|
 |

12-28-2018, 11:02 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 589
Likes: 817
Liked 1,596 Times in 404 Posts
|
|
Beretta 84FS Cheetah
I am a big fan of “Old School” .380’s. I have plenty of experience with the Walther PPK and Sig P230. I know there are smaller and lighter options out there but I really enjoy the old school heft of a DA/SA .380. That being said, I have never had the opportunity to use a Beretta 84FS Cheetah. If you have experience with this gun please share your experience and/or perspective. I may add to the collection at some point.
Last edited by Cellar Hound; 12-28-2018 at 11:03 PM.
|

12-28-2018, 11:13 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,606
Likes: 29,672
Liked 36,312 Times in 5,715 Posts
|
|
I have the Model 81 - the .32 ACP that holds fewer rounds than the .380 version. I love it - elegant and easy to shoot.
__________________
Rule of law, not a man.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

12-28-2018, 11:14 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 3,338
Liked 4,270 Times in 1,042 Posts
|
|
I own the single stack version, the 85fs. I had a black finish, and now have this nickel one.
It’s bigger than the PPK, but identical in length as the SIG p232 (both of which I’ve owned in the past). The double stack version 84 is thicker.
Out of the three, I prefer the Beretta 80 series. Reassembly is tricky but once you get the hang of its fine. Make sure to refresh the recoil spring often as the alloy frame will get beat up.
They are good guns.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

12-28-2018, 11:19 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 235
Likes: 167
Liked 299 Times in 105 Posts
|
|
I had one at one time and loved it but found it too large for concealed carry. They're very well made and very accurate. I do prefer a PPK, although I don't own or carry a .380 anymore. Again they are great guns enjoy them.
|

12-28-2018, 11:19 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Suburban Deeeetroit
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 144
Liked 1,606 Times in 756 Posts
|
|
There's another thread out there about this pistol. Great gun but with the blow back design and warm SD loads it will beat the web of your hand.
For SD its fine. If you have the need to go blasting - it will get your notice after about 10-15 shots - IMO.
|

12-29-2018, 01:47 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 573
Likes: 398
Liked 623 Times in 205 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 505Gibbs
There's another thread out there about this pistol. Great gun but with the blow back design and warm SD loads it will beat the web of tryour hand.
For SD its fine. If you have the need to go blasting - it will get your notice after about 10-15 shots - IMO.
|
Is it straight blow back?
I thought Beretta used a Browning style link.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|

12-29-2018, 01:54 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,596
Likes: 6,989
Liked 9,335 Times in 2,759 Posts
|
|
Try a CZ-82 or CZ-83. Much better fighting pistols.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

12-29-2018, 02:14 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Desert South West
Posts: 5,360
Likes: 7,394
Liked 8,722 Times in 2,318 Posts
|
|
I have owned the 84, 85 and much scarcer 86 with tip up barrel. I like them for their accuracy, design and heft and they just look sharp. I don’t try to CC with it but I find them very nice shooters I like the CZ 83 as well as the PPK. Then the old old school Colt model 1908 hammerless. My wife carries and shoots the Sig P238 very well.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
John 1:17
NRA Life Benefactor
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

12-29-2018, 02:28 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lost Wages, NV
Posts: 22,360
Likes: 29,186
Liked 33,778 Times in 12,480 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromedhearts
Is it straight blow back?
I thought Beretta used a Browning style link.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
They are straight blowback and kick more than a Kahr CW9.
__________________
Release the Kraken
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

12-29-2018, 02:35 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 604
Likes: 21
Liked 660 Times in 284 Posts
|
|
I have a Model 84 that I bought new in 2010. The pistol is absolutely reliable and accurate enough. If you're familiar with the PPK, then you know what a little hand biter the .380 can be. The Beretta is a little better because of its bulk. Small hands will have difficulty cycling the action. The big negative on this gun was the price. I think that there are used ones out there in the $350 range.
This pistol is no longer in Beretta's on-line catalogue, so it may be out of production. I don't think it was ever very popular in the United States.
|

12-29-2018, 02:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Alabama
Posts: 188
Likes: 253
Liked 188 Times in 78 Posts
|
|
I use to CC the 84 a lot. So much so, I had a gunsmith remove the front sight, mill in a dovetail and install a Trijicon front sight. I also had him enlarge the rearsight opening. This reduced accuracy a little, but i gained faster targer acquisition in both daytime and in lowlight situations while still being accurate enough. I carried it in an IWB holster and loaded it with Buffalo Bore 90 grain +P jhp bullets. It is in the same size catagory as my S&W 6906, Colt Officer 1911 LW, and Sig 229 Carry(3.5" barrel). Recoil never bothered me, I also shot(loaded and shot at range seldom) the Colt with 185 grain +P. I love the looks and its feel in my hand. You just have to realize that it is a .380 and know its capability and limitations. I don't understand why people think a .380 has to be chambered in a subcompact pocket pistol. While American police officers were carrying a 6 shot, 4 inch, .38 Special revolver, many European police officers were carrying the 84 or similar pistols in .380.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|