- Joined
- Feb 29, 2000
- Messages
- 2,297
- Reaction score
- 2,483
I'm a LEO instructor and my students have the weirdest ideas on the "Need" for automatics.
#1 High capacity
Fact is that most lethal confrontations happen in 2.2 rounds, coincidentally the same number of children (at least was) in the American family
#2 Shoot faster.
The facts are that the revolver is clearly faster, Ed McGivern proved that L-O-N-G ago.
#3 You NEED the higher capacity
Well, I've never shot anyone but I don't think I'll die because I reload my times 8 one time during a firefight or 32 round IPSC or IDPA match
Just the opposite may be true. When a fellow officer is out of his 15 round mags I may be the only one left with ammo... I carry spare speedloaders I wouldn't call that under gunned in a SHF ( **** hits the fan) confrontation.
FACT is, the AVERAGE Jane/Joe CAN shoot an auto faster. But who cares?
The main benefit is a SHORTER-LIGHTER trigger pull than the average K-frame. All else being equal, such a trigger is easier to shoot, right?
I laught at the 2-3rds per gunfight 'stat' that is bandied about from time to time. Odds on, you'll never be IN a gunfight. The mere fact that you ARE means the odds have crapped on you. Extra rounds WITHOUT HAVING TO RELOAD, can be a lifesaver. Why? What's the next most difficult skill to master with a revoler behind the DA trigger?
