Thorny subject

NFrameFred

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
3,637
Reaction score
4,693
Location
WV
I thought long and hard about this before posting, and please understand and let me say up front that I do not intend or wish for this to become a rancorous debate . . . and this not a "bashing" of the youth of today in general, since there are many upstanding kids and they are our only hope if the country is to survive.

But the general subject is the decline of standards of behavior in society - what is and is not acceptable and what we seem to willing to put up with or have forced on us.

I understand that as we age our views tend to "gel" and we become less accepting of lower standards than we grew up with. And it has always been the case that the younger generations push the limits and many times get the blame for the degradation. But instead of just acknowledging and accepting that this is the natural order of things, my question is just how far can we allow it to go ( or can it even be stopped?) before we cease to function as a free society ? Before things become so bad that all pretense of civility, manners, and decorum are discarded ?

The event that brought this into focus and the irony involved, coupled with the hypocrisy of the reactions is very telling.

The death of Ryan Dunn ("*******" "star") discussed here in another thread has brought this to the fore. Roger Ebert (film critic) made a flippant 'tweet' ( another sign of the apocalypse from my old timer's point of view) about how " friends don't let jackasses drive drunk" and has been pilloried for it for it being "unseemly". I grant you it was insensitive, but was it unseemly ? And by whose standards ?

Granted, it was in poor taste and had to be hurtful if you were the victim's wife, child, girlfriend, parent , or whatever. But let's be plain here - this was a man who gained his fame from disgusting vulgar behavior on national TV "pushing the boundaries" with acts on camera that would cause any sensible person to question his morals, upbringing and sanity. And he was paid well to do it. In other words, he got rich by being "unseemly".

Now, my personal feelings about that kind of "entertainment" aside, I find it ironic that Ebert is being pilloried for his "unseemly comment" from the very crowd that revels in, celebrates, and pays for the kind of degraded behavior made Dunn a "celebrity". The shoe is on the proverbial other foot and they are offended.

I guess my point is that a civilized society must have some standards that do not fall below a certain point or it will cease to be "civilized". By allowing this kind of "entertainment" to be brought into our children's living rooms, turning a blind eye toward it and ignoring it as a passing fad, or whatever, we contribute in some small part to the further degradation of a standard of behavior and civility that makes society work for everyone. I find it ironic and somewhat hypocritical that those who helped lower the bar now cry foul when it hits too close to them personally. From my vantage point, I say the monkey in the cage at the zoo that flings feces on the wall has no right to be offended if it splashes on him . . . .

Just personal observations - discuss or discard as you will . . . .
 
Register to hide this ad
Good post! I sure do have a very hard time figuring out why some celebrities are that.
Not that I have any use for celebrities any way.

Flipping channels looking for the History channel and saw something about a family, the Kardashians, what the heck is that all about and better yet why does anyone care.
 
True Freedom is based on principle.Today freedom based only on the individual and so many unprincipled people declare a freedom that is not freedom but licentiousness!These people then ignorantly and vocally proclaim their "freedom" to exclude all other individuals.This approaches anarchy not true,principled freedom.
 
I don't like morons and don't feel any compulsion to fake sadness when they kill themselves through their own stupidity. I especially have no sympathy for rich morons.

If you OD on drugs or get drunk and run into something with your car, you've just filtered the gene pool a little bit.
 
My sympathies to his and his passenger's families, my only other thought on this matter is, thank God he didn't take out some innocent driver or worse yet a family as he blasted down the road.
Steve W
 
Last edited:
Canceled the cable, the paper, don't watch much OTA TV, and yet I still don't feel left out. I'm actually happy that I don't even know what a "Kardashian" even is. We have the most connected and informed society there has even been and I bet half the people you ask wouldn't know the Vice President's name or what countries even have our soldiers in boots on ground. So am I surprised one bit that we have an ignorant, uninformed, spoiled, entitled, sue happy, don’t know how good they have it populace??? Nope.
 
I had never heard of the ******* program untill this guy got killed. Read about his stunts after that. Forget him and similar celebertys. The real people that dirty soceity is the producers and all involved of publishing this smut for money, and their fans that pay to watch it.
There is a large ungodly percentage of usualy young people that get off on this so called witty one man upmanship of trying to outdo each other with filthy talk etc, they will label friends and relatives with vile dirty nicknames and to them it`s speaking in terms of "endearment".
Just a day or two ago there was a thread here thats header was "this commercial thread got me thinking"
http://smith-wessonforum.com/lounge/197328-commercial-thread-got-me-thinking.html
It was about the hollywood squares and paul lynn. How "witty" those people are. I said my piece there. Hollywood plays to the low morals of people that think smut is cool. God isnt in any of these peoples life and other like people patronise them, makes them stars and rich. Im done.
 
