I guess this shouldn't make me ill but for some reason it does. You've been looking for a certain pistol/revolver and someone has it for sale. You pm them about a question and next thing you know, someone who's made their first post snags it with an "I'll Take It". Sort of chaps my rear end.
1St Post..."I'll Take It"
- Thread starter ColColt
- Start date
Register to hide this ad
Hope you put in a 2nd request should the first one fall through.
HAWKEYE10
Member
Ever tried Preparation H? It works for me. 
Dongregintenn
Member
Like my ole pappy says: Ya snooze, ya loose. Better luck next time.
geoff40
Member
When I've sold guns via the internet, I've always had an unspoken rule that if someone opens a line of communications on a gun with me, by emailing or sending a PM, then they in effect are like the customer in a gun shop who is looking at a gun. The next guy can have it when the first one passes on it. It has happened that way a couple of times, and I think it is the only fair way to go about it.
If I owned a gun shop, I would never pull a gun from a customer's hands ( I have had that done to me btw), who was looking at it, just because the next guy to come along says he wants it. The internet shouldn't be any different.
If I owned a gun shop, I would never pull a gun from a customer's hands ( I have had that done to me btw), who was looking at it, just because the next guy to come along says he wants it. The internet shouldn't be any different.
Garland
Member
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2010
- Messages
- 159
- Reaction score
- 98
That's a good way to put it, and contrary to my thinking which has been "I'll take it!" trumps "PM sent" or anything else. I don't know that my thinking will change, but your opinion helps me to see the other side of the argument anyway.
Nope, that burns. Gold Bond works better for my tender skin.
Sure, and understandable per the rules. However, it's the guys that haunt the gun forums for the sole purpose of snatching up a deal that bugs me without any rapport with others in the forum on topics or posting any worthwhile threads themselves. They're purpose is to buy here, sell for a profit elsewhere. I think you should have a certain amount of posts before you can sell/buy items. Just my opinion-nothing more.
mc5aw
Member
It might be worth discussing with Lee if, as a seller with an established post count, a forum member could state in a "for sale" advert that individuals with less than X post counts must contact seller before an "I'll take it" is posted. It's done all the time on 'Bay to protect sellers from inexperienced/phony/know nothing bidders.
sipowicz
Member
I agree...the second person to respond should always get the item!
spirit4earth
Member
I had contacted a seller on here, and we'd made arrangements for PayPal and the sale was pretty much a done deal. I had also posted a "pm sent" on the thread. But because I don't use the exact words "I'll take it", someone else got the purchase, even though the seller and I had wrapped it up. Seems like the buyer and seller should be able to work out a deal, rather than having to use specific language.
I tried asking for something like that. I do not even use the classifieds that much if at all. Many forums have a minimum post count before a member can access the classifieds. Of course a new member can just make some useless posts to build up to the magic number so that was the logic behind not doing it. I would still rather see 25 useless posts and you would have an idea of who you are potentially dealing with. JMO
BCDWYO
Member
I agree it can be frustrating. I happened along a beautiful CS1 not too long ago on this forum. The seller did not post pictures but rather said e-mail for pictures. I posted "I'll take it pending looking at pics" and e-mailed him. When I came back to the computer a few minutes later, someone had posted an more definite "I'll take it", and it was already sold to him. I was pretty irritated that the pics couldn't have been posted on the forum or a link. (pics were lovely by the way...oh well).
handejector
Staff member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2005
- Messages
- 26,134
- Reaction score
- 47,054
laissez faire
I believe in a free market.
Sellers set their terms.
If you need for me to set the terms, we need to talk about my commission.
See my ALL posts here-
Sticky: NOTE about "I'll Take It"
g_conway
US Veteran
Why would anyone expect "I'm interested, I have questions, or would you take ????" to trump "I'll take it."
Just like any other form of sale, the first person to say i'll take it, at the offered price, gets it. I have always updated my post with "SOLD Pending funds" to let people know the status of the sale.
I have no problems negotiating on price or shipping, or answering questions, but I'm not going to lose a sale over it.
Just like any other form of sale, the first person to say i'll take it, at the offered price, gets it. I have always updated my post with "SOLD Pending funds" to let people know the status of the sale.
I have no problems negotiating on price or shipping, or answering questions, but I'm not going to lose a sale over it.
pinduck
US Veteran
g conway nailed it,while some one is dithering with can you do this or that, if one can decide and says "I'll take it" he/she wins the prize. I don't see anything wrong with that approach. I have sent pics, answered questions and then never heard another word from the party asking, maybe he had forgot to check with the wife, girlfriend or what ever but see no reason to give him priority over a firm "I'll take it".
I'm not going to buy an item without at least seeing a few pics of what I'm getting. Some don't post pictures at all but indicate they'll send them pending your email address, etc. That gives someone else who's gambling and has no idea what it looks like to hit the "I'll Take It" button to bump you out of the deal. That's just not right in my book.
I've had it both ways. Had guns sold to someone else when i was
the first "I'll take it". And i've also been the first "i'll take it" after
2 or 3 guys ahead of me just PM'ing the seller. Does'nt matter to
me one way or the other. But if Lee or the seller says first "I'll
take it" wins the item then everybody, sellers and buyers, should
respect and abide by those rules. I would just like to see some
consistency to the rules across the board.
Chuck
the first "I'll take it". And i've also been the first "i'll take it" after
2 or 3 guys ahead of me just PM'ing the seller. Does'nt matter to
me one way or the other. But if Lee or the seller says first "I'll
take it" wins the item then everybody, sellers and buyers, should
respect and abide by those rules. I would just like to see some
consistency to the rules across the board.
Chuck
I agree.I tried to buy an item and the seller posted crummy pictures ( I know he posted professional pics before) I asked for better pictures and some more details on the item. This seemed to be too much to ask so he basically ignored me and stated I asked to many questions. Sorry I am not sending x amount of dollars to some unknown person without some clear idea of what the item looks like.
Arik
Member
Who says theyre out to buy and flip for a profit? You know how many times ive searched for a specific gun online only to find the "for sale" ones on boards like this? No stores carried them, no one. So should i have made a hundred or so posts just to buy it if it was still available? And If im the seller your money is just as green as the guy with 0 posts.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
