Lee:
Great gun, photos and narrative! Thanks for sharing.
Great gun, photos and narrative! Thanks for sharing.
Granted.![]()
JIm
This is worse than some of the Colt serial numbering !
I was just using Lee's numbers, and I don't really worry about whether they are disputed.
I'm really wondering if he agrees that there ought to be a 2nd model 455 with the
same serial number as his gun. That would be a rare pair !
Regards, Mike
In the SUMMER of 1914, the Brits had asked S&W if they could build .455 revolvers. S&W built a .455 TL and sent it to them.Lee,
Does this then negate the shipping date for the 1st 33 .455 TLs of April 8th, 1912 or is that a typo in Neal and Jinks?
Also, if one has a gun with one of the 63 duplicated #s in the first 666 .44 1st Model 455s, is there any way to know if they have a .44 1st Model .455 or .455 1st Model? Both guns are .455 TLs!
Conceivably Roy Jinks can give you two different shipping dates for each of those 63 duplicated serial numbers. So the shipping dates are not helpful. That would be an interesting letter.
1. .44 HE 1st Model TL, .455 Mk II chambering (808 factory reconfigured unsold ".44 Spl HE 1st Models" or from parts thereof, original chamberings unknown [666 for the British, the rest for the US commercial market]). These 808 .455 #s range from 1104 to 10417 within the .44 1st Model serial # range of 1 to 15375. Shipped 1914-16.
Mike, that should all be correct.Lee
To make sure I have this straight -
There is a total of 666 plus 5000+ plus 691 triplelocks in 455 caliber.
That first 666 are in the 44 series. The next 5000+ are in the 455 serial
number series. The final 691 are back in the 44 series.
The gun you have, because its a triplelock, is one of the last 691 made in the 44 series.
Is all this correct so far ?
If so, then there must be another gun in the 455 series with this same serial number,
but is a second model .
Would that be right ?
Regards, Mike Priwer