The death of Ryan Dunn ("*******" "star") discussed here in another thread has brought this to the fore. Roger Ebert (film critic) made a flippant 'tweet' ( another sign of the apocalypse from my old timer's point of view) about how " friends don't let jackasses drive drunk" and has been pilloried for it for it being "unseemly". I grant you it was insensitive, but was it unseemly ? And by whose standards ?

I was taught, and I suspect many others were too, to not speak irreverently regarding the passing of others. To do otherwise would not be proper or appropriate = unseemly. I think that would be the applicable societal standard. That it's being applied by a bunch of Hollywood hypocrites doesn't surprise me. Nevertheless, I think the standard is a good one.

But the general subject is the decline of standards of behavior in society - what is and is not acceptable and what we seem to willing to put up with or have forced on us.

I understand that as we age our views tend to "gel" and we become less accepting of lower standards than we grew up with. And it has always been the case that the younger generations push the limits and many times get the blame for the degradation. But instead of just acknowledging and accepting that this is the natural order of things, my question is just how far can we allow it to go ( or can it even be stopped?) before we cease to function as a free society ? Before things become so bad that all pretense of civility, manners, and decorum are discarded ?


I haven't seen these JA movies, but my understanding is that they're akin to the Three Stooges with their pants down. I remember my grandmother (born in 1899) protesting my watching of the Three Stooges when I was a child. In those days there were no show ratings or parental programming tools on the TV to keep such shows out of the house as there are today. Was my grandmother worried that I'd go out and put someones head in a vice and crank the lever until their skull made a cracking sound, or was she worried that such programming would lead to even worse and eventually contribute to societal behavioral decline? I don't know. However, any worries she had about me mashing anyones head in a vice turned out to be unwarranted. As far as societal decline...

No doubt about it, the boundaries of speech and imagery continue to be pushed further and further out. Like you said, as I get older I tend to be less accepting of them... I preferred the boundaries where they were. ;) On the other hand, there's behaviors that our society largely accepted that I would not want to return to. For example-- In my grandmother's day, domestic violence was largely tolerated and turned a blind eye to by society. Specific to this topic, drunk driving was far more socially acceptable than it is today. I believe we are a far more civil society regarding how people treat those who are different (skirting around banned topic) both by law and in general societal standards/attitudes, than in my grandmother's time. So... some things are worse... some are better... I'm not so sure I would trade the societal standards of today, in total, for that of the past.

This Forum has strict behavior standards and seems to be growing pretty fast. Maybe that's a good sign.
 
Last edited:
I was taught, and I suspect many others were too, to not speak irreverently regarding the passing of others. To do otherwise would not be proper or appropriate = unseemly. I think that would be the applicable societal standard. That it's being applied by a bunch of Hollywood hypocrites doesn't surprise me. Nevertheless, I think the standard is a good one.




I haven't seen these JA movies, but my understanding is that they're akin to the Three Stooges with their pants down. I remember my grandmother (born in 1899) protesting my watching of the Three Stooges when I was a child. In those days there were no show ratings or parental programming tools on the TV to keep such shows out of the house as there are today. Was my grandmother worried that I'd go out and put someones head in a vice and crank the lever until their skull made a cracking sound, or was she worried that such programming would lead to even worse and eventually contribute to societal behavioral decline? I don't know. However, any worries she had about me mashing anyones head in a vice turned out to be unwarranted. As far as societal decline...

No doubt about it, the boundaries of speech and imagery continue to be pushed further and further out. Like you said, as I get older I tend to be less accepting of them... I preferred the boundaries where they were. ;) On the other hand, there's behaviors that our society largely accepted that I would not want to return to. For example-- In my grandmother's day, domestic violence was largely tolerated and turned a blind eye to by society. Specific to this topic, drunk driving was far more socially acceptable than it is today. I believe we are a far more civil society regarding how people treat those who are different (skirting around banned topic) both by law and in general societal standards, than in my grandmother's time. So... some things are worse... some are better... I'm not so sure I would trade the societal standards of today, in total, for that of the past.

This Forum has strict behavior standards and seems to be growing pretty fast. Maybe that's a good sign.

CP – Oh my. Part of me wants to tell you to at least find some video clips of these idiots and see what you are comparing the Three Stooges with here, but the honest side of me would slap myself for telling you to watch anything JA or any of the clones that JA started. And kids and even adults have been in news stories from time to time copying the stunts and actions of these idiots. This is the kind of stuff that makes me agree with foreigners that say we are a decadent society bloated on our freedoms. We are only steps away from the Romans at this point and none of these shows, producers, or supporters are deserving of being defended. You can compare the Three Stooges with Bugs Bunny, Wile E. Coyote, and Taz, but don’t for a minute think anything yet is on par with JA or any of the filth that followed them. Much like how marijuana is described as a gateway drug, JA opened the path for so much worse. You could even have made Evel Knievel one of the Three Stooges and you still wouldn’t be on the same field.
 
