sigp220.45
US Veteran
I started getting back into cap and ball revolvers when I came across a Ruger Old Army at a good price. They had just been discontinued and I had a muzzleoader deer hunt coming up so I snatched it up. I had a bit of a learning curve (http://smith-wessonforum.com/firear...s/398065-breaking-code-my-ruger-old-army.html) but it turned into one of my favorite guns.
I had owned some cheap brass-framed C&B revolvers before, so my impression of Italian BP guns wasn't great. Then I came across this Uberti Walker (marked as a Dragoon) at a local shop and was able to get it for $200 OTD, probably because it was so gummed up the cylinder wouldn't turn.

I got it apart, cleaned up some sticky goo, and it was good as new. Whatever was holding it up wasn't black powder residue, and the bore and chambers look unused.

I love Walkers. The idea of the two Sams (Walker and Colt) putting their heads together to make the perfect weapon for Texas horsemen to use against fearsome Comanche warriors and coming up this monster makes me smile. I appreciate the improvements made in the later Dragoons, but they just don't have the same appeal to me as these wonderful purpose-built man (and horse) killers.
The quality of this Uberti is readily apparent. The bluing and color case hardening are first rate, as is the wood-to-metal fit.


While I was picking it up, I saw this little guy in the case. Also $200 OTD, so I laid it away.

Also an Uberti, but imported by Cimarron. The store had it marked as a "Texas Model", but Cimarron calls it a Pocket Navy. Colt called them "The Pocket Model in Navy Caliber", and its also known as the 1862 Pocket Navy.

It's a five shot .36, meant to be an improvement in power over the 1849 Pocket .31 calibers. Its about the size of a Ruger Bearcat with a longer barrel.

I've read the Cimarrons are a step above the standard Ubertis in quality. This one is certainly a well made gun. Fit and finish are first rate.

Here's an idea of relative size.


I'd be interested to hear other's experiences with these newer imports, and opinions as to quality.
I had owned some cheap brass-framed C&B revolvers before, so my impression of Italian BP guns wasn't great. Then I came across this Uberti Walker (marked as a Dragoon) at a local shop and was able to get it for $200 OTD, probably because it was so gummed up the cylinder wouldn't turn.

I got it apart, cleaned up some sticky goo, and it was good as new. Whatever was holding it up wasn't black powder residue, and the bore and chambers look unused.

I love Walkers. The idea of the two Sams (Walker and Colt) putting their heads together to make the perfect weapon for Texas horsemen to use against fearsome Comanche warriors and coming up this monster makes me smile. I appreciate the improvements made in the later Dragoons, but they just don't have the same appeal to me as these wonderful purpose-built man (and horse) killers.
The quality of this Uberti is readily apparent. The bluing and color case hardening are first rate, as is the wood-to-metal fit.


While I was picking it up, I saw this little guy in the case. Also $200 OTD, so I laid it away.

Also an Uberti, but imported by Cimarron. The store had it marked as a "Texas Model", but Cimarron calls it a Pocket Navy. Colt called them "The Pocket Model in Navy Caliber", and its also known as the 1862 Pocket Navy.

It's a five shot .36, meant to be an improvement in power over the 1849 Pocket .31 calibers. Its about the size of a Ruger Bearcat with a longer barrel.

I've read the Cimarrons are a step above the standard Ubertis in quality. This one is certainly a well made gun. Fit and finish are first rate.

Here's an idea of relative size.


I'd be interested to hear other's experiences with these newer imports, and opinions as to quality.