Early Bekearts - What is (and isn't) Known

Goony

Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2009
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
2,940
Location
Arizona
Pictured below is an example of the ultimate in "Bekeartness" in a .22/.32 Hand Ejector, being that it's from the inaugural batch made in 1911 and also one of those actually shipped to the Phil. B. Bekeart Co. in San Francisco.

A fresh examination of Smith & Wesson records has revealed that a previous and supposedly authoritative list of the original .22/.32's consigned to the Phil. B. Bekeart Co. had mistakenly included a handful of serial numbers that actually went elsewhere, an error compounded by also omitting a few more than that which could in fact be documented as being delivered to Bekeart.

It has now been definitively established that of the 1,044 made in that initial 1911 production run (serial numbers 138226 through 139275), 294 were actually received by Bekeart in that same year. There were six separate shipments, four in June, the first of these numbering 30, and then in quick succession three more of 60 each, another in August of 50 more, with a final group of 34 going out in October.

There are still some unresolved questions surrounding these earliest .22/.32's. The total quantity logged does not quite match up with what the serial number range implies, with six serial numbers being unaccounted for. This discrepancy could be due to their not being completed and possibly scrapped, or perhaps those six numbers ended up being ordinary .32 caliber Hand Ejectors. Maybe it just reflects a bookkeeping lapse. But all that's conjecture.

Another curiosity is that the left stock of each revolver had a number stamped on its bottom, starting at "1". The progression of these stock numbers only roughly corresponds with the serial number sequence, so it's not possible to deduce what stock number ought to be associated with any particular serial number. It certainly wasn't a normal Smith & Wesson procedure to apply these additional numbers, and one can't help but wonder if it was especially done at Bekeart's behest. That the practice continued for some subsequent production of the model, however, tends to undermine that argument.

A last mystery would be how many of the 1,044 and/or the 294 are extant. This likely will never be known with any certainty, although someone may be able to make a statistical case for a certain percentage of them surviving.
 

Attachments

  • numbered stock.jpg
    numbered stock.jpg
    56 KB · Views: 301
Register to hide this ad
hi
Here are pictures of the 22/32 Bekeart First Shipment and a Orginal Box from the first shipment. The Grip number on this one is 294
Jim

bmg60-albums-transition-kit-gun-4-inch-red-box-picture7243-bekeart-1st-model-final-rev1.jpg


bmg60-albums-transition-kit-gun-4-inch-red-box-picture7244-bekeart-box-rev-1.jpg


Here are 4 of the 22/32 Bekeart models two are original shipment.

bmg60-albums-transition-kit-gun-4-inch-red-box-picture7245-4-22-32-bekeart-models.jpg
 
Last edited:
One thing to be gleaned from the label on that box is that the "Heavy Frame" nomenclature was evidently utilized from the very beginning, which I hadn't realized.
 
This is very interesting data! I have three 22/32's but only 1 of them is early, serial 138727 with grip number 369. It was shipped to Hibbard, Spencer ...etc... in Chicago on 7 July 1911. (Jinks letter from 1994) It is in reasonable condition but has one or two small spots of pitting from storage issues i would guess.
 
Last edited:
One thing to be gleaned from the label on that box is that the "Heavy Frame" nomenclature was evidently utilized from the very beginning, which I hadn't realized.

Great thread Goony!

There's a 'Phil B. Bekeart Co.' April 1912 ad posted in a thread that jives with your box label referring to it as a 'Heavy Frame'. The Target Revolver is in smaller font. Also interesting that it's referred to as the Model 1911 in the ad. IIRC they became the 'Heavy Frame Target' in 1915 when introduced as a regular catalog item.

Another realization to me is that apparently, the end label was damaged the first time the box was open unless someone had the foresight to slice it with a knife. Probably everone already knew that but me.

My earliest gun with one of the few boxes I have is a 1913 vintage 32 Hand Ejector. The end label is completely on the bottom half of the box.

Thanks for the edjacashun Goony and for sharing those facts and great pics.
 
Last edited:
One interesting factoid that came from the research into the "Bekeart" .22/32 HFT's that was conducted with the tremendous assistance of our fearless leader Mr. Roy Jinks is that the originally published total of guns shipped to Bekeart was 292, not 294 as has been now correctly determined. The first 6 shipments were for 30, 60, 60 ,60, 50 and 34. There are additional guns shipped to Bekeart after these initial 6 shipments but the purist considers the first 294 to be the "true Bekearts".

Sorry Jim, but you need to redo a bunch of your labels.:(

PS: and to take it one step further in the world of Bekeartness, the first 6 shipments to Bekeart were on June 7, June 22, June 28, June 30, August 31 and October 13. So actually a real "first" shipment gun would have had to be in the June 7 shipment of 30 pieces.
 
Last edited:
The grip numbers of the 1st 294 shipped would be very interesting. Jim's # 294, in the 4th June shipment, not surprisingly shows they were not shipped in grip numerical order. And we already know Smiths were almost never shipped in serial numerical order.

And yes, one from the 1st June shipment would be the pinnacle of Bekeartness!
 
The grip numbers of the 1st 294 shipped would be very interesting. Jim's # 294, in the 4th June shipment, not surprisingly shows they were not shipped in grip numerical order. And we already know Smiths were almost never shipped in serial numerical order.

Well, as I calculate, by serial number Jim's gun would've been the 314th, so the 294 grip number clearly is not in direct correrelation.

As to the serial numbers in each of the six shipments to Bekeart, in every instance, the lowest number of the succeeding shipment is below the highest number of the preceding one; in other words, in each case there's serial number overlap. The most striking example of this involves the last two shipments - the highest number of the August 31 shipment is 139248, while the lowest number of the October 13 shipment is 138265, or almost a thousand earlier in the serial number sequence!
 