On my dads side of the family my grandparents were very religious. Besides that I understand grandpa was very tempermental and a extreamly strict man and was always getting into fights with anyone who dared cross him. He raised 16 kids (two familys, first wife died young) and all turned out okay.
My aunt told me she had never been to a movie and when snow white and the seven dwarfs came out she wanted to see it with some girl friends. Grandma knew grandpa wouldnt have permitted her and gave her money on the sly to see the movie.
Only one son got a divorice and he latter remairred his wife. None went to jail or ever got a nickle of welfare as far as I know. In todays world 16 siblings that get married from one family and never get divoriced would be a worlds record! I cant say the same for my 30+ cousins and myself though. I dont know how much laws restraining parents from whipping their kids play into the differance in todays world, but it has to be some factor. The absolute biggest factor in moral decline has got to be in the decline of all media, movies, tv, magazines etc. Freedom of speech I dont belive was to be interpited to permitting all hells sex deviates to infect the world! But that is exactly what we have!
 
And kids and even adults have been in news stories from time to time copying the stunts and actions of these idiots. This is the kind of stuff that makes me agree with foreigners that say we are a decadent society bloated on our freedoms. We are only steps away from the Romans at this point and none of these shows, producers, or supporters are deserving of being defended.

With 300,000,000 people in America you can find stories of people doing a great many things :D. I believe America has some serious issues to deal with. The huge shift in age demographics combined with social programs and mounting debt will be the strongest headwinds going forward. We've got a large portion of our society with an entitlement mentality that needs to be broken. IMO, the profane entertainment industry isn't a significant driver of any of these issues. It's not defending this type of entertainment, but rather my opinion that it doesn't merit a great deal of handwringing over.

As far as foreigners.... I understand there are lots of communists, socialists, Muslims and others around the globe who object to the freedoms and lifestyles in my country. My country isn't perfect, far from it, but I can't think of anywhere else I'd rather be, you?
 
On the other hand, there's behaviors that our society largely accepted that I would not want to return to. For example-- In my grandmother's day, domestic violence was largely tolerated and turned a blind eye to by society. Specific to this topic, drunk driving was far more socially acceptable than it is today.

I think you're comparing apples to oranges here. I believe the behaviors you're talking about were no more acceptable then than they are now. It's just that in that time period people were much more conscious of "minding their own business". Society as a whole decided that the line many were uncomfortable crossing (i.e. - inserting themselves into something between a husband and wife in the privacy of their home) was valid to be crossed and enacted laws to remedy the situation. I remember as a child in the 50's the adults having disdain and no use for a man in the neighborhood who treated his wife badly. It wasn't "acceptable" then, but the laws had not evolved to make it easy for the authorities to intervene.

As far as drunk driving, I think the same things apply. The laws are tougher, but they still don't solve the problem. As far as drunk driving being more "acceptable" in the past, I truly can't address that. I do know that folks then and now still do "buy" their way out of those scrapes. If you have money and good lawyer it seems you can continue to drink and drive - at least until you kill someone. Instances abound where people have had 5,6,7, or more DUI's and still continue to drive. I just think society as a whole is more determined to vilify the behavior now since the number of vehicles and drivers on the road far outpaces the scope of the 50's and 60's. I doubt they were "more accepting" of it 50 years ago, the scope of it wasn't as visible and large as it is today.


I believe we are a far more civil society regarding how people treat those who are different (skirting around banned topic) both by law and in general societal standards/attitudes, than in my grandmother's time. So... some things are worse... some are better... I'm not so sure I would trade the societal standards of today, in total, for that of the past.

Don't disagree, it's just that once the pendulum swings too far, it's hard if not impossible to recover the lost ground. There can be no doubt that the availability of crude, vulgar, anti-social material presented as "entertainment" is much more accessible today to those of impressionable age. Many believe and would say we've already past a dangerous point of no return in that regard.

And I respectfully ask that before you compare what these MTV "stars" do to the Three Stooges, you should personally take a look at it. Whoever made that comparison to you was, in my opinion, using a poor analogy.
 
Last edited:
With 300,000,000 people in America you can find stories of people doing a great many things :D. I believe America has some serious issues to deal with. The huge shift in age demographics combined with social programs and mounting debt will be the strongest headwinds going forward. We've got a large portion of our society with an entitlement mentality that needs to be broken. IMO, the profane entertainment industry isn't a significant driver of any of these issues. It's not defending this type of entertainment, but rather my opinion that it doesn't merit a great deal of handwringing over.

