• Update – 12:30 PM EST
    Attachments are now working, and all members can once again upload files.
    We are currently testing URL redirects and other miscellaneous features across the site.
    Thank you for your continued patience and support during this migration.

    Prefer a darker look? You can switch between light and dark modes in your account settings:
    smith-wessonforum.com/account/preferences

Ruger Mark II Target Government Model *** NOW WITH PICS!! Post # 6

I use my Ruger to test ammo at 50 yards +. Most 22 ammo in the last 5 years will go off but not group. Mine is not a government but they shoot the same. They will shoot standard--H.V.-& faster without a problem. It helps with making the target guns last longer. A blue bull barrel mark 11 is the best cheapest 22 pistol you can buy out of the box.<Your friends will probably kick you out of the golf & country club if you buy it.>
 

Attachments

  • DSC04637.jpg
    DSC04637.jpg
    147.7 KB · Views: 112
Last edited:
About 5 months ago I started watching these on gun broker, always liked them. They supposedly had to meet some accuracy requirement before they left the factory and is a copy of the ones the government ordered. I believe they were made in blue and stainless but the blued ones came out first somewhere in the 80's. Did the same thing, walked into a gun shop and there it was, at a very reasonable price. Mine is the 6 7/8 blue version. Put a red fiber optic front sight on it and shoot it regularly. The club has a ransom rest and mine likes CCI blazer, the cheap stuff. I may buy different grips for it sometime in the future with nice wood. It's a nice gun and will give you years of fun. Disassembly is fough at first but follow the directions and it's easy. Enjoy yours, Larry
 
I use to be into Rugers but quit them when the New Models came
out. 99% of my purchases are blue, older S&Ws. Lately things
have been slow and I picked up a Ruger stainless, 51/2" bull
barrel target at a yard sale. I shot it and found it shot as well as
my old M1 Target. I have never owned a Govt. model but was
pleasantly surprised by this one.
 
Ok.. I could not resist, went back to the LGS, and it was still there:D:D.
There was a thread about " Guns that talk to you ":eek::rolleyes::D
This one did!

I ran some rounds through it for function, it ran like a sewing machine. I have one thing to say...

TREE RATS BEWARE!!!!!!:rolleyes:;):D

IMG_2555.jpg


IMG_2556.jpg


IMG_2557.jpg
 
Last edited:
Nice Score! Beautiful example of what is likely the best "bang for the buck", competition worthy target pistol made. You've be very pleased with how it shoots. These were all tackdrivers (including my own.) In fact, when the US governnment ordered them as trainers, they imposed an accuracy specification. As I recall, the government models had a tighter, heat treated chamber and came with a test target proving they could meet stringent accuracy standards set by the government. ( 1.5" at 25 You won't have to Google far to find ALLOT of info on these guns.

Here is a quick sample:
"In 1986 came the Mark II Government Target Model, which can best be described as the "competition-grade" version of the Ruger 22 autoloader line. In essence, this new gun is a 6 7/8-inch Bull Barrel version of the Mark II Target Model with higher profile adjustable sights. It was created to meet U.S. Military specifications for match-grade pistols and was chosen as the standard target and training handgun of the US Armed Forces, replacing earlier models from Ruger and other manufacturers. "

p.s I still keep , 7 Ruger MK II/III pistols. in my safe despite owning target rimfires that cost 3x as much. That's how much I have grown to like them.
 
I own a MK I and a MK II heavy barrel and they are both tack drivers, when coupled with ammo that they like they will rival any of my other target 22 auto's. You made a good buy for your first Ruger.
 
not a government.but

Bought this MKIII and hated the trigger. I couldn't see the black sights very well. The magazine had to be pried out and the tear down was weird. I replaced the trigger with a Volquartsen adjustable trigger, installed a MKII hammer bushing and put a set of Williams fire sights on it. It has the 5 1/2 " barrel and is really accurate. I added the light for frogging now and then. The mag drops freely after I got rid of the mag safety. I think you will love that gun. The molded grips feel a little strange, but the grip sleeve helps.
Peace,
Gordon
 

Attachments

  • DSCN3574.jpg
    DSCN3574.jpg
    122.9 KB · Views: 41
  • DSCN3550.jpg
    DSCN3550.jpg
    56.8 KB · Views: 21
Bought this MKIII and hated the trigger. I couldn't see the black sights very well. The magazine had to be pried out and the tear down was weird. I replaced the trigger with a Volquartsen adjustable trigger, installed a MKII hammer bushing and put a set of Williams fire sights on it. It has the 5 1/2 " barrel and is really accurate. I added the light for frogging now and then. The mag drops freely after I got rid of the mag safety. I think you will love that gun. The molded grips feel a little strange, but the grip sleeve helps.
Peace,
Gordon

The tear down isn't bad once you realize that hammer position is the key (!!) to proper reassembly. YouTube has a couple of good demos on the topic. Truth be told that these guns can run thousands of rounds between tear downs anyway. That said, there is an inexpensive kit from Majestic Arms that will allow you to pull the bolt and access the internals without splitting the receiver off. The same kit lowers trigger pull to about 3# as well.

p.s. Ruger has just come out with a new MK IV model with push button disassembly to cure their reputation in the disassembly area. Looks interesting but not sure I'd trust it. I'm still a devout MK II guy and will likely remain so at this point.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top