Excellent thread Goony! Yours, grip #1016, is certainly in excellent shape, especially being one of the ultimate very 1st 30 shipped.

The 1st 100 Colt SAAs produced according to serial #s (not 1st shipped necessarily) had a few early features like the 'pinched frame' rear sight as an example. Makes me wonder if some of the lowest #'d Bekearts exhibit any similar quirks that were changed/improved early on as S&W got into full production.

Do you know of any? Other than the changes common to all Smith models; stock medallions, extractor knob, 'Made in USA' rollmark etc.

One we've observed is the standard front bead sight changed to a Patridge but that was over 10 years later.
 
Excellent thread Goony! Yours, grip #1016, is certainly in excellent shape, especially being one of the ultimate very 1st 30 shipped.

The 1st 100 Colt SAAs produced according to serial #s (not 1st shipped necessarily) had a few early features like the 'pinched frame' rear sight as an example. Makes me wonder if some of the lowest #'d Bekearts exhibit any similar quirks that were changed/improved early on as S&W got into full production.

Do you know of any? Other than the changes common to all Smith models; stock medallions, extractor knob, 'Made in USA' rollmark etc.

One we've observed is the standard front bead sight changed to a Patridge but that was over 10 years later.

My gun actually was in the October 13 (final) shipment to Bekeart in 1911. I wouldn't think there'd be any premium on which of the six shipments a partcular gun was in, as long as it was one of the 294.

As to your question, I don't believe there are any discernable production variations within that first batch of 1,044.
 
Last edited:
Questions:
1. Were the numbers stamped on the grip by Bekeart or by Smith and Wesson?
2. Were the box stickers applied by Bekeart or at the factory by Smith and Wesson?

Great thread and very educational.
 
Questions:
1. Were the numbers stamped on the grip by Bekeart or by Smith and Wesson?
2. Were the box stickers applied by Bekeart or at the factory by Smith and Wesson?

The grips were definitely numbered by Smith & Wesson. All of the first production run, whether shipped to Bekeart or not, have them.

As to the label, I've not seen the box for any non-Bekeart shipped gun to compare. It certainly wouldn't have been out of the question for Bekeart to have his own self-promotional labels printed up to supplant the factory ones. It is interesting that the label on Jim's box states, "Manufactured for and for sale only by Phil. B. Bekeart Co." If that's a factory label, it clearly indicates S&W's expectation that Bekeart was to take the entire initial batch. If it's a Bekeart commissioned replacement, well, it turned out to be a bit short of what came to pass.
 
hi
I have only seen One more box like mine and it had the same label.
I think the factory put the labels on when they shipped the guns to Bekeart.
Jim
In Roys letter for my gun he said at the end of the letter A really great gun and a greater box.
Jim
 
hi
I have only seen One more box like mine and it had the same label.
I think the factory put the labels on when they shipped the guns to Bekeart.
Jim

Was the other box you saw associated with a specifc serial number? If the "Bekeart" labels were factory applied, the question also could be asked whether there was one label used for those guns actually shipped to Bekeart and another "non-Bekeart" label used for the others. But if all the labels that left the factory were the "Bekeart" type, I'd expect to sooner or later see a box with a label that had that "advertising" cut out or otherwise redacted.
 
Last edited:
Hi
It was about 4 years ago and it was on a auction with out a revolver and I did not get the serial number.
jim
Sorry.
jim
 
I just received my latest 22/32 HFT and it bears serial number 138289. The left stock panel has the number 289 stamped into it and just happens to be the last 3 digits of the serial number. Probably just a coincidence, but neat none the less.

I will try to get pictures up later tonight when I get home with the camera.

Roy indicated that the stock number indicates the number of the place in sequence that the gun was assembled. Or in other words, my gun was the 289th gun assembled. It is the second gun numerically by serial number in the 4th Bekeart shipment so it is evident as with most things S&W, there was no rhyme or reason as to how things were shipped by S&W.
 
I just received my latest 22/32 HFT and it bears serial number 138289. The left stock panel has the number 289 stamped into it and just happens to be the last 3 digits of the serial number. Probably just a coincidence, but neat none the less.

Roy indicated that the stock number indicates the number of the place in sequence that the gun was assembled. Or in other words, my gun was the 289th gun assembled.

By serial number though, it's merely the 65th gun. That's a pretty big discrepancy.
 
.... the first 6 shipments to Bekeart were on June 7, June 22, June 28, June 30, August 31 and October 13. So actually a real "first" shipment gun would have had to be in the June 7 shipment of 30 pieces.

Very interesting posts,
Interesting how no shipments went to PB in July,
I noticed there is a July 1911 gun posted above that did not ship to PB and my .22/32 Heavy Frame Target serial number 138437 (grip # 567) also shipped in July 1911 and also did not go to PB .
 
...my .22/32 Heavy Frame Target serial number 138437 (grip # 567)...

By serial number, the 212th gun. Another large variance from the number on the stock. The correlation between the two would seem to be even more tenuous than imagined.
 
I have been asked to post the following info. by a member who is a serious student of the Bekeart .22-32. Target models, so for the benefit of the membership, here goes: " The initial order to the Floor Foreman for production of the .22-32 Targets ( in the .32 HE series ) was for 1050 guns. Serial numbers 138226 through 139275. All in blue, no skipped numbers. 138226 was made April 25, 1911 and 139275 on July 10, 1911." Various sources have reported 1,000 guns, 1044 guns, etc. I don't dispute those numbers as they were based on information available at the time, however I believe the best information is the actual daily production records of the Floor Foreman responsible for making the guns, that lists them by dates and serial number and the total is 1050 guns, I'm going with that. That's my story, and I'm sticking to it! Ed.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top