• Update – 12:30 PM EST
    Attachments are now working, and all members can once again upload files.
    We are currently testing URL redirects and other miscellaneous features across the site.
    Thank you for your continued patience and support during this migration.

    Prefer a darker look? You can switch between light and dark modes in your account settings:
    smith-wessonforum.com/account/preferences

Any Remington model 51 fans?

Puller

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 25, 2020
Messages
2,260
Reaction score
9,625
Location
North Mississippi
I acquired my Remington model 51 in 380 ACP from my uncle. He bought it back in the mid 1950's and said he'd hardly ever shot it.

Designed by John Pedersen, Remington manufactured approximately 65,000 Model 51 pistols in .32 ACP and .380 ACP calibers from 1918 to 1927, though small numbers were assembled into the mid-1930s from left over components.

Ergonomics are great and is a easy gun to carry, but the safety and sights are smallish by modern standards.

91387507_244683730006570_168713178744619008_o.jpg
 
There are four variations of the 51, two in .380 and two in .32. I once had examples of all of them, but at present I have only the .380s. Probably the most ergonomic pistol design ever made, and very thin. Needlessly complicated for a .32 or .380 pistol, but it works well. The much more recent Remington R51 in 9mm has the same design but it didn't work out too well.
 
Those are fine pistols. Remington did a major ergonomic study designing the grip for those things. It wasn't just a lucky guess. It was expensive for its time and did not sell well, mostly because of that. Getting spare magazines for them now days is both difficult and expensive. I have one in .380 and it shoots like a dream.
 
I'm a big fan. Interestingly enough, Remington made and sold more in .380 caliber than they did in .32 ACP, which is opposite of the production numbers of the Colt M1903 & M1908 and the Savage 1907 and 1917 models.
Since .380's in Savage and Colt seem to bring more money, many dealers who are unfamiliar with the PA51 also price the .380's higher which means that there are some occasional bargains in the .32 ACP versions which are actually more scarce..
 
Ive heard the originals are great guns but I've got no experience with them. They look fantastic.

Shame Remington dropped the ball so hard with the reintroduction :/ I was really interested in one
 
I have been into 51s for forty years. There are 5 .380s for every .32

Wonderful pistols built like a Swiss watch. No screws. Just pins. Can be COMPLETELY disassembled in the field using just the firing pin as a drift!

Here is one of each.
 

Attachments

  • Rem51 (3).jpg
    Rem51 (3).jpg
    119.9 KB · Views: 79
  • Rem51 (9).jpg
    Rem51 (9).jpg
    101.2 KB · Views: 64
Mine was a .380. Old Investigators/Detectives called the Model 51 "The Steel Finger" because it pointed like your finger. I loaned mine to a "newby" for "Off Duty" until He could afford to purchase His own. He went to another Agency and so did my Model 51.
 
I’ve wanted one for years, but whenever one shows up, seems like I’m in the process of getting something I wanted more.

With any luck, I’ll get one some day.
 
The one I had was a great shooter. I believe I got a spare aftermarket magazine made by TripleK and it worked great.
 
Every so often we have a discussion on them here and I like seeing the new comments and pictures every time.

As I’ve said before, the one I have languished in the bottom back part of a gun shops case for YEARS. It was so dusty you could hardly tell what it was. I finally felt sorry for it and gave it a good home. I didn’t have to pay that much for it. It’s a .32.

The only problem I have with it is that my wife says it’s hers. She said that it fits her hand just perfect. I tried explaining that it fits everyone’s hand that way and why. She’s not convinced so I guess it’s hers. :mad: It’s not a perfect example like the others but it’s still a nice representation of them.

Jim
 

Attachments

  • CFF22FED-7A86-4D07-8A6B-0CDF8882BB11.jpg
    CFF22FED-7A86-4D07-8A6B-0CDF8882BB11.jpg
    51 KB · Views: 64
I really like the look of it, like a cross between the Colt 1903 Pocket Hammerless and Walther PP.

I was really hyped when I first heard that Remington was reviving it some years back, but we all know how that turned out... (Basically a cautionary tale of trying to upconvert a firearm for a stronger cartridge complete with cost saving measures.)
 
I had been looking for one for 5 or 6 years, just to have one. every one I saw was priced more than I wanted to pay for a gun I never planned on shooting much ( besides that it wasn't a Smith). Cheaper '51s I saw had been messed with or had bad reblues. About a year ago I was at a small gunshow and ran into a guy about to leave that was complaining about the lowballing the dealers were offering for his '51. I looked at it(85%), I asked if he wanted an offer or what did he want for it. He said $300 and I didn't counter offer I just handed him the money. Now I owned 2 Remington pistols, the other is a 1858 cap and ball I picked up when I bought a small estate and decided to keep on a whim.
SWCA 892
 
I recently acquired one of the Gen 2 R51 pistols in 9mm. The Gen 2 pistols came out in 2016 following the 2014 debacle of the original 9mm model. During a recent range trip I managed to get it to malfunction once with 124 gr Blazer Brass, a stovepipe with loose unfired round underneath. Not seen that before. The few Winchester 115 gr JHPs I had worked just fine.

Sig 238, 380EZ and Remington R51 at the range
 
It took me years to find a nice one at the right price - but I finally did it about 10 years ago. The ergonomics are superb; Pederson made a lot of wooden mock-ups and had quite a few people try them to find the configuration most folks found most comfortable.

Great little gun despite smallish sights and a rather complex disassembly procedure.

I covered it thoroughly in my book 101 Classic Firearms, and included a biography on John Pedersen.

John

REM_51_zps1iyxswys.jpg
 
Last edited:
I have two Remington m51s; both are .380s. One is from 1920, the other 1924. Neither cost $300 or less even though it was several years ago. Anyway, the older has almost no remaining finish, the other is near new. As noted they are built like a Swiss clock; these also RUN like a S......
However, at the end of the day they are still .380s. I haven’t used them for anything. I carry a SIG 229 .357 with DAK trigger.

At my house this search started with an article in an old Gun Digest. The group now has most most of information offered there except the Navy requested quotes and examples in lieu 1911s some time after those had been selected. Remington submitted M51s in .45 ACP. These passed tHe tests but weren’t selected.

Additionally, in the movie I think I remember that General Patton was being straffed at his headquarters in Tunisia by a German JU88 fighter bomber..
 
Last edited:
" Remington submitted M51s in .45 ACP. These passed tHe tests but weren’t selected."

The Remington .45s were called the Model 53, basically an enlarged Model 51, and the driving force behind them was the U. S. Navy which wanted an independent pistol supply. The Model 53 tested satisfactorily, but it was WWI economics and logistics considerations which doomed it for Navy procurement.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top