How about the Georgia Court of Appeals? Is that enough documentation for you?
Caselaw on GeorgiaPacking.org, THE STATE v. JONES, 289 Ga. App. 176 (2008)
Caselaw on GeorgiaPacking.org, THE STATE v. JONES, 289 Ga. App. 176 (2008)
And it was NOPD "internal affairs" that dealt with the problem, right? Not so much... and not so much in any of the other incidents I listed....still waiting for all those "documented" cases...I thought we were talking about being subjected to rudeness regarding CCW permits. Don't know about the other stuff you mentioned, but the cops in New Orleans are being tried for murder.
What about carrying per LEOSA, I feel like a jerk producing my retired ID. In years past I carrried a pistol in the glove compartment, when asked or the registration I then informed the officer that I have a gun in the glove compartment with the registration. Twice this has happened, twice they asked for a permit and I produced my retired Id card. Twice I didn't get a ticket I deserved. That isnt right, I don't mind telling the officer I have a gun, but I don't want any special treatment.
Not cool at all.
So then similarly, wouldn't it follow that badges mean absolutely nothing when you're BEING stopped?CCWs mean absolutely nothing when conducting a stop; YOU know you're OK; the cop doesn't.
So then similarly, wouldn't it follow that badges mean absolutely nothing when you're BEING stopped?
When I'm stopped by a cop, I may or may not have ANY idea why. I certainly have NO idea IN THE WORLD who he is, or what his record is. If the cop shouldn't trust somebody who's passed a background investigation to get a CHL, there's certainly no reason for me to trust a cop who's passed a background examination to get a badge. He could be a good guy or he could be Justin Volpe. Therefore, I shouldn't talk to him in any way not specifically mandated by law, right? And consenting to any search would be utterly out of the question, right?
Every argument that you can make for why a cop shouldn't trust a citizen with a CHL during a stop is 100% equally applicable to why a citizen with a CHL shouldn't trust a cop during a stop.
Flat out untrue.1. Drive safely and stay within the speed limit. You won't get stopped.
I was "trolling" for the Lakeshore Limited.3. Don't be trolling for whores or dope while CCW (like the goofball in the other thread).
If the law doesn't REQUIRE me to notify, there'd better NOT be.4. If stopped, be polite and follow instructions. If you don't want to tell the cop you have a gun, don't. There may be a price to pay, though.
The kind of "satisfaction" that the family of Michael Pleasance got?5. If you're not satisfied with your treatment, complain to the Agency involved, not the Internet. If the cop screwed up you'll probably get some satisfaction.
Stop "whining" about "officer safety". If you can't feel "safe" without breaking the law, change careers.6. Stop whining. If it didn't happen to you, so what?
That argument goes the other way as well. How come so many police have a problem with civilians?cmort666, your post says it all. Nothing I say will change your views. Obviously, you have a problem with cops. No sweat, most everyone I dealt with did. As far as the career change goes, I did. Retired and went back in the Army. Prepping for my 3rd combat tour. Hope you come to grips with your anger issues.
Bob
I think your comment, "It didn't happen to you, so what?" pretty much sums things up. That doesn't really strike me as a productive attitude in a cop.cmort666, your post says it all. Nothing I say will change your views. Obviously, you have a problem with cops. No sweat, most everyone I dealt with did. As far as the career change goes, I did. Retired and went back in the Army. Prepping for my 3rd combat tour. Hope you come to grips with your anger issues.
Bob
Isolated incidents can happen anywhere.Wow, I'm sure glad I live where I do. The cops respect us, and we respect the cops, pretty simple.
I don't see what the cops did wrong on the long-winded Chastain Lakes encounter...the cop's perception was that something was wrong, so he called for another unit.
I would consider it troubling for somebody with no duty to protect anyone as an individual, forcibly (and unlawfully) preventing someone from being able to defend himself.You mean when they disarmed a legally armed citizen, separated his ammo from his guns, and told him if he stopped to load his weapons they would take him to jail?
That tells me a lot.