In the S&W department, I have a few I consider good buys but the best is probably a 2-1/2" Model 66-4 I bought on GunBroker four or five years ago. The seller described it as being in "average" condition and had posted a minimum bid of $416. This was of course during the current snub-nose craze and while not a fan of those guns, I watched the auction to see how crazy high the gun would go.
It looked more "like-new" than "average" in the photos, one of which is above, so after several days with no bids, I placed the minimum bid just to help the seller out by getting things rolling. Three days later, there were no other bids and I was the proud owner. The gun truly is "like-new" and looks good wearing Combats in this photo with its Model 66-2 kin.
My other "best buy" is a Remington Model 700VTR. The VTR is that goofy looking "
varmint/
tactical
rifle" with a triangular barrel. A young man won one in a gun raffle but was only interested in shotguns so he posted it for sale on trapshooters.com for $450. A friend of mine had paid over $600 and waited three months for one just like it - a .223 with an integral muzzle brake and the Desert camo synthetic stock, so I bought it with intentions of turning it for a few bucks profit.
After it sat in my safe for a few months, I decide to shoot it. I mounted a 4-12x 40mm A.O. Leupold VX-2 scope with their target dot reticle and did some handload development for it. Long story short, here's how it shoots at 100 yards with nothing done to it but replacing the trigger group with a Timney.
Another Remington is a Model 700VLS, the
varmint rifle with a brown beavertail
laminated
stock and a 26" barrel in 6mmREM. A guy's wife bought it for him but he didn't think the 6mm was a good cartridge, so he put it up for sale brand new in the box for $600 at a gun show. As any savvy rifle guy knows, the 6mmREM is an excellent cartridge that lives under the shadow of the slightly lower performing .243WIN and now is not chambered in any Remington standard production rifle. It shoots fairly well for me and that load chronographs at 3,710 feet per second.
This a fun and very interesting thread - thanks for starting it!
Ed