rest shooting.
Shoots fine but would do better with a more consistent trigger pull.

__________________
Regards, Ron
USASA 1965/69
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-16-2013, 01:08 AM
Frank46 Frank46 is offline
US Veteran
A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle  
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: New Iberia, Louisiana
Posts: 4,587
Likes: 25,427
Liked 3,384 Times in 1,737 Posts
Default

I bought one of the H&R Model 12 single shot 22 target rifles. Total cost was $300 plus whatever costs for shipping. Came with the following Redfield Palma rear sight with mounting adaptor and screws, front sight was a Redfield Olympic globe sight with about 25 inserts. At the time we joked buy the sights (used ones were going for 300) and they gave you the rifle. Mine was pretty accurate but could never get the trigger the way I wanted. And the comb on the top of the stock where your cheek would go was so high and thick a good cheekweld was darn near impossible. But with a scope mounted (Redfield 3200 24x) I could at least get 1 1/4" groups at 100 yds. A target shooter I'm not. Good read, well done, tools used and sources for components. Excellent article. Frank
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-16-2013, 11:18 PM
mtgianni mtgianni is offline
Member
A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SW MT
Posts: 7,471
Likes: 12,048
Liked 6,983 Times in 3,427 Posts
Default

I refereed biathlon for a few years. The russian Biakal would come close to an Aunschutz but @ 900+ they were not a cheap alternative. Savage had a Biathlon model they furnished as a trial for new shooters that shot well but had a typical Savage trigger. There was another US product furnished, it might have been Remington but accuracy was basic.
__________________
Front sight and squeeze
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-17-2013, 06:46 AM
Intheshop Intheshop is offline
Member
A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle  
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Mnts. of Va.
Posts: 121
Likes: 34
Liked 47 Times in 33 Posts
Default

Nice write-up,thanks for posting.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-17-2013, 08:46 AM
kraigwy kraigwy is offline
US Veteran
A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Newcastle WY
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 245
Liked 1,058 Times in 319 Posts
Default

Bob,

Excellent article. I'd like to see you re-post it on the CMP forum. A lot of people got these kembers for their juniors or junior programs.

I think your article would be well received and helpful over there.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-17-2013, 10:49 AM
BigBill BigBill is offline
Absent Comrade
A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 13,869
Likes: 2,079
Liked 13,358 Times in 5,550 Posts
Default

What about the Romanian target rifles that are imported today, there used
but look ok for a project rifle with there heavy bull barrels.

Nice job on the one you reworked.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-17-2013, 12:11 PM
Bob Smalser's Avatar
Bob Smalser Bob Smalser is offline
Member
A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Seabeck, Washinbgton
Posts: 86
Likes: 1
Liked 142 Times in 11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kraigwy View Post
Bob,

Excellent article. I'd like to see you re-post it on the CMP forum. A lot of people got these kembers for their juniors or junior programs.

I think your article would be well received and helpful over there.

I tried it, but can't seem to get that forum to post photos, only links to photos.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-17-2013, 12:14 PM
H Richard's Avatar
H Richard H Richard is offline
US Veteran
A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle A Competitive Yet Affordable Target Rifle  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 23,057
Likes: 20,893
Liked 23,921 Times in 8,727 Posts
Default

Some years ago when it was the DCM vs the CMP they furnished free rifles for shooting programs. We had 8 or 10 Garands, and when filling out the required annual report with how many shooters shot how many times (by age bracket) I noticed a small comment: "Do you need any additional rifles?" They listed the Kimbers along with the Garands etc and I requested a couple. I received two brand new unfired rifles with sights and slings. After the strip down and scrub out of all the preservative I took to the range and sighted them in. I was impressed by how well they shot. These rifles did get good use at our club by juniors, (and a couple of Sr's). When the change came to the DCM to morph into the CMP the guns were returned as the club could not afford to buy them at the time.

Have you any contact with a "Friends of NRA" committee in your area? They can possibly furnish you with the access to grants to help purchase guns, ammo, range upgrades, etc. All of the money raised by the "Friends of NRA" stays within the state it is raised in. Support them!
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Winchester Rifle, "U.S." marked 52D Target Rifle (pics).... canoeguy Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 5 12-30-2013 08:21 PM
Competitive Shooting aaorb104 Smith & Wesson Competitive Shooting 2 12-21-2013 11:14 PM
looking for a forum on competitive rifle shooting Prof_Fate Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 4 10-19-2012 08:00 PM
Help With Target Rifle 4 Paws Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 16 04-26-2009 09:16 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:10 PM.


© 2000-2025 smith-wessonforum.com All rights reserved worldwide.
Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)