As far as foreigners.... I understand there are lots of communists, socialists, Muslims and others around the globe who object to the freedoms and lifestyles in my country. My country isn't perfect, far from it, but I can't think of anywhere else I'd rather be, you?

A - I guess it would be better to start thinking of it as a meter for just how messed up we are getting. There is just nothing like hearing preteen girls singing how their milkshake brings all the boys to the yard or how whips and chains excite them. This kind of thing is A-O.K. for the radio to go into young and impressionable minds. I just can't get used to that. But I think I aged from 29 to 59, so if I'm 32 now I don't know how old that really makes me feel. I'm way too young still to feel like such a cranky old man yelling at kids to turn down their radios... Stupid trunk rattling sub...

B - NO WAY (to the last part, of course) I have been all over in this world while I was on a FFG and can tell you hands down we have it darn good. But don't think I'm siding with anyone else but us... It's just sad to see how many people really don't know how good we have it, have no appreciation for those that got us here, and waste what we have... And there is just no convincing most of them there is anything different. But I guess that's part of the whole entitlement problem. Stopping now before I get a ticket. :(

So how about them Bears???

I hate it when threads can drag me down. I'm way too susceptible. (Focusing on the M65-5 on lay-a-way...) Happy!!!
 
Last edited:
Lets see ... we all know that Ely Whitney gave us the concept of interchangeable parts Edison the lightbulb and Tesla radio.... so who invented the inkjet printer, the smart phone, or the MP3?
if you cant gain your deserved fame doing right ... infamy may just have to do.
 
One of the ways I define myself as a Conservative is by quoting the one conservative commentator who said "I do not believe in the liberal concept of a no-fault society." If people engage in foolish or stupid-and illegal and immoral behavior, they and they alone can live with the consequences and they have no one to blame but themselves and deserve neither sympathy nor understanding. I have read of several cases were murdered gangsters were denied Roman Catholic funeral masses, etc., in the one case the presiding bishop said that someone who has not lived by the Church's teachings in life will not receive the Church's blessing at death.
And I like the observation I have picked from the Web:
"No man is completely useless-he can always serve as a bad example."
 
I have to agree with the OP - it seems things are getting more and more uncivil these days. And as a certified curmudgeon, I've been know to espouse exactly the same viewpoint from time to time here and elsewhere.

But as I think back on my (more) youthful days, I remember instances where my own behavior was regarded as uncivil, unseemly, insensitive, roguish, dangerous, testosterone-laden, careless, and dumb-assed. People (and particularly males) in the age range of 15 to about 35 or so have a knack for these things. You think you're indestructible, and you think that the things you do only affect yourself.

And then, slowly, but inevitably, you learn that you are wrong on both of the above counts. Luckily, wild men will often hook up with a good woman who will tame them, and wild women sometimes find a good man who will make them want to deserve him and his expectations. These things have a way of working out in time.

Good parenting moderates these behaviors, and the older you get the more you realize how smart your parents really were.

The bell-shaped curve applies at every age. A few cannot be helped, and a few are true gems. In the middle are the great majority, who, while not perfect, eventually strive to be civil and worthy. I think that's the best than can be hoped for.

John
 
Last edited:
When I graduated from high school in 1958, central wisconsin, there wasnt one case of drugs in our school yet. I didnt know of one person that had claimed to haveing tried one drug. We did have some that bragged on drinking. I never seen one example of grafitti untill much later. Coincidently, the public school of 500 was 100% white.
Today theresa and I took a drive. Someone was standing in for hannity on the radio. He was talking about how the top 10% of the wealthy people in the country pay 67% of all taxs. Some ungodly young moron called in crying that the wealthy in this country should pay all the taxs in the country because they have all the money. You dont need to guess which party he votes for!
I know what formed my idea`s. Godly parents, forced church attendance, (I wasnt wild about it), and working in the fields for next to nothing.
Another thing that bugs me, and we have had other threads here before argueing the point, is seat belt and helmit laws. Now I admit, most of the time a person is foolish if they dont wear seat belts or wear a helmit on a motorcycle. Yet I find it ironic people that claim they will die for my right of freedom of speech will write me a ticket if I choose to gamble and take a chance on my own life and comfort. (By the way I do buy my own insurance.) We have the loose liberal laws where heathens are free to polute the envirement with their mouth and docturne yet God isnt to be mentioned in school?
What right does a student have that hasnt yet paid a cent in taxs have in protesting and rioting about what a school teachs? That right should be reserved for the working, property tax paying parents.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top