Mildly interested in a Webley Mk VI .455 Revolver until I checked the prices on GB.
When did these "Clunkers" become so expensive ?
When did these "Clunkers" become so expensive ?
Webley .455 Revolver
- Thread starter jimmyj
- Start date
Register to hide this ad
Yeah, the .455's are Pythonesque in their price inflation these days.
LVSteve
Member
Because original ones are hard to come by. Many have been shaved to take 45 ACP.
Texas Star
US Veteran
There is also more interest in collecting British military arms.
Thuer
Member
I am happy that mine is not altred.
deadin
US Veteran
What's kind of ironic is both of my MK VI's have been altered, but my S&W 1st and 2nd Model .455's haven't been touched. Go figure.........
LVSteve
Member
No kidding. The price Enfields are going for these days makes me think I need more insurance.
Protected One
Member
Finding ammo is the other issue. And the PRICES?.....Whew!
I have had two old Wobblies- a MK IV and a MK V. The MK IV was still a .455. I was able to load mine with .45 Colt brass and deep seated bullets over reduced powder charges. I later found some CIL .455 ammo for it. The MK V was cleaned with sandpaper (or so it seems) and rechambered to .45 ACP/.45 Auto Rim. I bought it back in the '90s for $75 and ran standard ACP ammo through it. Since then, I have discovered these loads are approaching proof levels, so normal ACP ammo is out. I need to load some mild ammo for it.
Back in the '70s, when I bought the MK IV, a little while I found a MK VI with target sights. I had to sell the MK IV to afford it and by the time I got the cash, the MK VI was gone. I didn't know enough back then to ask if I could put it on lay-a-way.
Back in the '70s, when I bought the MK IV, a little while I found a MK VI with target sights. I had to sell the MK IV to afford it and by the time I got the cash, the MK VI was gone. I didn't know enough back then to ask if I could put it on lay-a-way.
Last edited:
Rock185
US Veteran
Yep, They were considered kinda weird old clunkers for so many years. Now the ones uncut for .45ACP have become collectibles, with attendant collector prices. Even the ratty ones rode hard and put up wet, with very little original finish, if uncut bring $$$$.
My Mk VI, cut for .45ACP, is not collectible and was not expensive, but still functions as it should and is fun to shoot once in a while.
My Mk VI, cut for .45ACP, is not collectible and was not expensive, but still functions as it should and is fun to shoot once in a while.
Attachments
I've owned a few of these, most had been shaved for 45ACP but had a couple that were still 455. Great guns, simple, reliable and fun to shoot. Shot mainly lead bullet handloads in the ACP ones as they seemed more accurate than jacketed rounds (and after I found out about the pressure difference I quit using factory ammo altogether).
The 455 ones cost more to shoot though Fiocchi ammo was at least fairly available (and the later Fiocchi was boxer primed so reloadable). Prices started to really climb a few years ago and eventually I sold off all but one of mine. The last one I have is a MK I, shaved sadly but I load 45 Auto Rim brass to duplicate the 455 load and am quite happy with it.
The 455 ones cost more to shoot though Fiocchi ammo was at least fairly available (and the later Fiocchi was boxer primed so reloadable). Prices started to really climb a few years ago and eventually I sold off all but one of mine. The last one I have is a MK I, shaved sadly but I load 45 Auto Rim brass to duplicate the 455 load and am quite happy with it.
Geno44
Member
How big a price hit do the converted ones take?
Baltimoreed11754
Member
They are neat old revolvers, wouldn’t call them clunkers. I picked up a couple of .455 cylinders years ago and replaced the shaved cylinders of my MkIV and MkVI with them. My first 2, a MkI and the MkIV cost 150.00 each while my next to last, a Webley Wilkinson 1905 cost 10 times as much. My last was a .455 Fosbery. Not going to say what that one cost but it’s a very cool revolver.
Attachments
Last edited:
Protocall_Design
Member
What does it look like?
Baltimoreed11754
Member
They also used Prideaux speedloaders.
Last edited:
Somehow I got the urge a few years ago to get a .455 Webley, but I was determined that I would only get an uncut one. Places years ago were asking some astronomical prices for unshaved pieces, but with patience and persistence I found a Mark VI at a shop in Ohio at a price I was willing to pay. It's an amazing shooter. I had a lot of fun with it at my club's Great Wars match. There is a judge in the next county who heard me talk about it and I could probably sell it to him tomorrow, but that's not going to happen as long as I'm still walking around.
Absalom
SWCA Member, Absent Comrade
I think that depends on whether you only deploy them from your gun safe, or whether you have to lug one around on your belt all day while doing heavy physical labor, like the troops in the ammunition columns
The down-sizing to the smaller .38 frame was bemoaned much more loudly by US gun writers post-WW II than by anyone in the British Army.
For the record, I think they’re really neat guns too, I just wouldn’t want to have to carry one.
Baltimoreed11754
Member
Just looked on line and the weight of a mty MkVI and a 1911 are 38-40 oz, about 2.5 pounds. You get 2 or 3 more rds worth of weight in the 1911. I’d rather carry the 1911. I also think that if I were in my twenties, through basic and in shape it wouldn’t be that much more to endure. As a 70 year old my edc’s are all lightweights and I also wouldn't want to carry either steel handgun. Wearing a gunbelt, two .45 revolvers or a revolver and a 1911 and a shotgun shell belt for a 4-5 hour cas match is not difficult, at least not yet. Besides, Josie carried 4 revolvers and two were Walker conversions.
Attachments
Last edited:
Similar threads
