Actually, a committee chairman who wouldn't let the bill out otherwise but what I meant was I don't see that a pair of J-frame .38's is any more dangerous than a Glock with 17 rounds in the magazine.
Right, but I still call "Weasel" on committee chairmen, just like any other politician.
More unsolicited commentary: I am a CHL Instructor, and have been since 1995. I've taught defensive shooting since 1983. Here's what I tell my students: Comments like, "If I need more than (fill in the blank) shots, I'm not going to make it anyway," represent preparation to die, not to survive. If that's your attitude, why carry even one gun? Mindset is as important as shot placement, and might help avoid the necessity of placing a shot.
Carrying two guns, or even just a spare magazine or speedloader is not a "belt and suspenders" approach, but rather simple recognition that firearms are mechanical devices, mechanical devices fail, and we can't always predict when they will fail. For instance, several years ago, I reached in my vest pocket for a spare .45 mag. It was a high-quality magazine from a reputable manufacturer. Unnoticed by me, at some point the welds on the baseplate had failed, so I had a mag body, baseplate, follower, spring and loose .45 rounds in my pocket when I reached. The first big IPSC match I ever shot, I was using a 1911 that had never malfunctioned in over 3000 rounds fired. It jammed on a time-limited standard exercise. Mr. Murphy, welcome to the match!
Additionally, as Flop has pointed out, there are often tactical reasons for a spare gun that have nothing to do with having "enough" ammo or gun failure. And it's not that the concept of "enough ammo" should be ignored. Sometimes, even with well-placed shots, it takes a lot to stop an assailant. But, you guys do what you want; it's your lives, not mine.