Feinstein Gun Control Bill to Exempt Government Officials

Register to hide this ad
Just saw this. NOT GOOD. Every country that has enacted gun control that takes guns from the law abiding and arms the government, has seen mass executions of its citizens. Hitler comes to mind first. Call me paranoid, but these folks are getting scary....

Here's something that I've kept...
Well, let's look at the gun control record shall we?
"In 1929, the
Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million
dissidents were rounded up and exterminated.
"In 1911,
Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians
were rounded up and exterminated.
"Germany
established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews and
others were rounded up and exterminated. (see
Footnote)
"China
established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political
dissidents were rounded up and exterminated.
"Guatemala
established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians
were rounded up and exterminated.
"Uganda
established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians
were rounded up and exterminated.
"Cambodia
established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million 'educated'
people were rounded up and exterminated."
Defenseless
people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control:
56 million.
Source: http://www.kc3(dot)com/editorial/gun_control_works.htm
 
Last edited:
Is it possible that "government official" refers to police and military, and not ranking politicians, as the article implies in an attempt to inflame. The law has enough flaws without being misrepresented.
 
Gee, imagine that, she forgot to include that fact in her own summary...:eek:

Can't imagine why she would omit that little tidbit..

We could just take the Pelosi approach...

We must pass the bill to see whats in it....
 
Is it possible that "government official" refers to police and military, and not ranking politicians, as the article implies in an attempt to inflame. The law has enough flaws without being misrepresented.

I highly doubt it. Since when is the military considered government officials and police. Local police have nothing to do with the government.
 
Not to offend anyone, but the bill excludes retired police officers. Why? As a retired military officer and combat vet, I probably have as much firearms experience as the usual retired LEO, I also may have heard and reacted to more shots fired in anger than the average retired LEO. I also qualified for and held national security clearances that far exceeded anything the average LEO has. So, why are retired military excluded? Are we less trustyworthy, less experienced in firearm safety and usage?
 
Does anyone know where to read the bill in its entirety? All I can find is her summary.

On Feinstein's website, the summary text includes

"The legislation excludes the following weapons from the bill:

Any weapon that is lawfully possessed at the date of the bill's enactment;

Any firearm manually operated by a bolt, pump, lever or slide action;

Assault weapons used by military, law enforcement, and retired law enforcement; and

Antique weapons."

Her summary does not mention "Government Official". I'm just wondering where it is mentioned in the summary. I'm more worried about what's in the actual bill vs her summary!

Found this: Dianne Feinstein Gun Bill: Text, List Of Guns Banned And Details Of 'The Assault Weapons Ban of 2013'

Note this little item to make sure your M&P is included:

All semiautomatic pistols that can accept a detachable magazine and have at least one military feature: threaded barrel; second pistol grip; barrel shroud; capacity to accept a detachable magazine at some location outside of the pistol grip; or semiautomatic version of an automatic firearm.
 
So, why are retired military excluded? Are we less trustyworthy, less experienced in firearm safety and usage?

Former/current military are viewed as heroes by normal thinking people. To the radical elitists running our government, you are most likely viewed as a threat to their plans of "change". As a group, the majority of retired military are probably pretty conservative, especially the former trigger pullers. That makes you high on the leftest list to be disarmed. Make no mistake about that. Its a sad state of affairs.

We all need to get involved and use everything we can muster to change Congress in 2014!!!
 
Last edited:
Exempting anyone is a "divide and conquer" tactic.
In a sense, they have exempted me, as I only have revolvers.
They will target me later when they extend the ban to all "repeating arms". "They" accomplish their agenda one step at a time, but it is a ratcheted step. "Click"! "They" seldom experience a "set back", once a step has been "locked in". "Click"! Next step. "Click"!
"They" can be very patient, when it is necessary.

Best,
Rick
 
Exempting anyone is a "divide and conquer" tactic.
In a sense, they have exempted me, as I only have revolvers.
They will target me later when they extend the ban to all "repeating arms". "They" accomplish their agenda one step at a time, but it is a ratcheted step. "Click"! "They" seldom experience a "set back", once a step has been "locked in". "Click"! Next step. "Click"!
"They" can be very patient, when it is necessary.

Best,
Rick

True my friend!!!!!!
 
Reply to Thread

Former/current military are viewed as heroes by normal thinking people. To the radical elitists running our government, you are most likely viewed as a threat to their plans of "change". As a group, the majority of retired military are probably pretty conservative, especially the former trigger pullers. That makes you high on the leftest list to be disarmed. Make no mistake about that. Its a sad state of affairs.

We all need to get involved and use everything we can muster to change Congress in 2014!!!

Why Not Change It In 2013!!!!:mad:
 
Just saw this. NOT GOOD. Every country that has enacted gun control that takes guns from the law abiding and arms the government, has seen mass executions of its citizens. Hitler comes to mind first. Call me paranoid, but these folks are getting scary....

Here's something that I've kept...
Well, let's look at the gun control record shall we?
"In 1929, the
Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million
dissidents were rounded up and exterminated.
"In 1911,
Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians
were rounded up and exterminated.
"Germany
established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews and
others were rounded up and exterminated. (see
Footnote)
"China
established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political
dissidents were rounded up and exterminated.
"Guatemala
established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians
were rounded up and exterminated.
"Uganda
established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians
were rounded up and exterminated.
"Cambodia
established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million 'educated'
people were rounded up and exterminated."
Defenseless
people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control:
56 million.
Source: http://www.kc3(dot)com/editorial/gun_control_works.htm

Not everywhere (England and Australia) but dang close and their citizens are helpless against those with guns (criminals)

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
 
Not everywhere (England and Australia) but dang close and their citizens are helpless against those with guns (criminals)

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2

Google murder rate before/after guns in the UK. The rate of murder by guns goes down dramtically as expected. BUT the overall murder rate stays the same - so they're gonna kill you regardless. Control of guns has no effect on the rate; only the method. This however does not advance their agenda so you never hear it.
 
If this is true, and I intend to post a link to the full text of her legislation once it becomes available on THOMAS, I suppose we shouldn't be surprised by the double standard considering that she saw fit to obtain a licence for a concealed handgun since, in her eyes, such a lofty responsibility can only be entrusted to those of her rank and station.

As an aside, I once saw a movie where only the armed forces and police were allowed to have "military style" weapons... It was called Schindler's List, if memory serves correctly.
 
We could not trust her in an outhouse with a muzzle own. She wants to make sure that all of her subjects can be kept in line.
Remember they want all of our guns . Don't let all the smoke they are blowing blind you this is round one if it is not a knock out punch throw-ed by us.
Never never give up and let them know that we will teach our children to teach their children to resist.
 
I would ask all on this forum who are in a position to do so to go to the NRA website and make an emergency donation to NRA-ILA. I did so after reading a summary of Feinstein's proposal. Thanks.
 
Found this: Dianne Feinstein Gun Bill: Text, List Of Guns Banned And Details Of 'The Assault Weapons Ban of 2013'

Note this little item to make sure your M&P is included:

All semiautomatic pistols that can accept a detachable magazine and have at least one military feature: threaded barrel; second pistol grip; barrel shroud; capacity to accept a detachable magazine at some location outside of the pistol grip; or semiautomatic version of an automatic firearm.

A few items of note from that link:

Eliminating the 10-year sunset that allowed the original federal ban to expire.

Prohibiting the sale or transfer of large-capacity ammunition feeding devices lawfully possessed on the date of enactment of the bill.
 
Back
Top